According to MyHeritage I could be Paulistana

[Sasaolo68]

Don't understand your post. Since SP received mostly Venetians, and also a big chunck of Meridionales in the capital, why the Tuscan cluster her close to SP, since most Italians in the state weren't from Tuscany?

São Paulo received many immigrants from Central Italy, probably even more than Northern Italians, that must be the reason why she clusters with SP, most Southern Italians settled near to the city of São Paulo meanwhile the rural area received many people from Tuscany and Lazio.

[Sasaolo68]

Double.

[Latinus]

São Paulo received many immigrants from Central Italy, probably even more than Northern Italians, that must be the reason why she clusters with SP, most Southern Italians settled near to the city of São Paulo meanwhile the rural area received many people from Tuscany and Lazio.

I didn't know that. I thought SP's Italic was mainly Northern Italy >>>> Southern Italy (mainly in the capital, a bunch heavily involved in anarchist/socialism movements) and with a small minority of Central Italians.

[Sasaolo68]

I didn't know that. I thought SP's Italic was mainly Northern Italy >>>> Southern Italy (mainly in the capital, a bunch heavily involved in anarchist/socialism movements) and with a small minority of Central Italians.

many people from tuscany(toscana) settled in SP, also from Abruzzo/Molise too, a famous paulista with Molisan origins would be Rivellino.

[Latinus]

many people from tuscany(toscana) settled in SP, also from Abruzzo/Molise too, a famous paulista with Molisan origins would be Rivellino.

What we can conclude from that data is that, compared to Espirito's and Southern region's more homogenously Northern Italian stock, SP's Italics were more diverse when it comes to their regions of origin in Italy itself, there was a Northern (Venetian) predominance, but also many Meridionales (like Campanians) and Central (like Tuscans) ones.

It's funny that when many people discuss the contrast between Italian immigration to the US VS Brazil, they treat both like being very homogenous when it comes to the Italian regions they originate from, just switching the regions from the opposite one.

It is said most Italian-Americans have roots from Southern Italy/Sicily, in contrast with Brazil's pred Northern stock.

And while not a wrong assertion, it gives the impression that Brazil received few Terrones, when it's not true.

It's the USA that received few Italian imput outside Northern Italy, not Brazil having received few Southern Italian immigrants.

SP's Italian ancestry is very Northern and Southern, like Aegentina's, not like Espirito Santo and Southern region with it's more homogenous Northern Italic stock.

[GiCa]

And no Porteña?

I got only São Paulo



IBERIAN 39.6
GREEK AND SOUTH ITALIAN 31.9
WESTERN ASIAN 12.1
NORTHERN AND WESTERN EUROPEAN 11.1
ITALIAN 2.3
ASCHENAZI JEWISH 2.0
MIDDLE EASTERN 1.0

ITALY: EMILIA ROMAGNA high confidency
BRAZIL: SAO PAULO medium confidency (composed of Portuguese and Italian settlers coming in Brazil state of Sao Paulo from Portugal and Northern Italy)
ITALY: FLORENCE, BOLOGNA, RAVENNA low confidency
ITALY: FRIULI VENEZIA GIULIA low confidency

[Sasaolo68]

What we can conclude from that data is that, compared to Espirito's and Southern region's more homogenously Northern Italian stock, SP's Italics were more diverse when it comes to their regions of origin in Italy itself, there was a Northern (Venetian) predominance, but also many Meridionales (like Campanians) and Central (like Tuscans) ones.

It's funny that when many people discuss the contrast between Italian immigration to the US VS Brazil, they treat both like being very homogenous when it comes to the Italian regions they originate from, just switching the regions from the opposite one.

It is said most Italian-Americans have roots from Southern Italy/Sicily, in contrast with Brazil's pred Northern stock.

And while not a wrong assertion, it gives the impression that Brazil received few Terrones, when it's not true.

It's the USA that received few Italian imput outside Northern Italy, not Brazil having received few Southern Italian immigrants.

SP's Italian ancestry is very Northern and Southern, like Aegentina's, not like Espirito Santo and Southern region with it's more homogenous Northern Italic stock.

I think there are many Southern Italians in the rural area of São Paulo too, and Central/Southern Italians too(from Abruzzo), most paulistas i know from the "interior" have Southern Italian origin too.

[Tenma de Pegasus]

Don't understand your post. Since SP received mostly Venetians, and also a big chunck of Meridionales in the capital, why the Tuscan cluster her close to SP, since most Italians in the state weren't from Tuscany?

You are being too specific, I was not, just said italians in general.

[Tenma de Pegasus]

CONCLUSION: GIGA IS PORTUGUESE FROM LISBOA

[Aodhan]

I got only São Paulo



IBERIAN 39.6
GREEK AND SOUTH ITALIAN 31.9
WESTERN ASIAN 12.1
NORTHERN AND WESTERN EUROPEAN 11.1
ITALIAN 2.3
ASCHENAZI JEWISH 2.0
MIDDLE EASTERN 1.0

ITALY: EMILIA ROMAGNA high confidency
BRAZIL: SAO PAULO medium confidency (composed of Portuguese and Italian settlers coming in Brazil state of Sao Paulo from Portugal and Northern Italy)
ITALY: FLORENCE, BOLOGNA, RAVENNA low confidency
ITALY: FRIULI VENEZIA GIULIA low confidency

Bro. My heritage took all my Italian and added on Iberian too. Its just lame.
Also, we could be matchs. Do you have Gedmatch?