How ethnic English look in London

[aherne]

I've just returned from a trip to Central London and wanted to share with you some observations I've had regarding locals' phenotype:

1. City is absolutely "multicultural", as expected: not too many blacks (far less than in France), but plenty of Indians and South Asians. Streets looked safer than I expected...
2. About half of faces I saw looked obviously indigenous (an even Kelto-Germanic blend)
3. Germanic faces are SUPER common among natives, mostly belonging to a blondish Corded derivative altered by Scandinavian admixture (different from Scandinavians today that look heavily boreal CM)
4. Keltic faces are equally common, mostly belonging to a Corded derivative as well that is generally brown haired in adulthood. Catty eyes is one of their distinguishing feature!
5. Blonde hair is very common among children and adults (men and women), but not a majority (similar to Dutch)
6. Indigenous women look good (better than here in RO), but they are incredibly vulgar and "woke" (which makes them unattractive and worthless)

North German and Dutch tourists were impossible to distinguish from locals BTW...

[Mortimer]

Did you talked to the locals? How do you know they are vulgar and woke?

[arkas]

Interesting.

Here I found an ethnic map of London, with each dot representing 10 people of that ancestry. I think London is a lot more diverse than the rest of the UK though.

[Norb]

so London is the Germanic homeland of Europe? Cordeds everywhere!

[aherne]

Did you talked to the locals? How do you know they are vulgar and woke?

Many indigenous young women I saw had "1km cock stare", many were tattooed, many lined up in skimpy clothes before being accepted to bars while drunk already, many had angry/annoying attitude, many man/women were dating outside their race. Degeneracy in a nutshell there...

[Oliver109]

I've just returned from a trip to Central London and wanted to share with you some observations I've had regarding locals' phenotype:

1. City is absolutely "multicultural", as expected: not too many blacks (far less than in France), but plenty of Indians and South Asians. Streets looked safer than I expected...
2. About half of faces I saw looked obviously indigenous (an even Kelto-Germanic blend)
3. Germanic faces are SUPER common among natives, mostly belonging to a blondish Corded derivative altered by Scandinavian admixture (different from Scandinavians today that look heavily boreal CM)
4. Keltic faces are equally common, mostly belonging to a Corded derivative as well that is generally brown haired in adulthood. Catty eyes is one of their distinguishing feature!
5. Blonde hair is very common among children and adults (men and women), but not a majority (similar to Dutch)
6. Indigenous women look good (better than here in RO), but they are incredibly vulgar and "woke" (which makes them unattractive and worthless)

North German and Dutch tourists were impossible to distinguish from locals BTW...

Good to see a report from my home city, i think the number of Blacks has actually declined in central London at least where they generally never live(usually live in places well outside the centre like Croydon, Stratford and Tottenham. What you say about the Corded elements is very true, especially in the upper class areas which you probably visited though they are not usually pure and more watered down with CM or Keltic. Can you give an example of an English person with the catty eyed look? lol Was your impression of the English that they are taller than the French or even Germans? Shame about the attitude of the women but there you go i suppose, the rural areas are probably more down to earth though often less attractive as well especially further north and west England.

[Gebachs]

Once I was told by an Englishman that the majority of the white working class in big cities of England are actually of Irish origin. How true is that? He was mad about people visiting his country and getting the wrong impression about the English because of this. He also said that in rural England, Wayne Rooney types are quite rare.

[Oliver109]

Once I was told by an Englishman that the majority of the white working class in big cities of England are actually of Irish origin. How true is that? He was mad about people visiting his country and getting the wrong impression about the English because of this. He also said that in rural England, Wayne Rooney types are quite rare.

It might be higher in Manchester or Liverpool but in London the names are British about 70% of the time when it comes to the native born white group with the rest being Irish, Italian or Cypriot(who would usually look different anyway)

[Tooting Carmen]

Once I was told by an Englishman that the majority of the white working class in big cities of England are actually of Irish origin. How true is that? He was mad about people visiting his country and getting the wrong impression about the English because of this. He also said that in rural England, Wayne Rooney types are quite rare.

It would be an exaggeration to say that an absolute majority of England's white working-class is of Irish origin, but a lot are for sure. In Wales too, whenever I post criminals and most-wanted suspects from WalesOnline, I am always taken aback by the number of Irish surnames.

[Oliver109]

It would be an exaggeration to say that an absolute majority of England's white working-class is of Irish origin, but a lot are for sure. In Wales too, whenever I post criminals and most-wanted suspects from WalesOnline, I am always taken aback by the number of Irish surnames.

Also there is the fact that a lot of the English people the OP would have seen in London would either be people who have moved into the city from the shires like the hipster types or commuters from the home counties and native tourists. i suppose if you did your study of London phenotypes in say NW London or Islington then a good 1/3 would have a lot of Irish ancestry.