Why Whites make fun of reperations?

[Tooting Carmen]

Bullshit. The reason of jewish discrimination was their different religion, it was not racial. Only Hitler thought that jews are a race.
Gypsies were discriminated because of their nomad lifestyle, of course the feudal lords did not tolerate it. Habsburgs have tried to assimilate gypsies many times, but gypsies were these who wanted to keep their nomadism.

I can give you tons of example that medieval europeans did not care about race. Cuman migrants were mongoloid looking, and nobody discriminated them, or Jász migrants were brown skinned and there is no any source about their racial discrimination. There was no any racial based discrimination towards arabs or turks either, only religious,

It isn't as simple as that. During the Inquisition, while the emphasis was certainly on the religious aspect, there was a racial aspect too, in that those with dark skin and without blue blood were often suspected of being conversos or moriscos and accordingly discriminated against.

[Blondie]

It isn't as simple as that. During the Inquisition, while the emphasis was certainly on the religious aspect, there was a racial aspect too, in that those with dark skin and without blue blood were often suspected of being conversos or moriscos and accordingly discriminated against.

In the medieval age the religion was the most important identity factor. Religion and feudal rivalism were the only reason of medival wars. There were no racial or ethnic wars at this time.

[Incal]

Are you becoming far left mort?

He supports anything that will allow him to leech forever and never work. If tomorrow the neonazis supported some bill to grant even more handouts and welfare to the vermin and parasites he'd somehow find an excuse to vouch neonazis and say they are good now.

[Petalpusher]

Yes, but the point is the latter is far more recent than the former and thus has had a far more immediate and profound effect on people's lives even today. Jim Crow didn't 'merely' force Blacks to live separate from Whites, but forbade, or at least severely restricted, their access to a range of jobs, facilities and property.

For jobs it was a lot less severe than with South African apartheid. It still doesn't make any sense how that prevents blacks today to get an education and work any job they want, furthermore what that would change if you give say every Afram 100k$ (for a mere 1 Trilion dollars budget). A very small percentage might have inherited from their family who would have possibly became richer in the late 1900's and even that is a stretch based on coulda shoulda. Generally the same people who propose reparations are also strongly against social reproduction through wealth inheritance (which i don't entirely disagree with)

[Tooting Carmen]

For jobs it was a lot less severe than with South African apartheid. It still doesn't make any sense how that prevents blacks today to get an education and work any job they want, furthermore what that would change if you give say every Afram 100k$ (for a mere 1 Trilion dollars budget). A very small percentage might have inherited from their family who would have possibly became richer in the late 1900's and even that is a stretch based on coulda shoulda. Generally the same people who propose reparations are also strongly against social reproduction through wealth inheritance (which i don't entirely disagree with)

Ever heard of 'accumulated capital'? While not set in stone, the more prosperous your parents (and ancestors even further back), the more chance you will be successful yourself.

[Petalpusher]

Ever heard of 'accumulated capital'? While not set in stone, the more prosperous your parents (and ancestors even further back), the more chance you will be successful yourself.

Sounds like a social sleight of hand for the underlying high heritability of IQ. The threshold in a country like America or the West in general today would be very low for someone to not be able to go through education and be so hindered by his parents that he wouldn't have any way to become more successful himself. Reverse cases also exist and are even often prominent with people who come from "nothing" in 1st world terms, and get extremely wealthy/successful. On average and for most of the population it's certainly better explained by inheriting parent's traits. In the same way we used to link poverty with crime but the datas never mesh as clearly as expected (see study above)

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

It isn't as simple as that. During the Inquisition, while the emphasis was certainly on the religious aspect, there was a racial aspect too, in that those with dark skin and without blue blood were often suspected of being conversos or moriscos and accordingly discriminated against.

Tooting Carmen once again speaking nonsense.

I never read such a thing except that redheads were consider to be crypto-Jews because it was believed Judas Iscariot was a red head (yes, I know that it's a retardd reason to think someone is Jewish) but Sephardic Jews and Moriscos didn't look any different from their Christian neighbors. The reason someone would be targeted for being a converso or Morisco is because their family background was well known to local authorities. This is why so many from both groups left for the colonies

[Tooting Carmen]

Sounds like a social sleight of hand for the underlying high heritability of IQ. The threshold in a country like America or the West in general today would be very low for someone to not be able to go through education and be so hindered by his parents that he wouldn't have any way to become more successful himself. Reverse cases also exist and are even often prominent with people who come from "nothing" in 1st world terms, and get extremely wealthy/successful. On average and for most of the population it's certainly better explained by inheriting parent's traits.

That's funny - the evidence is that social mobility throughout the West has stagnated if not declined since at least the 1970's. Most people, in the West and Third World alike, stay in the same social class as their parents (whether it is largely through choice or circumstance is essentially a moot point). The immediate post-war period, which did see many people from working-class backgrounds move upwards, was the exception.

[Tooting Carmen]

Tooting Carmen once again speaking nonsense.

I never read such a thing except that redheads were consider to be crypto-Jews because it was believed Judas Iscariot was a red head (yes, I know that it's a retardd reason to think someone is Jewish) but Sephardic Jews and Moriscos didn't look any different from their Christian neighbors. The reason someone would be targeted for being a converso or Morisco is because their family background was well known to local authorities. This is why so many from both groups left for the colonies

Then what was the 'blue-blooded' concept all about? It was about people having light enough skin so their blue veins could be easily seen.

[Cristiano viejo]

Why whites make fun of reparations?? because current whites dont have why to pay for something they have not done