Which national group has the worst record on miscegenation?

[Sebastianus Rex]

[QUOTE=Xenomorph;814229]

The history of the human race is mixing. All of the cultures that we see today would not have happened if people hadn't moved around and intermixed. What we should be striving to preserve above all else are the values of western civilization while adapting to future trend. There are no golden ages, and trying to go back in time will just lead to decline.

Once again, wrong forum. Join a communist pro-miscegination forum, i'm sure there are many.

Oh, can you give me the name of ONE sucessful civilization that was the product of race mixing ?

Please don't use your cultural marxist demagogy, don't try to compare mixing between european/caucasian peoples like there was in the USA since colonial times and to some extend in Europe with the mixing with races that only lower dangerously the level of white countries.

[2Cool]

[QUOTE=Sebastianus Rex;815762]

Once again, wrong forum. Join a communist pro-miscegination forum, i'm sure there are many.

Oh, can you give me the name of ONE sucessful civilization that was the product of race mixing ?

Please don't use your cultural marxist demagogy, don't try to compare mixing between european/caucasian peoples like there was in the USA since colonial times and to some extend in Europe with the mixing with races that only lower dangerously the level of white countries.

Would Ancient Egypt count?

The Islamic Civilization was also quite successful. There was a lot of mixing if I recall correctly. But the sacking of Baghdad by the Mongolians plus the rise of Wahhabism destroyed them.

[Benacer]

It wouldn't be fair to blame Portugal for race mixing to maintain its colonial Empire. Portugal is a small country, and the population has never been too high. How do you maintain a continental empire abroad if you don't have a great amount of colonists to send? The answer seemed quite simple. Mixed race people aided Portugal, Spain and France by creating a connection and a new intermediate between the natives and the European colonial powers.

[2Cool]

It wouldn't be fair to blame Portugal for race mixing to maintain its colonial Empire. Portugal is a small country, and the population has never been too high. How do you maintain a continental empire abroad if you don't have a great amount of colonists to send? The answer seemed quite simple. Mixed race people aided Portugal, Spain and France by creating a connection and a new intermediate between the natives and the European colonial powers.

No just that. But race mixing helped appease the natives. You are less likely to hate the people who took over your land if they are also your family members.

[Sebastianus Rex]

[QUOTE]

You obviously have a comprehension problem. You shouldn't respond to posts you don't understand. And don't give me "advice", you fucker.

Glad to know we have such eloquent users, usually white people don't lose their nerve so easily...must be the result of some colonial race mixing.

Anyways, back to reality, if you can't deal with the facts of this topic you shouldn't argue with people about it. spain, Portugal, obvious answer to OP question.

To me it is irrelevant, the mixing did not ocurred in Europe but in the colonies, i was just pointing there are two ways of looking at this question:
1. The historical perspective, colonization process.
2. Present time, what is happening right now.

Wich one you find more relevant ?

You deal with the facts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMqCz...layer_embedded

I can answer that question now. The answer is that my daughter, and approximately 400,000 other children like her in Britain today, is mixed race. Families like mine are on the rise – nearly one in 10 British children now lives in a mixed-race family, a figure that is six times higher than it was when I was a child. In fact, mixed race people are the fastest-growing minority in this country, a trend that is set to continue. Even in my community, traditionally inward-looking when it comes to choosing partners, the proportion of mixed marriages has increased from 3 per cent to 11 per cent in the space of just 14 years.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/...n6547886.shtml

Study: 1 in 7 New U.S. Marriages is Interracial

.The rate of interracial marriage in the United States has doubled since 1980, hitting a record 14.6 percent of all new marriages in 2008, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of new data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Those two demographic groups were more likely to marry outside of their race or ethnicity, according to the Pew analysis. Thirty-one percent of Asians and 26 percent of Hispanics had interracial marriages in 2008. By comparison, the figure was 9 percent for whites and 16 percent for blacks.
Gender patterns in interracial married fluctuated depending on race. Two out of five Asian women married outside their race in 2008, compared with just one in five Asian men. By contrast, black men (22 percent) were more than twice as likely to marry outside their race as black women (9 percent) among 2008 newlyweds.

Pew researchers pointed to President Barack Obama's black father and white mother to illustrate the overall increase in interracial marriage in the United States.

When Mr. Obama's parents were married in 1961, less than one in 1,000 new marriages was between a black person and a white person. By 1980, the figure was one in 150 new marriages. By 2008, the year Mr. Obama was elected to the White House, it had risen to one in 60.

Due to increasing interracial marriages, multiracial Americans are a small but fast-growing demographic group, making up about 5 percent of the minority population. Together with blacks, Hispanics and Asians, the Census Bureau estimates they collectively will represent a majority of the U.S. population by mid-century.

[OldNo.7]

[QUOTE=Sebastianus Rex;815839]

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/...n6547886.shtml

Wow, that is really bad.