1
Well the English don't take any ownership over Charlemagne, if anything as a Frankish King he's seen as French, wrong as it may seem. But the Latish folk that call themselves Franks are another rabbit-hole altogether.
Ceorl as a King is rather unlikely, as it meant a lowly land-worker, hence its begotten word churlish. But having a King with a French name is indeed a shame, how about re-taking a good old English name that's been born-again as the benchmark of manliness: King Chad!
Bookmarks