0
Since Coon did not have a faelid type, there seems to be a lot of overlap between Coon's borreby and some of the other anthropologist's category of Faelid at the time.
Out of curiousity, do you believe this man from Germany that Coon labelled as borreby would still be classified as borreby on this thread, or do you believe he would be more classified as faelid(or something else?). Also where would you place him? Does he look typical German? Would he pass more in the north or south of Germany?
Bookmarks