7 Double Standards Men Face (And Women Don’t)

[Your Old Comrade]

Welcome back to the channel, where we dive deep into topics that challenge our perspectives and encourage understanding between genders. In today's thought-provoking video, Sarah explores the often-overlooked double standards that men face in our society but oftentimes women don't. This discussion was inspired by a previous short that ignited conversations worldwide, amassing over 5 million views and thousands of comments. Our mission here on the channel is simple: to bridge the gap, promote empathy, and shed light on the complex issues that affect us all.

Chapters:

Introduction (0:00)
Sarah kicks off this engaging conversation by introducing the topic and providing some context for what's to come.

Double Standard #1: Violence (1:23)
Sarah tackles the troubling double standard that suggests men must have provoked violence when faced with physical aggression, while women who commit similar acts often receive more leniency.

Double Standard #2: Stay-at-Home Dads (5:12)
Let's dive into the stereotypes surrounding men who choose to be stay-at-home dads and the societal expectations that often undermine their roles as nurturing fathers.

Double Standard #3: Divorce Courts (9:17)
Sarah discusses the disparities men often encounter within divorce court proceedings and the challenges they face when it comes to alimony and child custody.

Double Standard #4: Intimacy and Rejection (13:58)
Explore the societal pressures placed on men regarding intimacy and the judgment they endure when they need to decline advances.

Double Standard #5: The Check (18:27)
We delve into the subtle but impactful practice where waitstaff often hand the check to men, assuming they will pay, highlighting the need for mutual respect and balanced expectations.

Double Standard #6: Traditional Gender Roles (22:41)
Discover the persisting expectations that men should be the primary maintainers of households, even when their partners are more than capable.

Double Standard #7: Compliments (27:05)
Sarah delves into how compliments differ in meaning and perception based on the gender of the giver and receiver, shedding light on another subtle double standard.

Conclusion (32:15)
Sarah wraps up this enlightening conversation, by emphasizing the importance of recognizing and addressing these double standards in our society.

Join Sarah and the community in this essential dialogue about gender expectations and the disparities that affect men today. Your thoughts and experiences are invaluable, so don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to Sarah's channel for more insightful content. Engage in the conversation in the comments section below, share your perspectives, and let's work together to promote empathy, equality, and a deeper understanding between the sexes.

This expanded description provides a comprehensive overview of the video's content, making it more informative and engaging for viewers. It also encourages comments and engagement by inviting the audience to share their thoughts and experiences on the topic.

[HectorOfTroy]

Double Standard #1: Violence (1:23)
Sarah tackles the troubling double standard that suggests men must have provoked violence when faced with physical aggression, while women who commit similar acts often receive more leniency.

I find it really cringe whenever someone brings up the "its female nature" to justify some dogshit behaviour (lying/deceit, manipulation, literal cucking) from women. Well in that case, then it can be said it's male nature to go out stab living creatures to death and kill other men or inflicting physical violence on other humans when need be (hunting, tribal warfare), men have been regularly doing that for tens of thousands of years, thus it's male nature to have a much stronger physically aggressive drive than women. but obviously one would never use that line of reasoning when talking about wife beaters and men who beat up other people in moments of rage (dogshit male behaviours). So I guess it's excusable when a woman is a PoS, just not a man, according to them.

Basically, anyone who would use "evolutionary psychology/evolution of the sexes" to pass off/ignore psychopathic behaviours is an imbecile, because of the logic above. I see some goofs doing that for women and it's cringe af.

[Your Old Comrade]

I find it really cringe whenever someone brings up the "its female nature" to justify some dogshit behaviour (lying/deceit, manipulation, literal cucking) from women. Well in that case, then it can be said it's male nature to go out stab living creatures to death and kill other men or inflicting physical violence on other humans when need be (hunting, tribal warfare), men have been regularly doing that for tens of thousands of years, thus it's male nature to have a much stronger physically aggressive drive than women. but obviously one would never use that line of reasoning when talking about wife beaters and men who beat up other people in moments of rage (dogshit male behaviours). So I guess it's excusable when a woman is a PoS, just not a man, according to them.

Basically, anyone who would use "evolutionary psychology/evolution of the sexes" to pass off/ignore psychopathic behaviours is an imbecile, because of the logic above. I see some goofs doing that for women and it's cringe af.

Remember Eve in the Book of Genesis ? It is female nature.

[HectorOfTroy]

Remember Eve in the Book of Genesis ? It is female nature.

So it is male nature to be physically violent by that logic too then.

[oszkar07]

I find it really cringe whenever someone brings up the "its female nature" to justify some dogshit behaviour (lying/deceit, manipulation, literal cucking) from women. Well in that case, then it can be said it's male nature to go out stab living creatures to death and kill other men or inflicting physical violence on other humans when need be (hunting, tribal warfare), men have been regularly doing that for tens of thousands of years, thus it's male nature to have a much stronger physically aggressive drive than women. but obviously one would never use that line of reasoning when talking about wife beaters and men who beat up other people in moments of rage (dogshit male behaviours). So I guess it's excusable when a woman is a PoS, just not a man, according to them.

Basically, anyone who would use "evolutionary psychology/evolution of the sexes" to pass off/ignore psychopathic behaviours is an imbecile, because of the logic above. I see some goofs doing that for women and it's cringe af.

Women, (some more than others) also have aggressive drives but it is expressed differently through
... passive aggressive behaviours or calculating and manipulative behaviours or just straight out bitchyness or obnoxiousness or entitled behaviours. They in this can be prone to use and abuse who they think they can, mamalian -behaviours =(predatory)

Women get into bullying behaviours as much as men can do, they are also wired to some degree to be maternal and nurturing and some are that more than others.

Ive met several females that expressed preference for hanging out with guys over other females because they said females are more bitchy and obnoxious.

Addit: just take a look at womens MMA or bareknuckle boxing for anyone who thinks females cant have aggressive drives.

[HectorOfTroy]

Women, (some more than others) also have aggressive drives but it is expressed differently through
... passive aggressive behaviours or calculating and manipulative behaviours or just straight out bitchyness or obnoxiousness or entitled behaviours. They in this can be prone to use and abuse who they think they can, mamalian -behaviours =(predatory)

Women get into bullying behaviours as much as men can do, they are also wired to some degree to be maternal and nurturing and some are that more than others.

Ive met several females that expressed preference for hanging out with guys over other females because they said females are more bitchy and obnoxious.

Addit: just take a look at womens MMA or bareknuckle boxing for anyone who thinks females cant have aggressive drives.

It's obviously way less than a mans, and far less women are into UFC than men. Didn't say they don't have one, just that men have far stronger ones (women didn't spend several thousand years killing huge animals CQC melee weapon style, as well as inflicting physical violence on other humans during tribal warfare), and that these kinds of things aren't excuses for shit unwarranted behaviours just like we don't justify gangbangers.

[Your Old Comrade]

Every day should be a day that we appreciate and thank men for everything they do and have done for us. But here are some stats & some editorial that proves we do NOT give men the credit they deserve.