0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,780 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,780 |
That's partly it. But also Arabs are considered to be (relatively) White and Caucasoid in Latin America themselves - at least compared to Amerindians, Blacks and those heavily admixed with them. Whereas Arabs in Europe are mostly darker than even the swarthiest Southern Europeans.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,780 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,131 Given: 7 |
Japan South Korea. China Taiwan are considered East Asia
China is considered developed very techy. If you know what I mean lmao
South East Asia is different. Geographically singapore is in South East Asia but most Singaporean and especially most rich Singaporean are Chinese
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,269 Given: 4,558 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,780 |
Lazily and perhaps incorrectly, I consider SE Asia as well as NE Asia when I say "East Asia". And most of those countries are as poor as Latin American countries, perhaps more so. As for China, however glitzy its main cities might appear, GDP per capita is still nothing like Western or Japanese levels.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,131 Given: 7 |
Asian say that Chinese is same as Japanese. Asian feel same. Russian and German both look white so
And even those East European are richer than African immigrants.
European immigrant might have been poor. But rich dude in latin America were white
Because East Asian as a community is considered rich
Check sat and compare . East Asian and black score. East Asian do better than whites lol and black do worst
Imagine if black had best grades but East Asian had worst. Then what would have been?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,780 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks