0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 181 Given: 181 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 535 Given: 334 |
Anyone can say anything. Without a source it's worth nothing.
Imagine how much bigger would gypsy fertility rate have to be so that 3% of the population (gypsies) have 18% of the births.
That would mean that gypsies have a fertility rate 6 times larger than the overall population, meaning 6 x 1.5 = 9 live births per gypsy woman on average!! This is complete idiocy. We know already from the Romanian census figures that gypsy fertility rate is 1.7 births per woman, meaning a rate below replacement, which is also reflected in the overall census figures: the number of Romanian gypsies has decreased between 2011 and 2022 from ~600k to ~500k.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,515 Given: 4,601 |
Seems believable to me, the gypsy fertility rate is already more than 10% larger than the Romanian fertility rate,
and gypsy fertility and population may be under-reported as well.
Likewise the Romanian population has declined as well, yet the PROPORTION of gypsies will be increase.
Similar situation in Bulgaria, also with Turks and Muslims
Also I heard that the EU elite wants to turn Eastern Europe into a refugee camp, force Eastern Europe to accept mass migration.
This will be happening eventually in severely depopulated Ukraine no doubt.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,973 Given: 3,721 |
Migration and expulsion of Turks from Bulgaria to Turkey
Years Total
1877–78 130,000 (of whom half returned) or 500,000
until 1887 145,284
1887–1892 64,613
1892–1900 50,267
1900–1905 44,718
1905–1910 52,684
1878–1912 350,00
1912–1925 100,00
1923–1949 220,08
1950–1959 154,47
1960–1969 2,582
1970–1979 113,56
1980–1989 225,892 (369,839, to 1990, 154,937 returned)
1989–2001 16,000 or 74,564
2000–2007 138
Most Turks left Bulgaria and the Muslims there are native.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks