2
I didn't change the topic. You just don't understand what I'm saying.
To ask a population to completely switch languages is a major change in the life of a people. The transition would be chaotic and would cause an uproar.I first claimed that it would be possible to switch to English in Ireland if that is really wanted and I emphasised that that was my only point.
In other words, not possible because you're directly fucking with people's lives, and people will react negatively.
It's simply child-like to talk about a major shift in a nation without considering the consequences. I used Israel as the opposite because they have no other option since you're dealing with very different groups speaking their own language and these groups understand that reality and the need to conform.
I understand your argument about using force to get people to do what you want but you fail to understand when you fuck with people's lives directly they will fuck with you right back. You won't win enough people over for your plan to make it mandatory for administrative purposes to speak Gaelic. Yes, what the people think matters, and people don't like their lives directly affected by what they see as unnecessary.After you also questioned whether that would be legit to do considering that a lot of people don't care, I told my general take that as long as other people are forced to do something in favour of Patrick Murphy, Patrick Murphy can also well have to stand that things are done in favour for other compatriots. To which degree this is the case in Ireland I don't know. I just said that this could be legit "molestation".
I'm sure pissing them off by making a language that most don't speak fluently or understand obligatory if you want to deal with the state would work out fine. I'm sure interpreters will make a great deal of money.Now you bring up the next question whether the full re-introduction of Irish would be a reasonable aim. It's an understandable next question but I just want to point out that we now are far beyond what I initially commented on. This is no topic of mine and I think that the Irish society will have to decide what to do and likely they have done so in that sense as what is the current state. But they can change their mind, of course.
That's nice.If I'd be an Irish I'd likely be positive to an effective preservation in the same way as the (re-)introduction of Nynorsk in Norway is a sympatethic idea to me. To me the different grown cultures are part of the richdom of the world and I find them often worth being effectively preserved. Not always and things are not black and white. F. i. I'd not support in Germany to ban High German in former Low German speaking areas in order to effectively preserve Low German. I consider the hurtful cultural loss of Low German a reasonable sacrifice for the unity of Germany.
What you are is a German who doesn't understand people.I'm a German and I don't feel entitled to prescibe other people (ethnicities) what to do in such complicated questions. I just say as a foreigner and European that it after all would be nice to have at least one state left in the world that would care for and maintain a Celtic language as a fully functional and living language.
Bookmarks