2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,033 Given: 12,262 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,452 Given: 31,624 |
wow, ratio was 17 to 1 back then, but it's 4 to 1 now, still unexpected I'd say
Thumbs Up |
Received: 18,508 Given: 13,210 |
We were basically animals, so it makes sense.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 65 Given: 291 |
I'd imagine size and appearance played a significant role. Maybe a greater disparity in heights too due to variable nutrition?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,500 Given: 5,742 |
That's pretty much the stats of dating apps, 5-10% deemed attractive. So we ll probably beat those figures in the forseeable future. In a way that made us better, as men, even if a lot had to pay the price.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,269 Given: 13,634 |
Golddigging even back then.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,282 Given: 4,568 |
Those people who think old times were good times, they would be VERY surprised had they traveled to those times.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 848 Given: 286 |
I'd wager there was a lot of rape and bride selling going on back then. Huge thing in early Indo-European culture.
Just saying.
Women might (sometimes rightfully, sometimes not) be picky, but people weren't exactly living in modern societies with a lot of free choice back then lol.
It's Modelo Negra time
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,197 Given: 3,029 |
Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck is probably caused by wars between clans (members of clans had similar Y chromosomes)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 246 Given: 144 |
It probably has to do with wars or geneocide,since in the rest of history in general the difference,although it existed,was minimal or was no more than 1-2 1-3
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks