Global Regions Calc K25 v1

[ScandinavianCelt]

Target: Brad(NE-America)_AncestryDNA_Scaled_Official
Distance: 2.0484% / 0.02048435
81.4 North_Europe
12.2 South_Europe
2.8 North_India
2.0 CHG
1.0 America_Central
0.6 Middle_East



This calc prob needs some tweaking, but try it if you want.

[drb234]

Target: drb_scaled
Distance: 2.6602% / 0.02660175
72.8 North_Europe
25.2 South_Europe
2.0 WHG

[Kiel]

Target: Kiel_scaled
Distance: 1.5877% / 0.01587685
64.4 North_Europe
21.8 South_Europe
7.0 Middle_East
5.2 Central_Europe
1.0 WHG
0.6 CHG

[nittionia]

Target: nittionia_scaled
Distance: 2.7090% / 0.02708965
71.2 North_Europe
23.0 South_Europe
2.8 WHG
2.6 Siberia
0.2 CHG
0.2 North_India

[sacha]

These two refs don't really make sense:

Distance to: Middle_East
0.02666982 Samaritan
0.03873054 Karaite_Iraq
0.03974876 Lebanese_Christian
0.04640117 Karaite_Egypt
0.04735529 Lebanese_Druze

Distance to: SW_Asia
0.00000000 Turkish_Deliorman
0.02739552 Turkish_Rumeli
0.03590545 Gagauz
0.04084559 Bulgarian
0.04323461 Greek_East_Macedonia_and_Thrace

Why does Turkish have its own unaveraged reference (I would understand some kind of Turkic but that would be a rework of some other categories) and why is the Middle East ref just Levantine/Jewish? It's a bit odd because when you put something that should be close to whatever ref it is a part of (like, it's the first thing you think of), you get this:

Distance to: Saudi
0.09397560 Middle_East
0.15401421 Mediterranean_Islands
0.15863673 North_Africa
0.19919168 South_Europe
0.20126707 SW_Asia
0.25412198 Central_Europe
0.27235047 North_Europe
0.27403845 East_Europe
0.30251266 CHG
0.30320500 Central_Asia

Or even like Iranian, comes out like this:

Distance to: Iranian
0.12827549 Middle_East
0.13211295 Mediterranean_Islands
0.13238258 SW_Asia
0.16886615 CHG
0.17186937 South_Europe
0.19607362 Central_Europe
0.20907578 Central_Asia
0.20990424 North_Africa
0.21111176 North_Europe
0.21249391 East_Europe

It's a really weird system.

[sacha]

Also, if you're using all modern references and some of the reference have CHG, WHG as their components, I don't think it is necessarily to put in time-period-inappropriate references for them by themselves. That doesn't really tell the same information as the rest of the calculator.

[Kess]

Target: Kess_scaled
Distance: 2.8062% / 0.02806212
30.2 SW_Asia
24.6 CHG
21.0 Middle_East
12.6 South_Europe
9.2 Central_Asia
1.2 East_Asian
0.8 America_South
0.4 Siberia

[Dušan]

Target: Dušan_scaled
Distance: 2.5735% / 0.02573487
60.8 East_Europe
33.6 South_Europe
4.2 Middle_East
1.4 CHG

[Kess]

Distance to: SW_Asia
0.00000000 Turkish_Deliorman
0.02739552 Turkish_Rumeli
0.03590545 Gagauz
0.04084559 Bulgarian
0.04323461 Greek_East_Macedonia_and_Thrace.

I agree; they are wrongly labeled.

[ScandinavianCelt]

These two refs don't really make sense:

Why does Turkish have its own unaveraged reference (I would understand some kind of Turkic but that would be a rework of some other categories) and why is the Middle East ref just Levantine/Jewish? It's a bit odd because when you put something that should be close to whatever ref it is a part of (like, it's the first thing you think of), you get this:


It's a really weird system.

I agree; they are wrongly labeled.

Both Middle_East and SW_Asia are updated. Both have been averaged to some better degree.

Both were labeled in my files as such and I thought they plotted out appropriately on the PCA.

As I mentioned, it might need a little tweaking, so I'm tweaking for ya.