Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Nearly 30 percent of generation z female identify as LGBTQ

  1. #1
    Veteran Member rajputprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:22 AM
    Ethnicity
    South Asian Rajput
    Country
    American-Samoa
    Gender
    Posts
    8,248
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,134
    Given: 7

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Nearly 30 percent of generation z female identify as LGBTQ

    The Gallup survey, released Wednesday, found that 28.5 percent of women and 10.6 percent of men born between 1997 and 2012 identify as LGBTQ.

    I wonder why there are more LGBTQ women than men

    Tbh I know many women. Who have stopped dating men and only date women now. Because of bad experience with men's.
    They're happy now. Women are definitely better partner according to them.

  2. #2
    Veteran Member rajputprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:22 AM
    Ethnicity
    South Asian Rajput
    Country
    American-Samoa
    Gender
    Posts
    8,248
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,134
    Given: 7

    0 Not allowed!

  3. #3
    Veteran Member rajputprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:22 AM
    Ethnicity
    South Asian Rajput
    Country
    American-Samoa
    Gender
    Posts
    8,248
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,134
    Given: 7

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Of all of the generations included in the survey, Gen Z respondents were most likely to identify as members of the LGBTQ community. Collectively, 22.3 percent of Gen Z survey takers were likely to identify as LGBTQ — compared to 9.8 percent of millennials (born between 1981-96), 4.5 percent of Gen X (born between 1965-80), 2.3 percent of baby boomers (born between 1946-64) and 1.1 percent of the silent generation (born between 1928-45

  4. #4
    Veteran Member rajputprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:22 AM
    Ethnicity
    South Asian Rajput
    Country
    American-Samoa
    Gender
    Posts
    8,248
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,134
    Given: 7

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Probably why incels are becoming more common. So many women only date other womens

  5. #5
    Junior Member Saitama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Last Online
    05-03-2024 @ 03:32 AM
    Ethnicity
    35% South Italian / 29% Finnish / 18% Norwegian / 8% Lithuanian/ 6% North Italy / 4% Sweden
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 30

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    EDIT: Glitchy ass site double posting

  6. #6
    Junior Member Saitama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Last Online
    05-03-2024 @ 03:32 AM
    Ethnicity
    35% South Italian / 29% Finnish / 18% Norwegian / 8% Lithuanian/ 6% North Italy / 4% Sweden
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 30

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Do people actually not generally think that it's through relentless psychological media programming, especially over the last decade, to make men effeminate and mentally weak and make the women hyper-masculine and also to encourage both men and women to believe that they are actually suffering from gender dysmorphia? Having a third of your population's women not even be psychologically/biologically capable of desiring sex with men to procreate, or not desire a family, etc... It's gonna cripple population growth and that population in the coming decades will totally fall. Especially if that 30% remains stable or even increases. Take 100 people. 50 men, 50 women. If each pair only had one child, that's still only 50 new people.

    If they each had 2, then they basically start back at 100 IF the 100 people somehow managed to have a perfectly even number of boys and girls. Obviously this is more random, and some pairs would have more children than others perhaps. But now let's take out 30% of the 50 women. 15 people. Doesn't sound like a lot, but... It is. There are also more women in the world than men, so the number is actually probably gonna seem larger than I make it sound here, right? Those 15 women will never have a kid, take 'em out of the equation entirely. So... What was 100 is now 75. Unless there are suddenly gonna be weird open relationship type scenarios where both men can have a child or multiple children with the same woman... Increase the numbers drastically.

    By default, 15 men will also potentially go without a partner as well. So now it's actually 15% of the male population that will not procreate either.
    Now those 25 men and women would have to all have 4 children just to keep the population total as it currently is. You think people are aggressively trying to have large families? Most probably can't even afford it in the countries where this is even a trend/potential population issue, and most are not willing to live like our ancestors before us, having larger families in poverty conditions and having to bust their asses like crazy potentially.... Modern people are pampered and lack any drive for stuff that was instinctive and natural to previous generations going back a few decades at least...

    Total population control tactic in my mind, long-term, that maybe people think is harmless but is quite insidious... In theory, anyone with a sense of morality would think "well.... we can't force them to change their biology" which is logical and reasonable. But to me, it's been a very long-term campaign of easing into aggressively shoving this sort of stuff down the collective throats of the masses to the point that an agenda has been obvious for so damn long that only the people who are so programmed/blinded by the appeal to morality/emotion/etc.. I think that people don't even think about the logistics of it even in such a basic way..

    In 2022, Gen Z's population was about 70 million. So... Figure out how many were female, and then take nearly 30% of them out of the reproductive equation. Along with nearly 30% of men who may even be "worthy" of a partner but simply cannot find one as there are not enough to go around for monogamous heterosexual pairings. That alone can lead to a huge population collapse from 70 million in future generations. Add in all of the other factors out there adding to the difficulty/improbability of two compatible straight people from having a child. But it's closer to 40% of the population if you add in the 10% of men. So 40% willingly take themselves out, and then another 40% are left with nowhere to sit when the music stops for that round of sexual pairing musical chairs.

  7. #7
    Veteran Member rajputprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:22 AM
    Ethnicity
    South Asian Rajput
    Country
    American-Samoa
    Gender
    Posts
    8,248
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,134
    Given: 7

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saitama View Post
    Do people actually not generally think that it's through relentless psychological media programming, especially over the last decade, to make men effeminate and mentally weak and make the women hyper-masculine and also to encourage both men and women to believe that they are actually suffering from gender dysmorphia? Having a third of your population's women not even be psychologically/biologically capable of desiring sex with men to procreate, or not desire a family, etc... It's gonna cripple population growth and that population in the coming decades will totally fall. Especially if that 30% remains stable or even increases. Take 100 people. 50 men, 50 women. If each pair only had one child, that's still only 50 new people.

    If they each had 2, then they basically start back at 100 IF the 100 people somehow managed to have a perfectly even number of boys and girls. Obviously this is more random, and some pairs would have more children than others perhaps. But now let's take out 30% of the 50 women. 15 people. Doesn't sound like a lot, but... It is. Especially when you need women. There are also more women in the world than men, so the number is actually probably gonna seem larger than I make it sound here, right? Those 15 women will never have a kid, take 'em out of the equation entirely. So... What was 100 is now 75. Unless there are suddenly gonna be weird open relationship type scenarios where both men can have a child or multiple children with the same woman... Increase the numbers drastically.

    By default, 15 men will also potentially go without a partner as well. So now it's actually 15% of the male population that will not procreate either. Perhaps the percentage of men who identify as LGBTQ is even HIGHER than the women. It'd be even more of a difference. Really, whichever percentage would be higher (be it male or female) would automatically raise the percentage in the opposite sex who would logically struggle to ever find a monogamous mate to have children with since there just ain't enough people of the opposite sex. If 30% of the women in Gen Z are not going to have an opposite sex relationship, but 45% of men are also not going to have an opposite sex relationship... Then there's 15% of straight women who will likely have nowhere to sit at the end of the next round of sexual musical chairs. Now those 25 men and women would have to all have 4 children just to keep the population total as it currently is. You think people are aggressively trying to have large families? Most probably can't even afford it, and most are not willing to live like our ancestors before us, having larger families in poverty conditions and having to bust their asses like crazy potentially.... Modern people are pampered and lack any drive for stuff that was instinctive and natural to previous generations going back a few decades at least...

    Total population control tactic, that maybe people think is harmless but is quite insidious... In theory, anyone with a sense of morality would think "well.... we can't force them to change their biology" which is logical and reasonable. But to me, it's been a very long-term campaign of easing into aggressively shoving this sort of stuff down the collective throats of the masses to the point that an agenda has been obvious for so damn long that only the people who are so programmed/blinded by the appeal to morality/emotion/etc will not see it until it reaches such a critical point I suppose. I think that people don't even think about the logistics of it even in such a basic way, or think.. Well, if America's population goes from 333 million to 300 million over a relatively brief period of time? Who cares, right? I think that attitude would leave a population at a much smaller fraction of it's original numbers within a century or less. Perfect if you want to make that population that much easier to control tyrannically and absolutely through force and constant pervasive surveillance.

    In 2022, Gen Z's population was about 70 million. So... Figure out how many were female, and then take 30% of them out of the reproductive equation. That alone can lead to a huge population collapse from 70 million in future generations. Add in all of the other factors out there adding to the difficulty/improbability of two compatible straight people from having a child.
    You don't need to marry for kids
    Many lesbian couples use sperm donor
    https://youtu.be/6Q5ypMZ7miE?si=zN4f9l7EPQFsXgQb

    They have 3 kids from sperm donor.

  8. #8
    Junior Member Saitama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Last Online
    05-03-2024 @ 03:32 AM
    Ethnicity
    35% South Italian / 29% Finnish / 18% Norwegian / 8% Lithuanian/ 6% North Italy / 4% Sweden
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 30

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rajputprincess View Post
    You don't need to marry for kids
    Many lesbian couples use sperm donor
    https://youtu.be/6Q5ypMZ7miE?si=zN4f9l7EPQFsXgQb

    They have 3 kids from sperm donor.
    Fair enough. I still do see it as an intentional campaign for population control in the end. I don't think that's an unreasonable take, nor does it require some sort of hatred or prejudice. People fearing labels like that is why American and other societies will straight up collapse and turn into civil-war-ravaged dumpster fires over the next century with a spineless neutered society that will not bother to put up a fight. A society raised more and more by women is not going to be a balanced or efficiently functioning society IMO. Thinking we've got enough examples of blunders and dysfunction in modern societies due to that sort of growing influence.

    EDIT: Actually, think about how effeminate and lame the average man has slowly become - Which in turn even YOU are suspecting turns a fair number of women to the 'other side', no?... Besides more men being raised by two women and not a traditional biological male/female pairing, what else do you figure would cause this neutering of modern males? Not media influence? We're constantly being assaulted on all fronts in that regard. If you can't resist the "spells", you're gonna succumb to them in one way or another.

  9. #9
    Junior Member Straightman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2024
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:37 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Latin
    Ethnicity
    Romanian
    Country
    European Union
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 39
    Given: 196

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Hey Indian girl do you still live in India or have you moved to the bad ole USA? This study must be about the US youth and has nothing to do with India or other parts of the world. Are you gonna stop make believing you are American? And what is this b.s. with people and media all over the world talking about these generations invented by American sociologists, as if it applies to non-American generations as well? Do you know that one of the so called 'universal generations' is called 'The Greatest Generation' and refers to Americans who lived during great depression and ww2? Would Germans also refer to their Nazi era generation as their 'Greatest Generation'? Geez, how is nobody even thought about that?

  10. #10
    Junior Member Saitama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Last Online
    05-03-2024 @ 03:32 AM
    Ethnicity
    35% South Italian / 29% Finnish / 18% Norwegian / 8% Lithuanian/ 6% North Italy / 4% Sweden
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 30

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Straightman View Post
    Hey Indian girl do you still live in India or have you moved to the bad ole USA? This study must be about the US youth and has nothing to do with India or other parts of the world. Are you gonna stop make believing you are American? And what is this b.s. with people and media all over the world talking about these generations invented by American sociologists, as if it applies to non-American generations as well? Do you know that one of the so called 'universal generations' is called 'The Greatest Generation' and refers to Americans who lived during great depression and ww2? Would Germans also refer to their Nazi era generation as their 'Greatest Generation'? Geez, how is nobody even thought about that?
    That is true. But is the OP actually applying this article to her own location if she's not from the US? She can technically be presenting it as an outsider looking to discuss it. I don't particularly care if she (or maybe even he, who knows who anyone actually is on a site like this, many political and racial weirdos all around larping for whatever insane reasons they have lol) is even mocking the US or thinks that there's a virtue in everyone suddenly being gay regardless of any long-term implications for that society, be it a racial one or a multi-racial one. I'm not sure that India has the same media/political forces in their country that the US and similar countries do.

    So I'd imagine the average Indian man and woman is not necessarily intentionally programmed by their society even as early as 5 with books or drag queens visiting schools to teach children who are not even aware of any sexual concepts whatsoever to embrace the possibility for example of being a young gay girl rather than simply being a tom boy.. Or that they're born the wrong gender, or that they maybe like the opposite sex, etc.. At profoundly impressionable ages.

    I mean, tom boys used to exist. They probably still do, but the term is pretty much never used anymore, is it? Plenty of perfectly straight women grew up thinking they liked the opposite sex/that they were actually boys or wanted to be boys... But 9/10 they would literally continue to develop and "grow out of it"...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-21-2023, 07:17 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-04-2021, 04:30 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-24-2020, 06:26 PM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-20-2018, 10:47 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •