did Americans land on the moon ?

[Turul]

Hey, wait a sec! Hubble’s resolution is only 0.1 arcseconds, so the lander is way too small to be seen as anything more than a dot, even by Hubble. It would have to be a lot bigger to be seen at all. In fact, if you do the math (set Hubble’s resolution to 0.1 arcseconds and the distance to 400,000 kilometers) you see that Hubble’s resolution on the Moon is about 200 meters! In other words, even a football stadium on the Moon would look like a dot to Hubble.

Absolutely 100% pure bullchips. Stated by people who have zero fricking clue, and who are working on 100% assumption.

Has anyone ever seen the pics of nebula that were taken by Hubble? And you’re telling me it can’t see something on the Moon? ROFLMAO... Oh, that’s rich.

I spoke with some of the folks who designed Hubble and the Quickbird cameras.

Let me explain it this way. If there was a football stadium on the Moon, not only could Hubble see it, it could see the chewing gum left on the seat, and read the date off a penny sitting on the floor.

I’ll also tell you this for free. The real specs on the Quickbird cameras are classified. And it’s not the crappy resolution that is published for public consumption.

And Hubble is considered ‘outdated’ and ‘obsolete’ tech, and was when it was put up there. The 2nd generation stuff they were working on before Hubble even launched was exponentially better than the 1st gen stuff, which was pretty darn impressive. The stuff they have now is just absolutely amazing.

FYI: The Navy also uses Quickbird cameras on it’s ships. Just a little factoid tidbit for you.

[Odoacer]

but all people who believe this unsubstantiated wild theories seem to be hardcore religious nutthugers who would believe ANYTHING, well if they bought the Talking snake and virgin birth then what do u expect.

Is that so?

[Sturmgewehr]

@ Odoacer: Yup in most cases.

[Odoacer]

@ Odoacer: Yup in most cases.

Most of the moon hoaxers I've come haven't been religious. Including Turul, here.

[Der Steinadler]

I think the point here is that there are plenty high end commercial telescopes that SHOULD be able to see the footprints. In other words, they have high enough magnification. But every time it is tried, in the areas that are supposedly where the Apollo landers are, no one ever sees jack.

The film Capricorn One offers a searching tale into how the American government could actually hoax such an 'event'.

[Volkodav]

more lies, just like orbiting satelites around the earth (wtf?), a south pole, the flying santa claus, easter bunny and other fairy tales like that

[Sturmgewehr]

Most of the moon hoaxers I've come haven't been religious. Including Turul, here.

So ????

Most of the moon hoaxers I have come across have been religious nuts at least in 85% of the cases and 100% of the Moon Landing hoaxers I have met in person are religious nuts who believe the wildest conspiracies out there.

[Odoacer]

So ????

Most of the moon hoaxers I have come across have been religious nuts at least in 85% of the cases and 100% of the Moon Landing hoaxers I have met in person are religious nuts who believe the wildest conspiracies out there.

So your anecdote is anecdotal. up

[Sturmgewehr]

So your anecdote is anecdotal. up

As much as yours is.

[Odoacer]

As much as yours is.

Precisely.