The Race Ladder

[Mary]

This thread is posted on request by Loki.

For those of you who have not yet been initiated into racial awareness and introduced to the concept, I will briefly explain it.

All races can be put on a ladder according to their racial value. At the top we have higher races and below them, the lower races. Generally, the whiter you are, the higher you go on the ladder. The darker you are, the lower. Everything else is in between. Hence, it is a race ladder.

This is my slightly revised version:

Higher races:

Europeans
Whites in other parts of the world
Slavs
Indians (high caste)
Various "half-whites" (Maltese for example)
East Asians


Lower races:

Latinos
South Asians
Semites
Central Asians
Indians (low caste)
Blacks

Everyone who is below Whites and Europeans will try to climb the ladder, while kicking down on those below. This will happen through racial mixing, trying to pass off as a higher race than you really are, or simply crying "datz racis'!". Those above on the ladder can receive privilege from those below.

Contrary to common belief, I have not invented the race ladder. Research has been done on it before, and it is very easy to simply google for it, and find more material.

Post your take on racial hierarchies.

[Padre Organtino]

Slavs are not a race but a linguistic group of Europeans that is quite heterogenous despite common origins. High cast Indians are in general less Caucasoid and more distant from Europeans than the majority of "semites". East Asians are much more heterogenous than Caucasoids and lumping Philippinos and Japanese into one group is sort of absurd.

[Локи]

Interesting!

[Локи]

@ Mary

You are Russian and Slavic. Do you not consider yourself to be a European?

[Kanuni]

Yes it is interesting from a trolling perspective.

[Mary]

Slavs are not a race but a linguistic group of Europeans that is quite heterogenous despite common origins. High cast Indians are in general less Caucasoid and more distant from Europeans than the majority of "semites". East Asians are much more heterogenous than Caucasoids and lumpin Philippinos and Japanese into one group is sort of absurd.

First of all, I'm mostly talking about broader racial categories. Why? Because it makes sense. If we would divide all of the categories on the ladder into races and sub-races we would never see the end of it. The point of the race ladder is that it's supposed to be practical.

The main distinction between racial groups is the degree of subhumanism that they exhibit. What is subhumanism? It is exactly what it sounds like; savage and uncivilized behavior present in the racial group.

Slavs are actually a race. Although they differ from each other in minor ways, they are still very similar. As a Slav myself, I know this. A Serb can easily fit in Russia and vice versa.

Why are high caste Indian high on the ladder? I get asked this question a lot. Because they exhibit highly civilized behavior, which is demonstrated in the institutionalized worship of Aryan values. For example, a high caste Indian is not allowed to mix with the lower castes. This acts as a natural barrier to racial mixing. This is an example of why high caste Indians are placed among the higher races on the ladder.

Japanese go under East Asians.
Filipinos go under South Asians.

[Mary]

@ Mary

You are Russian and Slavic. Do you not consider yourself to be a European?

No, I'm not European, I'm Slavic. Contrary to common belief, Slavs are not European. Why is this? Well, lets go back to the level of subhumanism. Slavs simply exhibit more savage and uncivilized behavior than Europeans. That's why they get placed a step lower on the ladder. I'm sure just searching for Russian videos on the internet will show you what I'm talking about.

[Локи]

No, I'm not European, I'm Slavic. Contrary to common belief, Slavs are not European. Why is this? Well, lets go back to the level of subhumanism. Slavs simply exhibit more savage and uncivilized behavior than Europeans. That's why they get placed a step lower on the ladder. I'm sure just searching for Russian videos on the internet will show you what I'm talking about.

Well I happen to know a lot about Russian history, so I am not as easily fooled. I also have many Russian friends.

If it wasn't for Russia, Europe would have been overrun my Mongoloid hordes a long time ago.

[zack]

[Padre Organtino]

First of all, I'm mostly talking about broader racial categories. Why? Because it makes sense. If we would divide all of the categories on the ladder into races and sub-races we would never see the end of it. The point of the race ladder is that it's supposed to be practical.

The main distinction between racial groups is the degree of subhumanism that they exhibit. What is subhumanism? It is exactly what it sounds like; savage and uncivilized behavior present in the racial group.

Slavs are actually a race. Although they differ from each other in minor ways, they are still very similar. As a Slav myself, I know this. A Serb can easily fit in Russia and vice versa.

Why are high caste Indian high on the ladder? I get asked this question a lot. Because they exhibit highly civilized behavior, which is demonstrated in the institutionalized worship of Aryan values. For example, a high caste Indian is not allowed to mix with the lower castes. This acts as a natural barrier to racial mixing. This is an example of why high caste Indians are placed among the higher races on the ladder.

Japanese go under East Asians.
Filipinos go under South Asians.

A German and a Finn that know Russian can fit there even easier. There's no such thing as a "Slavic" race. Slavs happen to share some common culture and have related languages but that's all. And I see no point in artificially separating them from the other Euros. In the same way one could argue that Germanics or Latins are special races.
High Cast Indians behave much alike certain "Semites" like Jews. They are quite witty and smart but have utter aversion towards physical labour and tend to form lobbying groups. BTW Jews also show substantial degree of racialism and ethnocentrism when it comes to choosing mating partners.