0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,755 Given: 1,407 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,613 Given: 356 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,070 Given: 10,740 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 215 Given: 77 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,755 Given: 1,407 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,980 Given: 1,061 |
5.86
Here you have, at the bottom :
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/europe...logroups.shtml
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,613 Given: 356 |
lol I like your blunt statements. They nice
Egypt has experienced several invasions during its history. However, these do not seem to account for more than about 10% overall of current Egyptians ancestry when the DNA evidence of the ancient mitochondrial DNA and modern Y chromosomes is considered. While Afrocentrists such as Ivan van Sertima argue that the Egyptians were primarily Africoid before the many conquests of Egypt diluted the Africanity of the Egyptian people, other scholars such as Frank Yurco believe that Modern Egyptians are largely representative of the ancient population, and the DNA evidence appears to support this view.
Results of genetic studies is consistent with the historical record, which records significant bidirectional contact between Egypt and Nubia, and the Levant/Near East within the last few thousand years, but with general population continuity from the Early Dynastic period up to the modern day era.
http://genapps.uchicago.edu/labweb/pubs/krings.pdf
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...3.00057.x/full
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,755 Given: 1,407 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,070 Given: 10,740 |
This still stands true IMO. Even if Egyptians are not of significant recent Arabian ancestry, Moroccans are still very likely the least Arabian influenced in North Africa. The y-dna frequencies show this. Also, since most (if not all) Arab conquerors would have been male, seeing very little J1 in Moroccans means very limited Arabian ancestry.In general. Moroccans are the least Arab people of all North Africa.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks