Society and Miscegenators

[SouthernBoy]

@Sothernboy sorry I'm not prolife so we'll just have to disagree on that one

Is it alright to abort fetuses that aren't mixed too?

[Skandi]

Now that's a misunderstanding, I was refering only to those that were mixed, and you can check before birth. Sorry if that caused a tangle.

It is allright but that is entirely up to the parents and not the state

[SouthernBoy]

Now that's a misunderstanding, I was refering only to those that were mixed, and you can check before birth. Sorry if that caused a tangle.

I understood you.

It is allright but that is entirely up to the parents and not the state

I'm assuming we're still talking hypothetically here.

What if the father wants an abortion but the mother doesn't? What happens?

[Skandi]

What if the father wants an abortion but the mother doesn't? What happens?

It get's more difficult there as if you had a law where the Father could force an abortion through mothers just wouldn't say untill it was too late that they were pregnant. An abortion is also a full anasthetic operation and does have risks associated with it, which of course the father does not have to take.

In essence I believe it is the womans choice as she is the only one who will be hurt/damaged by the decision, but my solution would be that if the objection was noted early enough say within 8 weeks then the woman would have a choice of aborting or keeping the child but getting no financial support from the father. He in turn would have no rights over the child
(This would not apply to couples who were married btw)

[Æmeric]

Can't be bothered with finding the actual data at the moment; however, it's upwards of 70% of bi-racial unions that end up in single mother status who are already sucking the welfare teet: given that these foolish women are already dirt poor, where will they come up with the money?



As stated/implied, the remaining 30% of bi-racial unions that actually remain together in some form of civil union are already impoverished.


They are then left optionless: with the exception of robbing you and I blind.

I don't think I was trying to be fair. The assumption of people who have applied to me is that there would be a welfare state to support the mothers and children, well there wouldn't be, in my world there would instead be jobs found for them and no benifits payed otehrwise, if they didn't work and turned to crime, well I think the Victorians had a good idea there.

This is another option I didn't mention in my previous post but have brought up many times before:VOLUNTARY STERILIZATION. Not just for miscegenators but also for the irresponsible members of the White underclass. End all welfare benifits that discourage the formation of the tradition nuclear family & substitutes the government as the surrogate father. And then offer to pay people to have themselves voluntarily sterilize. Lets say we offer $50,000 to a childless woman to have herself sterilized. $50,000 is cheap compared to what the taxpayers would have to fork out to support a child born to the kind of woman that would take up this offer. Not to mention other costs like a public education that would be wasted on the child. And the longterm social benefits e.g. less crime in the future, fewer people incarcerated. Maybe $25,000 to a woman with one child. Also make the same offer to men but a lesser amount since they don't actually have babies. The people I have in mind would be disproportionately of color. Some of them would volunteer for sterilization for the price of a wide screen HDTV. This sort of policiy would make much more sense then the current one where we are subsidizing our own dispossession.

We would still have people like Paris Hilton & Brittney Spears but they are not dependent on the taxpayer & do provide some entertainment value.


@SouthernBoy: I don't care about the lives of the Negroes & Latinos already in the US, while should I care about their unborn?

[SouthernBoy]

In essence I believe it is the womans choice as she is the only one who will be hurt/damaged by the decision...

What if the woman wants an abortion and the man doesn't?

(This would not apply to couples who were married btw)

What would happen if a wife wanted an abortion and her husband didn't?

I don't care about the lives of the Negroes & Latinos already in the US, while should I care about their unborn?

It's the right thing to do.

[Skandi]

What if the woman wants an abortion and the man doesn't? What would happen if a wife wanted an abortion and her husband didn't?

Again you can't legislate here because it would be impossible to enforce, but if he wants the child and she doesn't then it should be handed over at birth and the same rules would apply as in the other scenario.

[SouthernBoy]

Again you can't legislate here because it would be impossible to enforce, but if he wants the child and she doesn't then it should be handed over at birth and the same rules would apply as in the other scenario.

"Impossible to enforce?" I doubt that.

You're answer is quite refreshing though. Most answer, "Too bad." Nevermind all the fathers whose sons and daughters have been aborted without their consent and sometimes even without their knowledge. It's difficult to imagine anything worse.

[Psychonaut]

This is another option I didn't mention in my previous post but have brought up many times before:VOLUNTARY STERILIZATION.

Did you ever hear about this group: Project Prevention?

They pay drug addicts $200 dollars for voluntary sterilization. And, according to this article:

Of the 158 women who were either temporarily or permanently sterilized, approximately 60% of them were Black or Latina.

[Æmeric]

Never heard of them. I'm surprised they haven't had more media attention advocating a controversial measure. And $200 is cheap!