0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9 Given: 0 |
Well based upon the current borders of Hungary and this map:
I chose somewhat unjust. There are majority Hungarian areas that were left out even though they are directly adjacent to modern day Hungary. Those areas should have been included in Hungary.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 107 Given: 78 |
A rebellion of serfs against their nobility (most of whom were Croatian, or Habsburg to begin with) cannot be interpreted in the context of modern ethnic feuds. Lines of association were simply different back then, class and social estate were the primary defining factors, and such (actually understandable) revolts were relatively frequent in the stormy XVIth Century.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
Tahy - Croatian nobility?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Just
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,424 Given: 12,676 |
Funny thing is that the member Joe McCarthy (whom did the OP in this thread), was one of the first members to welcome me here in the forum (in 2011). Now he has gone away.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Vlahs and Serbs took lands they never had in history I guess it’s what make Hungarians frustrated and think that’s not just
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
With this treaty, Hungarians have lost their historical lands mostly to Orthodox nations like Serbia and Romania. Sevres was a bit the same, it was also designed by French and wanted to give lands historically controlled by Turkic states (Seljuk, Ottoman) and principalities (Beyliks) to fabricated nations. Mustafa Kemal and the Young Turks squad ripped Sevres which Istanbul had to accept.
Hungarians must suffer result of their alliance with Germans who lost the war. Today there are millions of Hungarians who are minority in neighboring Serbia, Romanian, Slovakia etc.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks