Gay Marine’s homecoming kiss goes viral

[The Lawspeaker]

Ummm catholicism or islam aren´t protestant faith, either. In fact almost all church crime were directly opposed to christian faith. And communism and national socialism both clearly were opposed to the bible and its God. Bibles were forbidden and churches closed in the Sovjet Union and bible believing Christians were persecuted in Nazi Germany, as people that lived in that time haved personally told me....

Catholic crimes definitely don´t have more to do with Christianity in it´s original sense than communism and national socialism have to with atheism.

So all that is left is your simply wrong, uneducated, baseless "exegetic" nonsense...

Bollocks. Yes they were persecuted because they belonged to another ideology. God (or should we say more accurately: the Pope) was replaced by the Fuehrer. Same shit.. different name.

[ficuscarica]

Well, if that´s true I guess that has more to do with your ideology than with mine. Because at least they worshipped a human being, which unlike you I don´t... Don´t forget communism, they killed more people than all Catholic popes together and they clearly declared themselves atheists.

[Falkata]

What about hypermasculine homosexual soldiers?

You should see the gays who go to my gym. Their biceps are bigger than their heads

[Hevneren]

The guy served his country. He can kiss who he wants. I do not have issue with this PDA, in theory.

That said, the picture grosses me out. I can see why some people are bothered by it. This is coming from a person who is pro gay rights, mind you.

Nonetheless, I have to err on the side of his right to love who he wants as long as the person he has chosen is another consenting adult. This includes the notion of PDAs.

It may have gone over better if they'd each given each other a simple hug and small kiss. This kiss is somewhat obnoxious, lol

I think being a more reserved person and being brought up to be more reserved about public displays of affection (PDA), I would probably not kiss like these two men did, with a woman in public. I don't think them being gay is a big deal though. It's just different cultures and general behaviour when it comes to showing affection.

I might kiss my woman in a discreet way if we were in public, but I wouldn't make a big deal out of it. I don't like being looked at by strangers, so it's just a matter of comfort level for me.

[Hevneren]

@Hevneren: Pretty embarassing to post about the bible when you don´t even understand the most basic exegetic rules.... I like free speech, one reason being its use in exposing the utter stupidity of uneducated people that talk about things they don´t have a clue about. Your posting is so stupid I don´t even know what to begin with...

Name what exactly I got wrong about the Bible. Disprove that the Old Testament contains passages condemning the eating of shellfish and working on the sabbath, while there's not a single word condemning the sexual abuse and rape of children. Disprove that slavery - including sexual slavery - is acceptable in Biblical scripture. Disprove that the Bible cites a story in which the ancient Israelites - with Yahweh/Jehova on their side - exterminate the Malachites (genocide).

The whole incest theme seems to be worth its own paragraph. Disprove that Lot had incestuous sex with his daughters and that for the story of Adam and Eve to be true, the children and grandchildren etc. of Adam and Eve would've had incestuous sex with each other since the dawn of time in order to create 7 billion people. Thus, the Bible promotes incest. The entire creation of mankind is based on incest according to your Bible.

Furthermore, the animals (apart from the sheep) that Noah had with him on the Ark, were only two and two. Again, the bible promotes incest because the animals would've had to mate with their own "family".

Maybe I'm crazy, but I view a man kissing another man as less harmful than generations of incest, pedophilia, slavery, genocide and the like.

[SilverKnight]

wtf so what? what's the big deal?? I bet if it was a female kissing another female " it wouldn't be so bad ".

[Hevneren]

Yet atheist ideologies remain unrivaled in the number of victims, although they only had a few decades and not a few thousand years to make those astonishing achievements...

Not to forget that a christian in the true sense of the word - that means a follower of Christ - won´t identify with what the catholic church or some crazy reformers did. And I don´t think it´s necessary to show how nothing could be farther away from christian beliefs than islam.

What are Atheist ideologies? Communism? No, it has nothing to do with non-belief. Nazism? No, it was mostly made up of Catholics and other believers. Fascism? No, Catholics again.

[Hevneren]

Name what exactly I got wrong about the Bible. Disprove that the Old Testament contains passages condemning the eating of shellfish and working on the sabbath, while there's not a single word condemning the sexual abuse and rape of children. Disprove that slavery - including sexual slavery - is acceptable in Biblical scripture. Disprove that the Bible cites a story in which the ancient Israelites - with Yahweh/Jehova on their side - exterminate the Malachites (genocide).

The whole incest theme seems to be worth its own paragraph. Disprove that Lot had incestuous sex with his daughters and that for the story of Adam and Eve to be true, the children and grandchildren etc. of Adam and Eve would've had incestuous sex with each other since the dawn of time in order to create 7 billion people. Thus, the Bible promotes incest. The entire creation of mankind is based on incest according to your Bible.

Furthermore, the animals (apart from the sheep) that Noah had with him on the Ark, were only two and two. Again, the bible promotes incest because the animals would've had to mate with their own "family".

Maybe I'm crazy, but I view a man kissing another man as less harmful than generations of incest, pedophilia, slavery, genocide and the like.

And let's not forget Yahweh's fondness for ritual sacrifice and infanticide. Abraham was told to prove his devotion and faith by sacrificing his only son. The sacrifice was stopped, but still it points to an immoral view on devotion and faith. Jephthah sacrificed his daughter, because he'd promised the Lord that if He helped him slaughter the Amonites, he'd sacrifice whomever came out of his home first to greet him.

[YOUTUBE]Pt66kbYmXXk[/YOUTUBE]

I can't wait to see Ficuscarica defending the "perfect" absolute morality of the story of Jephthah or any of the other passages mentioned in the clip above.

[BiałaZemsta]

[ficuscarica]

Many of your "objections" would never have been made if you understood that simply because a book tells a story it doesn´t support what the participants of that story did...