British Isles (English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh)
French
Iberians (Spaniards and Portuguese)
Italians
Sicilians
Maltese
Greeks
Cypriots
South Slavs (Serbs, Bulgarians, Croatians etc)
Albanians
Germans and Dutch
Hungarians
Scandinavians (Danes, Swedes, Norwegians)
Finns
Poles
Czechs and Slovakians
Ukrainians
Belarusians
Romanians and Moldovans
Northern Caucasus (Chechens, Ingush, etc.)
Georgians
Armenians
Turks
Levantines (Syrians, Lebanese, Jordanians)
Arabians (Saudis, Yemenis, etc)
Maghrebi North Africans (Morocco-Tunisia)
Libyans and Egyptians
Iranians
Assyrians
Ethiopians, Eritreans and Somalis
Afghans and Pakistanis
North Indians
Castizos (1/4 Amerindian, 3/4 European) if they look white
Quadroons (1/4 African, 3/4 European) if they look white
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
I already figure new members asking you something like "how dare you to get an avatar of that bastard muslim Khomeini and then claiming toi be an European proud defender??"
True , just think of Jefferson , if he could do that then anyone else could have do that too.
Imho only Britons from Australia can claim to be of pure European stock since the natives over there were much fewer than Blacks in USA and enough sub-human to discourage any race-mixing.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,268 Given: 92 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 33 Given: 0 |
Please, the offspring of European-Congoid mixing have always been considered 'black'. We maintained a very effective colorline until the last generation.
As regards to Jenna Bush & her oversized malars; I started a thread on the topic at the Althing (now Skadi) last year. Dalton had an interesting theory on the topic.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
Classic and Silly. One can take many pictures of italians and compare with southern american mestizos and say they are twins.
argentinean mestizo vs. white man
Twins? No. Just a resemblance.
Khomeini is NOT WHITE (at least for european standards). Resemblance is just that, a resemblance.
As I said Europe is already a racial mess, including Portugal. No big deal as long as the ambiguous population stay as a minority.
I see no difference between both person below.Can't you see the indid, azeri influence in those people? They scream it.
The girls is the same as Amadinejad. Both share the same indid/azeri influenced look. The difference is that she is good looking, light skinned and have a VERY NOTICEABLE NOSE JOB. Other than that they are the exact same thing.
As for Italy, they can't be close to 100% pure european. Their blood is "polluted" by mediterranean blood. Thanks to Roman Empire and USSR, There is no place in Europe where the europeans remain totally european.
Last edited by dfot; 07-17-2009 at 07:42 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9 Given: 1 |
You forgot about Attilla the Hun, Gengis Khan and others
And about Persians, well some persons consider them as Indo-Europeans and ofcourse they are, but rather only in cultural aspect. From the begining of Persian ethnicity Indo-European element were in minority(Nobles), next centuries and "interactions" with different invaders and conqered people made from Persians very mixed people. Ofcourse beetwen semitic and other non-European elements are still descendants of ancient Indo-Europeans .
Personally I treat such people as my distant kin from the same European stock.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
Again?I think you'te trolling here , Amadinejad is a swarthy Iranian that could pass for a Pakistani but the woman is of Mediterranean subrace , neither Azeri nor Indid in them , the Azeri typical look is similar to that of Armenoid , generally , even some of them are Euro-looking , like this guy
According to Eupedia link Italy's genetic make-up is about 95% pure Euro stock , we had a major mixing during the Roman Empire age but even there most slaves were from British Isles Gallia and Germany , others , a minority , being from North Africa and Middle East but keep in mind that at that time the Med southern shore was much whiter than today , muslim-arabic-semitic expasion was still to come.As for Italy, they can't be close to 100% pure european. Their blood is "polluted" by mediterranean blood.
What does USSR matters?Thanks to Roman Empire and USSR, There is no place in Europe where the europeans remain totally european.
commies never really advocate mass immigration or multiracial ideology as western countries instead do nowadays , they were just unaware of racial identity (on the political surface because they were culturally...).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
The mediterranean subrace is meaningless in defining the european racial pool. One can be mediterranid and not fit in Europe. The West Asia and India have a seizable population which can be depicted as mediterranind even though they should not be welcome in. The maintenance of european diversity in regard to genetics and appearance not only requires to keep them from blacks or mongoloids but foreign caucasoids as well. Summing everything up: she's not white. Neither is your "white" looking iranian. His autosomal DNA would reveal that.
According to Eupedia Italy is 58%. Bring one thing to your mind: northern africans and middle eastern were never white. As long as you cannot get rid of such heritage you act soft by telling they were once white. BS.According to Eupedia link Italy's genetic make-up is about 95% pure Euro stock , we had a major mixing during the Roman Empire age but even there most slaves were from British Isles Gallia and Germany , others , a minority , being from North Africa and Middle East but keep in mind that at that time the Med southern shore was much whiter than today , muslim-arabic-semitic expasion was still to come.
Last edited by dfot; 07-18-2009 at 03:23 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
Unmixed Berbers are indistinguishable from Iberians.Originally Posted by dfot
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks