British Isles (English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh)
French
Iberians (Spaniards and Portuguese)
Italians
Sicilians
Maltese
Greeks
Cypriots
South Slavs (Serbs, Bulgarians, Croatians etc)
Albanians
Germans and Dutch
Hungarians
Scandinavians (Danes, Swedes, Norwegians)
Finns
Poles
Czechs and Slovakians
Ukrainians
Belarusians
Romanians and Moldovans
Northern Caucasus (Chechens, Ingush, etc.)
Georgians
Armenians
Turks
Levantines (Syrians, Lebanese, Jordanians)
Arabians (Saudis, Yemenis, etc)
Maghrebi North Africans (Morocco-Tunisia)
Libyans and Egyptians
Iranians
Assyrians
Ethiopians, Eritreans and Somalis
Afghans and Pakistanis
North Indians
Castizos (1/4 Amerindian, 3/4 European) if they look white
Quadroons (1/4 African, 3/4 European) if they look white
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,614 Given: 4,516 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 143 Given: 2 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 758 Given: 660 |
On females maybe but not on guys. Dark, hairy and even some bald guys look masculine.
Gedrosia isn't synonymous with the old South Asian component. It is specific to South Central Asians but found at substantial levels in West Asia.
The old South Asian average in West Asians v3 k=12:
Turks 2.3%
Armenians :2.8%
Kurds:10%
Georgians: 0.1%
In k12b run SA is 1-0% for all the above.
Gedrosia average in the new run k12b:
Turkish: 13.4%
Armenians: 16.8%
Georgians: 16.9%
Kurds: 28.7%
Im sorry to burst your bubble but the pic you linked of Gattuso still doesn't look whiter than the 1/4 Japanese guy.
Gattuso has wheatish fair skin tone, the pic you linked:
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12 Given: 0 |
They are dark-skinned according to my experience as well. When I was in Turkey, though, I knew nothing about Apricity and such forums back then and didn't pay attention to whiteness and such things lol
But I remember that considering that Turks have much Armenian and Greek ancestry, I expected to see something similar, but I remember I was surprised to see very different people and even the lighter ones had some not understandable features. Even the darkest Greek, Armenian or Georgian still have purely Caucasoid features, while in their case, there was something non-harmonic, and it's because they are very mixed and mixed with representatives of different races.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 758 Given: 660 |
There is no such saying, I would know right.
Believe it or not, in Turkey those who are swarthy, tall and hairy are said to have Armenian roots. I'm not saying its the case but that's the saying here.
In Turkey the most prevalent hair color is all shades of brown from very dark brown to medium light brown. Jet black hair is greatly admired.
My aunt married a Turkish guy of Tatar roots from Eskisehir and in his family there are mostly blond with blue or green eyes.
Their son (my cousin)
He's a bit older here and his hair turned into light brown:
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,495 Given: 1,101 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 758 Given: 660 |
I'm not sure about that, here are results of two Turks I know from the old run:
South Asian component:
Western Turk from Izmir: 1.8%
Eastern Turk: 0%
Btw, Western Turks score the highest Turkic score because the original Turks first settled in the Western and Central parts of Asia Minor.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12 Given: 0 |
That's a Turkish saying and was used before Genocide times, so you wouldn't know.
Of course I wouldn't believe it, because this is not the first time you have proven your ultimate hatred towards Armenians and I believe what I've seen with my own eyes. First time I saw brown colored people in my life that was in Turkey and I've been in quite Western and Northern parts as well.
I can swear that when learning we are Armenians, your Turkish men were making marriage proposals, so hardly they have any such prejudice against Armenians. Throughout centuries Turks were after Armenian women, abducting them to harems and so on, so speak according to facts and not your wishes.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks