0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 417 Given: 509 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 153 Given: 39 |
Zimbabwe represents opportunity to the rich.
Zim = people, = markets, = mining, = farming etc. There's always something to steal, even when niggers break everything, one can rebuild what they broken under the guise of "humanitarian assistance".
You profit easily by #1, taxing the First World Country to pay for this "charity", #2 enslaving that country to the IMF and World Bank via loans which they cannot afford. Basic Imperialism 101. Nothing complicated about this.
Sweatshops. They're luvin it. At least their local bosses (not to mention the US elites) get rich from it.I thought a lot of third worlders benefited from outsourcing and immigration policy of modern US.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 118 Given: 0 |
Really? I'd like to see exactly what you think the 'racial situation' is in Russia. There is no burgeoning underclass of halfcastes born to unmarried Russian mothers, for instance, and in contrast with things here.
LoL, that's pretty desperate an assertion, Joe! Putin put a few villains in the nick, and exiled others. They happened to be Jews. But this is hardly the only impressive thing to our minds (assuming I'm a 'rightist' which you normally condemn me for NOT being! ); chief to the nationalist is his emphasis on Russian sovereignty, meaning a refusal to go along with all the globalising trends in economics, politics and social issues, to the chagrin of the 'West'.The basis of Putin's support among Western rightists is anti-Semitism (Putin put a couple of Jews in jail.
Interesting. I suppose this demonstrates that the thing to do when faced with these protests is just to hold your nerve, and not buy into the panic-mongering rumours of iminent revolt. Putin passes the test, the bluff is called. up
The lower Volga (beyond Nizhny Novgorod) wasn't even Russian settled at the time, anyway. It was home to various Finnics, Ugrics and Bulgars.
Nonsense. They settled the lands that were suited to their subsistence pattern. They had no need for the forested zone, but kept to the familiar steppe, to which their economy was tailored. Accusations of primitive savagery do NOT ring true, as they founded several states lasting centuries, whose ethnoses are still present and thriving. You yourself point out the advantages of their namestnik system of governance!They have not applied settlement policies in other parts of Russia simply because they were not sufficiently far thinking thus proving that they were a bunch of savages with no long term goals.
This is now wandering into the dull commonplaces of western writers anxious to find something special and 'oriental' and exotic in the Russians. :yawn:I think that nobody can deny the fact that the mongol "occupation" had a major impact on russian culture and mentality.
Trite...One can say that mongols brought to Russia the concept of oriental despotism which was a major success right up until Peter the Great,
How was Ivan III SO amazingly different and 'oriental' in comparison with his pre-Mongol ancestors like Vladimir I or Yuri Dolgoruky? Or even RYURIK, who was a 'WESTERNER' anyway!?!?
Nonsense. You need to come and spend a night in an English town, if you want to see some alcoholism and violence. ... And yet I don't remember when the Tatars came here...MO mongol influence is also responsible for the violent nature of the russian and his recklessness. Alcoholism is another phenomenon which can be related to mongol influence.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 54 Given: 0 |
Well, let's compare Russia and France as France is often seen to have the worst demographic prospects in Europe. Ethnic French have a higher birthrate than Russians and the Islamic projections are actually worse in Russia than in France. And that isn't even counting the Chinese in the Russian Far East. More here:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/gro...scussionid=432
This Putin-Russia stuff extends well beyond you, Loki, or this forum and I don't mean to pick on you guys in particular. If anyone is to blame for this 'Russia is the last hope of the white race' theory it is David Duke, and his most vocal followers are usually American white nationalists. I've been encountering this Russia stuff for years in multiple venues.LoL, that's pretty desperate an assertion, Joe! Putin put a few villains in the nick, and exiled others. They happened to be Jews. But this is hardly the only impressive thing to our minds (assuming I'm a 'rightist' which you normally condemn me for NOT being!
Last edited by Joe McCarthy; 03-12-2012 at 05:34 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 66 Given: 0 |
I doubt Joe's real problem with Putin is immigration. The US is overrun with 3rd world scum and I don't hear him bashing Obama over it. This is really about Putin not going along with the Neocons pro-war and pro-Israel agenda.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 54 Given: 0 |
I'm concerned about Russian demographics for racial reasons and security reasons. A Russia dominated by Chinese-Muslims is likely to be even more anti-Western.
In any event, there is more than enough reason to detest Putin on his foreign policy alone for a good white man. Neo-Nazis will probably defend arming China against the US, but then they're neo-Nazis...
Thumbs Up |
Received: 417 Given: 509 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 417 Given: 509 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 54 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21 Given: 0 |
I wonder how Putin will behave once European nationalists start coming into power across the continent. Will he side with them or condemn them for Nazism? Like when he condemned one of the Baltic states for tearing down a Soviet statue and likened it to Nazi Germany.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks