After birth" abortions now being considered

[Leliana]

That isn't true, especially early term. It's basically a blob of flesh.

A 'blob of flesh' needs cells who split and work to keep the 'blob' alive and growing, a working bloodstream achieved by a beating heart to provide and distribute the needed energy and a central nervous system which operates and controls all of these processes. Every single point is given in unborn babies even in embryonal phase!

That's what we call 'life'.

[The Lawspeaker]

Just wait, soon one will be allowed to terminate their ten year old.

The article isn't there and from the looks of the website it was probably an article that should be taken in jest as it was probably just scaremongering.

[Trog]

A 'blob of flesh' needs cells who split and work to keep the 'blob' alive and growing, a working bloodstream achieved by a beating heart to provide and distribute the needed energy and a central nervous system which operates and controls all of these processes. Every single point is given in unborn babies even in embryonal phase!

That's what we call 'life'.

Indeed, we're all just "blobs of flesh", but the intricate work that goes on whilst the baby develops inside the womb is miraculous. Nature, by default, prioritises the infants needs more than the mother. The womb should be the most sacred, most safest place in the world. Instead we permit surgical tools to be inserted so that the baby is decapitated, mutilated and then sucked out.

Yeah, some blob;

[Grumpy Cat]

I support this motion. There are some people who deserve this.

[The Lawspeaker]

I support this motion. There are some people who deserve this.

99 percent of all politicians and bankers. It would be a nice start.

[Trog]

I support this motion. There are some people who deserve this.

yeah, YOU!

Actually, I'm getting too emotional about this subject, but this type of unrevised response just gets on my nerves. What kind of person says this kind of thing?

[Susi]

Indeed, we're all just "blobs of flesh", but the intricate work that goes on whilst the baby develops inside the womb is miraculous. Nature, by default, prioritises the infants needs more than the mother. The womb should be the most sacred, most safest place in the world. Instead we permit surgical tools to be inserted so that the baby is decapitated, mutilated and then sucked out.

Yeah, some blob;

That's late term....

Early term :

[Rochefaton]

There is a word for after birth abortion: murder.

[Trog]

That's late term....

It's late term that's the core of this discussion. Indeed, it's FULL-TERM!

[jerney]

On this, we agree.

Scuze me while I go upchuck somewhere.

There is never any excuse for a partial birth abortion.....ever!!

What if the mother's health is at risk?

Regarding the article, I only scanned it, but I thought this part was particularly amusing and disturbing at the same time (which also makes me wonder if it is actually satire):

They write that adoption isn’t the necessarily the answer because “we also need to consider the interests of the mother who might suffer psychological distress from giving her child up for adoption.”

And the ability or disability of the newborn is not the issue because “having a child can itself be an unbearable burden for the psychological health of the woman or for her already existing children, regardless of the condition of the fetus.”

Because you know, a woman killing her full-term, fully healthy baby wouldn't cause any psychological distress for the average mother..