Online, liberals far less tolerant than normal people

[Sikeliot]

Doesn't change the parallelism of my example just because I got the word mixed up.

Here are the parallelisms.

Dog//Human
German Shepherd, St Bernard, etc. // Negroid, Caucasoid, Mongoloid

Breed is the one parallel with race.

[Kazimiera]

I think extremists of any kind, whether right or left are people who are looking for a legitimate way to express their negative emotions.

I think many of these people don't even know what it is they hate. And it is this hatred which leads them to extremist groups which give them a platform where they can spew negativity and get applauded for it by other haters.

I don't care whether you are left wing or right wing, but the fact that you will go to extremes to obliterate and exterminate someone else is an indication that there is something seriously wrong.

I can see the sense in both left and right wing politics and have nothing against either. What I do have a problem with however, is people who willingly put blinkers on and go to extremes.

[Quorra]

Yes, I came up as a leftist moderate fascist. I'd prefer a more pure capitalism though and that would be more anarchist, probably with a bit fascism thrown in. up

If you look at the modern western political, bureaucratic and corporate culture, it resembles more so a fascist state under the guise of democracy. Rather then the so called mixed democratic, capitalist, socialist mix. High taxes, large governments, large bureaucracy, revolving door for politicians, bureaucrats and corporate heads. Equals, a system that has been fully corrupted by greed.

I call it a Liberal fascist state, where the liberal left and right dog whistle to the extreme ends of the populace for votes, and to cower it's critics into obedience.

I completely agree. For America particularly. It's as fascist in it's economic model as Israel is in all else. Which is utterly.

[Supreme American]

Of course races can mix. Race to us is like the concept of "species" to other animals.. different species of cat can breed too but it doesn't change that they are of different species.. although I am not sure how different their DNA is from one another, like the DNA of different races of humans is indeed distinguishable.

Race is NOT a social construct. Just because whites did not know about blacks until relatively recent times does not mean that they are not two different races. With mixed race people, they have the chance of, at times, looking solely one race or the other due to their combination of genes, but it doesn't change that they are mixed. Apart from mixed folk, your DNA test results on 23andme DO tell what you look like.. if you score "100% African" you'd better believe you'll look black, same as if you score 100% European.

Well let's get to the bottom of all this:

The only time the left argues that "race doesn't exist" is when they are faced with white folks like us who cherish our heritage and want to preserve it.

Do they say this when Mexicans call themselves a "raza" and are proud of their heritage? Do they say it with blacks who technically define themselves as how their old slave masters did? How about with Arabs? The Arabic language didn't even exist 2000 years ago.

There is not one racial, cultural, linguistic, or ethnic group on this earth that you could not say that against. No, rather, we are told to cherish and preserve every non-white "indigenous" group out there in general and told to respect their self-identification in specific. Yet ours is continually trashed.

I have read Critical Race Theory literature which specifically states that while all races "don't exist," they only attack the identity of whites. They don't attack the identity of blacks due to the therapeutic benefit that puffing up black identity has for them. One of the books I checked out of my college library explicitly stated this.

This is very designed and very planned, and there are specific reasons that they only unleash such "you don't exist" arguments against whites who hold fast to their identity. What does accepting such arguments result in? If we don't think we exist, then there's nothing to preserve, and thus nothing to resist losing as we're displaced and mixed out of existence. This is ingrained enough at least in white liberals I have spoken to that I have been told wacky things like, "Everything ends," and, "We won't lose our heritage, we'll still remember our Irish ancestors," "We aren't dying off, we're being enriched," and of course, "Only Nazis talk like you."

[Supreme American]

I think extremists of any kind, whether right or left are people who are looking for a legitimate way to express their negative emotions.

Or perhaps they see such a decline in society that they think perhaps that only more extreme measures are what may rescue it.

[Norse Sword]

Apricity is not a Nazi or racist site, I have made this very clear on many occasions.

NO it is only RACIST when EUROPEANS want to preserve their culture, so in effect, no matter how you want to spin it, the libertard media will always report, condemn, slander, and seek to undermine and consider European cultural preservation RACIST whether you can accept that or not.

Sorry, there are no two ways about it. Time for every European to decide which side of the road they park on.

[jerney]

I'd label myself as a Liberal. If you say I'm intolerant, this is completely implacable and unappeasable, Die!

I've heard liberals defend themselves from those claims by saying that they're not intolerant of opposing views, but rather "only intolerant of other peoples intolerance!" Um, ok.

[Grumpy Cat]

I've been unfriended by a conservative for not being as conservative as him. I am not really a full-blown liberal. On some things, I am conservative, some, I am liberal.

But liberals can be real assholes online. I actually find many of the liberals in the anthro forum world to be absolutely intolerable. Although if you go over to the Heathen forum world, those with conservative political views are the intolerable ones.

[Supreme American]

The political left has never been tolerant. What they are "tolerant" toward are themselves and those they champion and nobody else.

[Supreme American]

I've heard liberals defend themselves from those claims by saying that they're not intolerant of opposing views, but rather "only intolerant of other peoples intolerance!" Um, ok.

Same thing by another name. You can't say you're tolerant while being intolerant. Tolerance is a new left catchword meant those who embrace alternative lifestylers and like our borders being flooded. It's very ideologically specific, and it not open-ended by any stretch of the imagination.