0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
Get a mosque u two...
Thumbs Up |
Received: 47 Given: 0 |
Is anal sex allowed by the Bible by the way? I thought sodomites weren´t very appreciated
Thumbs Up |
Received: 272 Given: 132 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,487 Given: 1,282 |
No, anal is not forbidden. Where did you get this from?
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...ersion=NIV198422 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...ersion=NIV19841 Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry.[a] 2 But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband. 3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband’s body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. 5 Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
Commentary here: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...&postcount=609
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/220119.htm
If God intended any kind of heterosexual sex (except abominations, see below) to be forbidden then the Bible would say so.
The sex that is forbidden is the following:
Spoiler!
You can contrast this with Islam:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_anal_sexThe hadith are reports of Muhammad's sayings and deeds from those close to him in his lifetime. Hadiths on the subject of anal intercourse between individuals clearly state that it is strictly forbidden. The majority in Islam, the four Sunni schools unanimously disapprove anal intercourse [4][5] as several hadith state:
"If anyone [resorts to a diviner and believes in what he says (according) to the version of Musa) or] has intercourse with his wife (according to the agreed version) when she is menstruating, or has intercourse with his wife through her anus, he has nothing to do with what has been sent down to Muhammad."—Narrated by Abu Hurairah, Book of Divination and Omens, Sunan Abu Dawood, 3895.[6]
"Allah is not shy to tell you the truth: do not have intercourse with your wives in the anus."—Narrated by Imam Ahmad, 5/213
"On the day of resurrection, Allah will not look at a man who had intercourse with his wife in her anus"—Narrated by Ibn Abi Shayba, 3/529; narrated and classed as sahih by Sunan al-Tirmidhi, 1165
"[Make love to your wife] from the front or the back, but avoid the anus and intercourse during menstruation"—Reported by Ahmad and Sunan al-Tirmidhi
"He who has intercourse with his wife through her anus is accursed"—Narrated by Abu Hurairah, Book of Marriage, Sunan Abu Dawood 2157[7]
Thumbs Up |
Received: 92 Given: 0 |
You know what, Each SS Soldier was worth 3 Russians, 2 Americans and 1 Brit alone.
Democracy beat Nazism by outnumbering them, not by being better.
Your Norwegian pussies surrendered to the Germans within 2 months.
Nazi Germany had balls of steel, the likes of which you democratic weaklings cannot even imagine.
And Nazis are not Islamists. At least the real ones, not the fake Neo Nazis we have today.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 433 Given: 0 |
Norway had as much chance at winning against Nazi Germany in conventional warfare as Taliban against the US.
Germany was a large and powerful nation with modern military, Norway was a small and poor nation with no airforce, no tanks and with mostly pre-ww1 ships, artillery and weapons.
Ammunition and supplies was also in short supply which forced some companies to surrender almost right after they had been deployed.
Though the Norwegian army certainly bite off as good as it possible could in some engagements:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Drøbak_Sound
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Hegra_Fortress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alta_Battalion
The Germans gained almost immediate air superiority in Norway(mostly due to a lack of a Norwegian airforce) and conducted bombing raids on 24 towns and villages through out Norway:
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,547 Given: 2,118 |
Why the Holocaust™ is a Fable.__________Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
I retain copyright to all original content I post on The Apricity. Notice posted on June 13, 2020."Unless I am convinced by proofs from Scriptures or by plain and clear reasons and arguments, I can and will not retract, for it is neither safe nor wise to do anything against conscience. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen!" Martin Luther (1483-1547)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,672 Given: 6,343 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks