Beating your woman

[Mary]

Mary is awesome. Exept she is totally of reality, at least of the western world.
Even way back in time in the lawless world men were not the same, some were nice guys some were merciless thugs who got all the hot whores to behave and totally submit
Now days only the true lunatic hardcore committed psychos can achieve what Mary suggests.
Who in the right mind is willing to go through all the trouble anyway.
Now days if you only fight back a bitch she can through you in jail.
I strongly believe there're good soft feminine women out there who need to be treated nice, without the macho crazy beating.
Although feminist movement is ruining most mordern day girls. Sad reality.

Another sad reality, most men are total bitchies. They respect and fall for only women whores who treat them like shit.

Have you ever met one?

[Mary]

A PROFESSOR at Valencia University reportedly said that “abused women shouldn’t leave their husbands because that is love.”

Students at the CEU Cardenal Herrera report that she also said that “abortion following rape is not acceptable because although rape is terrible, something good comes from it, a child, which is a gift from God.”

Gloria Casanova was teaching Social Doctrine in the Church, as part of Journalism studies, and students have published on social networks that she also said that “even if your husband is unfaithful, the true test of love is to continue loving him with tears in your eyes, like Jesus cried on the Cross.” Another comment she reportedly made was “homosexuality can be redirected.”

http://www.euroweeklynews.com/news/s...sity-professor

[Mary]

But how does violence translate into mating opportunities? It
seems that both intrasexual competition and intersexual selection
play an important role, in that intrasexual competition between
men is often directly related to status or reputation, and women
preferentially choose partners of high status, most likely because
high status has historically translated into having access to more
food, better territory, and greater social support, thus serving as an
honest signal of a man’s ability (but not necessarily intent) to
provide for a woman and her offspring (Buss, 2005). Among the
Yanomamö, Chagnon (1988) documented that roughly 40% of the
men had participated in homicide, and these men had higher social
status, as well as more wives, than those who had not participated
in homicide. Nonlethal fights with clubs are also common among
Yanomamö men, and they often take place in the context of
competition over mates (Chagnon, 1992). Although the frequency
of violence among the Yanomamö is higher than that found in
many other tribal societies, the reasoning behind the violence is not
unique. Indeed, many tribal societies bestow increased status and
honor to men who have committed homicide (Daly & Wilson,
1988). This phenomenon can even be found in the United States,
particularly among gangs, in which the most violent gang members
often have the highest status (Campbell, 1993) and the most sexual
partners (Buss, 2011; Ghiglieri, 1999; Palmer & Tilly, 1995).

As mentioned earlier, humans are unique in the animal kingdom in
terms of the substantial investment that men often make in their
offspring. However, until the very recent possibility of DNA
testing, men could never be certain that their putative offspring
were genetically their own. Therefore, the possibility of cuckoldry
(i.e., having an unfaithful partner and subsequently investing in
genetically unrelated offspring) has represented a serious adaptive
problem for men throughout our evolutionary history.
The costs of cuckoldry are severe; not only would a cuckold be
increasing the fitness of a rival by investing in their offspring, but
also the cuckold’s own fitness would suffer as they continue to
spend resources that could be allocated to their genetically related
offspring (if they have any) or to future offspring. Given contem-
porary estimates of worldwide cuckoldry that range from 1–30%
(Goetz, Shackelford, Platek, Starratt, & McKibbin, 2008), it is
likely that cuckoldry occurred often enough throughout our evo-
lutionary history to have imposed strong selection pressures on
men. Therefore, we should expect male psychology to have been
shaped by this adaptive problem, resulting in psychological mech-
anisms for detecting and preventing cuckoldry. And as we have
seen throughout this article, when an adaptive problem carries such
extraordinary costs, violence may emerge as a viable solution.
In order to prevent cuckoldry, men are extremely sensitive to the
possibility of female sexual infidelity, and cues to infidelity serve
as powerful inputs to the psychological mechanisms that evolved
in response to this adaptive problem. In fact, men exhibit an
overperception of partner infidelity, in that they are generally more
likely than women to judge their partners as being unfaithful in the
future (Goetz & Causey, 2009). Since false-positives (perceiving
infidelity when it has not occurred) are less costly to men’s fitness
than false-negatives (not perceiving infidelity when it has oc-
curred), men have evolved mechanisms that generate overpercep-
tions of the possibility of partner infidelity.
Simply perceiving cues to infidelity is not enough to prevent
cuckoldry. Such cues initiate sexual jealousy, which in turn moti-
vates behaviors that function to eliminate the threat of cuckoldry.
Unfortunately, the behaviors that are motivated can often be vio-
lent. Indeed, one of the most frequently cited causes of intimate
partner violence, as well as homicide, is male sexual jealousy
(Goetz, Shackelford, Romero, Kaighobadi, & Miner, 2008), and
men’s partner-directed violence is often predicted by men’s per-
ceived risk of partner infidelity (Kaighobadi & Shackelford, 2009).
Violence can effectively restrict an intimate partner’s behavior,
thus limiting the possibility of infidelity (Goetz, Shackelford,
Romero, et al., 2008).

http://www.toddkshackelford.com/down...d-RGP-2012.pdf

[Baluarte]

Can't say the idea of forbidding her to talk to other men doesn't sound appealing.

[Drawing-slim]

Have you ever met one?

Yes, actually I have. Very sweet girl that would do all the things I tell her and be happy to.
She was Chinese though, and cute.

[Mary]

Yes, actually I have. Very sweet girl that would do all the things I tell her and be happy to.
She was Chinese though, and cute.

Then she's just trying to climb the race ladder. How do you think she behaves towards Chinese men?

[SkyBurn]

Then she's just trying to climb the race ladder. How do you think she behaves towards Chinese men?

Where do you fit on the racial ladder?

[Drawing-slim]

Then she's just trying to climb the race ladder. How do you think she behaves towards Chinese men?

She had only been with one man in he whole life before me. Her husband. age 32. Born and raised in california, very traditional Chinese old roots and I don't see how she is of a lower race since her kids were brilliant in school and master piano and violin players at such early age.
I kinda regret walking way actually.

[Mary]

When a woman choses a man, she does not chose him on how nice of a person he is to be around. If she does, she fails at life. She choses a man based on how she wants her offspring, her future son to be like. Do you think a woman wants her son to be a beta-as-fuck provider that is a bitch, or a tough guy? Which one of those types will in turn have the biggest chance of passing on their genes successfully?

Beta-as-fuck provider,



Tough guy,

[Mary]

She had only been with one man in he whole life before me. Her husband. age 32. Born and raised in california, very traditional Chinese old roots and I don't see how she is of a lower race since her kids were brilliant in school and master piano and violin players at such early age.
I kinda regret walking way actually.

So she left her Chinese husband and then she dated you? And she was also a single mom?