White women and men from Europe a thing of the past?

[Alberta1]

Back on topic:no white people are not going to disappear.

Indeed, and this is the truth. Anyway for me Semitic people are the best

It's their langauges are the most beautiful, the first civilizations and have influenced the world like no other people have. Their mythologies and traditions are just so mesemerizing. Especially Hebrew mythology or ancient Arabian mythology nothing like it's strong charm and it's mystical allure. I believe the Semitic people are great but not at the expense of others. Heck I think they are better than my paternal lineage lol.

[GeistFaust]

But what do you think of what I wrote. An advance civilization might consider some of the stuff we do as barbaric. It might consider the fact that we eat organisms such as mammals (instead of being vegetarians) or that many believe in religion to be ridiculous. Maybe so ridiculous that they might feel it proper to invade us and civilize us to their own standards.

This is by the most ridiculous hypothetical propositions ever thrown out there. I doubt they would be as prediposed to conquering or expressing aggressive behavior towards a society/culture that eats live creatures that are cooked. I doubt they would even see it as inferior behavior, but just a different and exotic practice, which they would prefer not to engage in.


In this case the perceptive is formed on the grounds of cultural preferences, and has nothing to do with being advanced or not. It sometimes includes the concept of one culture being advanced or not, but in this case it comes down to apple and oranges. You are really sounding a liberal hippy with such a proposition like that, and I am not trying to personally attack you, but to show what kind of mentality we are dealing with here.


That is a mentality we can not trust without projecting your rather misaligned concept of racial/cultural advancement, and then claiming that our concepts are flawed. That is when your concepts regarding race/cultural advancements are even less capable of being proved and verified than our own, which you borrow from ironically and hypocritically to formulate and delineate your own anti-racial/advanced cultural view of social realities. I find this is due to many internal consistencies in your thought, and in the manner which you perceive racial and culture as it is.

[2Cool]

It's like you don't even read the replies that people write to you.

I've had this discussion with you before, as have many others on this board. If you want to pretend like you haven't been schooled a dozen times already, then that's fine. Thirteenth time's the charm, but I'll have to be brief:

Sub-Saharan Africa was in a state of utter stagnation prior to the arrival of the Portuguese expeditions in the 15th century. They had never developed the wheel, a system of writing, or anything that could honestly be named a higher culture. More importantly, there were no signs of them doing so before the Big Bad White Man™ arrived on the scene.

Since then, Africans have had ample time to recover from the legacy of slavery, the burden of colonialism, et cetera. You know what the funny thing is? Africans--whether the descendants of those taken in chains to America, immigrants to other Western countries, or those whose ancestors have never left African soil--are the same everywhere insofar as group dynamics are concerned.

Wherever they go, whatever their circumstances, whatever the history informing their cultural perspective, they are demonstrably inferior in intelligence relative to Eurasians.

This cannot be argued. This is empirical fact.

If you have evidence to the contrary, feel free to produce it. Otherwise, I expect you to stop disseminating your misinformation at every opportunity.

Look. I'm non going to argue about this here as I already did. What you said isn't incorrect (they weren't in disarray) but I don't see why it justified the actions of the European towards Africans. I would like for you answered the post that I wrote about the aliens.

[Supreme American]

Nope because I claimed that Ancient Egypt was a mufti ethnic society. I showed you pharaohs that would be considered black today from the beginning of the Ancient Egypt Empire to refute your claim that black Pharaohs only came much later, at the end. In fact, the opposite happened. Towards the end, most pharaohs were Semitic and or white (Greeks, Persians etc). By that point Ancient Egypt was a shadow of its former self.

That the statue of Ramses II indicates that whoever made it never saw the guy to begin with OR intentionally exaggerated his features, so that tells me statues are not necessarily an accurate depiction of actual Pharaohs, so I don't see how anyone can solely rely on a statue.

I wouldn't call it from the very earliest, since nearly all of the statues of those people are missing. Even then there is only one with black features. If you go by statues only - what little they have - I don't see another black-looking ruler until the 18th Dynasty in Amenhotep III. Most of the surviving statues do not have what I would call African features, except maybe Ramses I that looks like an angry gangbanger.

[Alberta1]

North Africa was an extension of Europe, until the evil Semites came and outbred them and made them into Afro-Asiatic mongerls

[brunette]

Dude, the Vandals were awesome.

[Supreme American]

But what do you think of what I wrote. An advance civilization might consider some of the stuff we do as barbaric. It might consider the fact that we eat organisms such as mammals (instead of being vegetarians) or that many believe in religion to be ridiculous. Maybe so ridiculous that they might feel it proper to invade us and civilize us to their own standards.

Oh, I don't care about civilizing anyone. If the blacks and Indians want to cannibalize each other, frankly I don't care. I'm simply saying their contact with the European was a greater benefit for them and that there is no excuse to measure us on a different ruler than others or attack us for influencing them to stop mass murder (sorry veganism can't compare to mass human slaughter). There are tens of millions of people from those races walking this earth that would not be here without white intervention.

Speaking of not giving credit where it's due.

It sounds like you're describing what's already going on which is that we're being browbeaten and reconstructed by the left, which is true. This time it's just soft totalitarianism instead of the in-your-face variety. They certainly have occupied us in the cultural sense.

[Ausência Forçada]

They don't biologically. Socially they do which is what I am using to classify them.

Dont be ridiculous, biologically there are different races and this has been more than proven... anthropological, genetic, cultural differentiation ...

[Supreme American]

Look. I'm non going to argue about this here as I already did. What you said isn't incorrect (they weren't in disarray) but I don't see why it justified the actions of the European towards Africans. I would like for you answered the post that I wrote about the aliens.

The way we left them with electricity and shit is terrible, and how they ended up as slaves instead of dinner and shit.

The waves of guilt rock me as we speak.

[GeistFaust]

It is best that we leave other cultures and civilizations alone. Geistfeist wrote on how east asians wanted to refine their own culture inside their own borders. We need more of that. Us going out into the world and 'spreading our culture' is what brings non-whites to our doorsteps with a hand out.

Its colonalism and advancing our cultures and ideas to other primitive and savage peoples, which might have gotten Europeans in trouble. This outward move was inspired by the desire to universalize universal ideals in the Enlightenment, which inspired a global capitalism and actual political form of world peace. This desire to expand outside the boundaries is sometimes a natural impulse, but if one is not careful it can lead to a great disaster, if it is not done on a level of mutual respect and colloboration.


That is we will not try to Europeanize your culture, which can never be in any sense. If you do Europeanize their culture, mentality, and bloodlines then you are giving them the false notion and concept that they can live within the boundaries of your culture and social systems. Then what you are doing effectively is opening the door to having your culture and people's bloodlines effectively bastardized and mongrelized, which will lead to that which caused you to colonize other peoples in the world.


In the European imagination from the Reformation period to the Modern era there was this conceptual understanding that their would be inevitable race and competition between the other cultures and peoples of the world to universalize their cultures, peoples, and ideals around the world. This was seen as a threat to the European cultures and peoples, and it impulsed them to try to quiet and silence the more savage and primitive elements of the world.


It was an overreaction and a misperception on the part of the Europeans, and it has proved to be fatal in the short and long term for the purity and originality of our peoples and cultures. I think though that in a part it could be justified due to the fact there were other cultures and peoples, who represented concrete threats to the purity and originality of the European cultures and peoples in the past. A lot of these peoples were Arabic-Islamic/Turkic/Mongoloid elements, which might have been a subconscious driving force and motivation of Europeanize the cultures and spirit of the world itself.