What's Your Political Ideology?

[Stefan]

Stefan, USA should at least have a racial identity. As it is right now, USA stands for nothing, no matter which region you take. Only statistically you may extrapolate differences among regions of USA. Intrinsically USA is a melting pot.

Even among whites there is a lot of regional distinctions. A white from Idaho isn't very similar to a white from California, for example. There is a sort of country-folk vs city-folk ideology here in Pennsylvania. I've noticed it among my mom's side of the family. Generally, the cities are multicultural, yes, but outside the cities, the regional identities still persist, which are slowly becoming Americanized by the media.

This is what much of North America is like.



Of course all whites are more similar with each-other than with non-whites, with exceptions.

[Albion]

Yep, NA is surely not something that a nation just decides to convert to, it would require a massive revolution. But like you said it would be exciting to try it in some smaller area, like an island as you suggested. And if it is not possible to convert the majority to NA, you can always gather some friends and retire to the countryside and establish your own NA community

I like the idea of a community of like-minded people buying an old cruise liner or ship of some sort and converting it into a floating village complete with farms.
70% of the world is ocean so the flag nation can only ever nominally control ships at sea and cannot really know what goes on.

I heard that yachts sometimes formed little temporary villages at British Indian Ocean Territory. It seems idyllic, apparently they kept chickens, shared food supplies and one of the people home schooled the kids.

The Americans and British kept moving them on though which was a shame.

Oh, but my ship would have the rule of law though, only it'd be our laws instead. So not anarchist really, more Micronationalist. (read the info in that link - Libertarians keep attempting micronations)

[Breedingvariety]

No, the more aggressive societies would expand at the expense of the others. It is not good at all because brains and brawn rarely go together. Intelligent societies could be wiped out if that happened.

Just look at aggressive societies in the modern world - the Muslim world, Africa. Those are the societies that would be expanding. Then again Europeans could outsmart them to an extent, but it only takes a few smart leaders on their side to overpower and think just as intelligently as more intelligent societies in Europe.

Anarchy would basically be an invitation to them - here, come and invade Europe!

No you are wrong. Sure, some aggressiveness would be needed and strong vitality of a tribal race would be needed. But when all that is present, Europeans would easily ruin any competition.

The weakness of European folk is not intrinsic in their nature. The weakness is conditioned by pressures to be the best dumb slaves to the ruling elites. Europeans can not roam free and they are loosing to the dumbest of them.

Muslim aggression towards Europeans can only go so far as Europeans are subjugated and pussyfied by the ruling elites. As soon as the oppression would end, all aliens would be kicked out with ease.

When push comes to shove, Europeans are still at the top.

[Albion]

No you are wrong. Sure, some aggressiveness would be needed and strong vitality of a tribal race would be needed. But when all that is present, Europeans would easily ruin any competition.

The weakness of European folk is not intrinsic in their nature. The weakness is conditioned by pressures to be the best dumb slaves to the ruling elites. Europeans can not roam free and they are loosing to the dumbest of them.

Muslim aggression towards Europeans can only go so far as Europeans are subjugated and pussyfied by the ruling elites. As soon as the oppression would end, all aliens would be kicked out with ease.

When push comes to shove, Europeans are still at the top.

I suppose our pacifist leaders would be out of the way and the warriors amongst us would emerge. Yeah, I suppose you're right.

[Barbarossa]

I chose fascism, however for me fascism will be only the way to establish good society and not final form of it. I woud say that most fascinating movements in 20th century for me were Dolfuss and Austrofascism, Horty's Hungary, Franco's Spain and Falange, Iron Guard etc. On the ideological level I respect Spengler, Junger, Evola, De Mastre, Donoso Cortes and simmilar thinkers.

[Kemalisté]

State socialism combined with Maoism and Kemalism.

[Partizan]

Third Worldist Socialist with Nationalist leanings...

Similar to Atatürk,Galiyev,Nasser,Chavez and Tito.

[Wonder]

None.

"By definition, "ideology" means servitude to political dogmas, abstract ideas not founded upon historical experience. Ideology is inverted religion, and the ideologue is the sort of person whom the historian Jacob Burckhardt called the "terrible simplifier." - Russell Kirk

I have a Taoist approach to politics:

"Stop trying to control.
Let go of fixed plans and concepts,
and the world will govern itself."
- Tao Te Ching, Chapter 57, trans. Stephen Mitchell

[Just90]

Republican

[Nameless Son]

Republican

whats wrong with free health care?