Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Chronicle of the Early Britons

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    .
    Ethnicity
    .
    Taxonomy
    .
    Gender
    Posts
    9,771
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 85
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Chronicle of the Early Britons

    Chronicle of the early Britons

    The early history of Britain is usually presented in schools in nondescript terms such as stone age, bronze age and iron age. It fails to identify any real people, until the arrival of Julius Caesar in 55bc. Yet there is more than a thousand years of documented British history that pre-dates the arrival of the Romans. This history is given in a welsh document, described by bill cooper in the first paragraph of his introduction is as follows:
    there lies in an Oxford library a certain old and jaded manuscript. It is written in medieval Welsh in an informal cursive hand, and is a 15th-century copy of a 12th-century original (now lost). Its shelfmark today is Jesus college ms lxi, but that has not always been its name. For some considerable time it went under the far more evocative name of the tysilio chronicle, and earlier this century a certain archaeologist made the following observation concerning it. The year was 1917, the archaeologist was flinders petrie, and his observation was that this manuscript was being unaccountably neglected by the scholars of his day. It was, he pointed out, perhaps the best representative of an entire group of chronicles in which are preserved certain important aspects of early British history, aspects that were not finding their way into the published notices of those whose disciplines embraced this period.
    the first English translation was by peter Roberts in 1811, and a second edition was published in 1862, but in 1917 it had become so rare that flinders petrie (1) was unable to obtain a copy, and had to get one of the British museum copies type-written so that he could do his research. Things are rather better now, because a facsimile reprint of the 1811 edition is available (2). We would be impoverished if the work of peter Roberts was the only existing translation of this important history. There should always be more than one scholar looking at the same manuscripts, and giving us their comments on the text.

    Bill cooper's version comes with 574 footnotes of linguistic, historical and geographical interest, and has been scrutinized for accuracy by Ellis Evans, professor of Celtic studies at Jesus college. However, every attempt to publish it has failed, because it was sent out to modernist reviewers who advised against publication. Now, at last, it is allowed to see the light of day, thanks to modern technology, so that readers can make up their own minds and decide for themselves whether or not this is a true account of the British history.[/quote]


    Attachment 1941
    Last edited by Beorn; 09-19-2009 at 01:28 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Somewhere in the North Atlantic
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic
    Ethnicity
    Welsh
    Region
    Pembrokeshire
    Politics
    Huh?
    Gender
    Posts
    7,787
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 100
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Thanks for posting this, Wat!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •