
Fernando Pessoa
"O mar com fim será grego ou romano: O mar sem fim é português."


I voted yes, as long as the the wife has a veto on it.
Some people have stranger lifestyles and it makes no problems, so I don't see the harm here.


The probability of getting a boy is higher by 2% or so. The number of men is lower due to other factors (more men dying). Curiosity; men are also much more susceptible to genetic mutations due to having only one X chromosome. Men are the genetic playground for mutations.



Yes better than legalizing homosexuality.
McDonald results: 50% Adyghei 50% Bedouin
Proud Kavkazian and Southern Semite



In a Patriarchal society I would vote no, being we live in a soft matriarchy of a civilisation I vote, Yes.![]()

Polygamy is a great solution for the mudsharking whores.
And Polyandry for the Asian-lovers.
Death smiles at us all, All a man can do, is Smile Back



Because a large (and inevitably, expanding) population of sexually deprived single men is a recipie for mass violence and social instability. The Islamic world is proof enough, and China will soon discover this. Better that inter-sexual bonding for the purpose of reproduction occur within a monogamous relationship. There are cases when individual opinion should have no bearing on social conduct - this is one of them.




I still say no. I can't imagine the results would be beneficial overall for society.

No, this will lead to men wanting too many women and would start taking cousins.

First the number of homos should be counted, in both men and women.
Then, if Gays exceed Lesbians, than it can be legalized.
Death smiles at us all, All a man can do, is Smile Back
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks