Afrocentrism

[The Lawspeaker]

you...BASTARD!

i hate you

Eh.. what, mate ?

[MarkyMark]

LOL there is more E1b1b* subclades in West Asia and even Europe as in West/Southwest Africa.

It has a clear Caucasoid distribution.

Is that white area in North Iraq supposed to be the Assyrian population? I would think so. Assyrians usually don't mix with others.

[Demhat]

Is that white area in North Iraq supposed to be the Assyrian population? I would think so. Assyrians usually don't mix with others.

Nope The Kurds are the large majority in North Iraq. So why should they base North Iraq on Assyrian individuals?

However Assyrians being a semitic group have high frequency of E1b1b* while Kurds have very low (tending from 5-10%). So its based on the Kurdish population.

[Solin]

First Berbers are largely Semites, as they claim themselves they have origins in Yemen. That doesn't mean they are 100% Semites (like Europeans are far from being 100% aryan), but there were waves of Semitic people who conquered North Africa in pre-islamic times and the berber traditions confirm this.

Second, like I mentioned before Egypt drew large numbers of immigrants from other parts of the world and it could be easily said this Pharoah with the red hair was not of local origin, like e.g rulers of Italy were not of local blood, but of German blood.

About genetics, give me a favor man, it doesn't say anything. Hausa negroes are R1b does it say anything? Or that Uzbeks are R1a, does it say they are related to Slavic Russians?

I can't count on what scientist say, they sometimes say accurate things but there's a long way before you can take what they say for granted.

btw Egyptians only depicted Nubians (Sudan) and not Ethiopians, so you can't say they depicted themselves as different from the Ethiopid type.

Egyptians were of Hamitic stock and not related in any connections in their original form to semitic people.

Tut belonged to R1b1a2 type to which 50% of Europeans belong.
It is a particulary European type.

[MarkyMark]

Nope The Kurds are the large majority in North Iraq. So why should they base North Iraq on Assyrian individuals?

However Assyrians being a semitic group have high frequency of E1b1b* while Kurds have very low (tending from 5-10%). So its based on the Kurdish population.

Must be your Indo-Iranian roots. However can I see some sort of chart or evidence that shows Assyrians have a high E1b1b? I would've guessed them to be J2 and R1b mostly.

[Demhat]

Must be your Indo-Iranian roots. However can I see some sort of chart or evidence that shows Assyrians have a high E1b1b? I would've guessed them to be J2 and R1b mostly.

I cant find any data but If I remember right I saw some statistic showing 18 or 8% E1b1b. Cant remember very well.

[only1]

Medieval? Romans told of how they encountered Berbers in Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia long before then.

Besides, I have a suspicion that you're confusing them with BEDOUINS who actually did come from Arabia and migrated latter into Africa.

Migrations from Yemen took place in pre-Islamic times. Could be hundreds of years before Rome was even built.

[1810-2010]

Let's be honest about it. That African hut (is that really the best they can do ?) is a joke for me as an architecture lover. Is that really the best you can do ? If so: I feel sorry for you lot.

True: architecture in the tropics does not have to be as complicated as the architecture of a people that is living out in the temperate regions like we Europeans or the Chinese but you can do better than that:







This is what the Spanish saw when marching into Tenoctitlan and crushing the Aztecs.

Or Angkor Wat in Cambodia:

[YOUTUBE]A8d_MsLNz4M[/YOUTUBE]

Well do not worry as Afrocentrists has already found the way to claim that Meso American native cultures were created by black sailors who broguht civilisations to those poor American natives and worst of all, the originator of this BS, Van Sertina or something likethat achived to get his book published by... the SMITHSONIAN