The Ottoman Empire vs The British Empire

[Ánleifr]

Who would win?

[Methmatician]

British, of course.

[StonyArabia]

British, of course.

With bribed people on their side. The British would have never won if they did not create the Arab revolt. The Arab revolt was an internal one. When the Ottomans were in their height, and when there was unity based on faith, the British would have never come out as winners, they might have left some damage but not as winners. Russia also only began to attack the Ottomans in their decline, but even the Ottomans inflected heavy damage upon them. Only Britain was successful because of the use of the Arab revolt. Although not all tribes joined the Arab revolt.The Arab revolt was an internal one. Britain also became more powerful because of it's global empire that enslaved and robbed others of their wealth. They were also helped by the powerful Rothschild dynasty. When the Ottomans were in their height, and when there was unity based on faith, the British would have never come out as winners, they might have left some damage but not as winners.

Even Austria-Hungary could never humiliate the Ottoman empire. The only reason that they gained some advantage was because of the Persian invasions on the Ottoman empire, and this was the beginning of the decline. By the time Britain began to expand into the Middle East, the Ottomans were in state of decline, and there was a rise of nationalism among the various ethnic groups like Arab nationalism which the British funded much like the Wahabi movement.

[Methmatician]

With bribed people on their side. The British would have never won if they did not create the Arab revolt. The Arab revolt was an internal one. Britain also became more powerful because of it's global empire that enslaved and robbed others of their wealth. They were also helped by the powerful Rothschild dynasty. When the Ottomans were in their height, and when there was unity based on faith, the British would have never come out as winners, they might have left some damage but not as winners.

Hence why they would win.

[Ánleifr]

What is the Rothschild dynasty?

[Insuperable]

Quite obvious answer, the British

[StonyArabia]

What is the Rothschild dynasty?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family.

[Siberian Cold Breeze]

Which century?

[ficuscarica]

First Ottomans, later British... depending on the time.

[Osprey]

With bribed people on their side. The British would have never won if they did not create the Arab revolt. The Arab revolt was an internal one. When the Ottomans were in their height, and when there was unity based on faith, the British would have never come out as winners, they might have left some damage but not as winners. Russia also only began to attack the Ottomans in their decline, but even the Ottomans inflected heavy damage upon them. Only Britain was successful because of the use of the Arab revolt. Although not all tribes joined the Arab revolt.The Arab revolt was an internal one. Britain also became more powerful because of it's global empire that enslaved and robbed others of their wealth. They were also helped by the powerful Rothschild dynasty. When the Ottomans were in their height, and when there was unity based on faith, the British would have never come out as winners, they might have left some damage but not as winners.

Even Austria-Hungary could never humiliate the Ottoman empire. The only reason that they gained some advantage was because of the Persian invasions on the Ottoman empire, and this was the beginning of the decline. By the time Britain began to expand into the Middle East, the Ottomans were in state of decline, and there was a rise of nationalism among the various ethnic groups like Arab nationalism which the British funded much like the Wahabi movement.

British were renowned strategists, tacticians and master manipulators. Along with the Redcoats, the best standard infantry and the Royal Navy, they would royall fuck the Ottomans up, in any time, any place or any way.