0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,716 Given: 1,188 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,302 Given: 4,653 |
when in doubt, East Med.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,377 Given: 5,220 |
real life Atlanto-Med. Could be Mong shifted too.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,716 Given: 1,188 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,377 Given: 5,220 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 24,182 Given: 16,899 |
Looks Greek to me to be honest. I mean, maybe he has some Asian phenotype, but maybe also he was just born with more narrow eyes. It can happen, it is not like every single person with the same phenotype is a photocopy of each other.
YDNA: R1b-L21 > DF13 > S1051 > FGC17906 > FGC17907 > FGC17866
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,716 Given: 1,188 |
Technically maybe not, but I'm talking about a distinction between a more archaic stabilized influence compared to, for example, a woggy, slant-eyed Turk, if that makes any sense.
I also read recently that whatever HG influence Balkan farmers had was related not to WGH but to SHG/EHG who we already know were mong-shifted compared to the former.
https://ep70.eventpilot.us/web/page....6&id=160122024
We generated new genome-wide ancient DNA data from 65 farmers from the Balkans and adjacent regions dating as far back as 6,400 BCE. We document how the dynamics of admixture between the regions first farmers and its indigenous hunter-gatherers was complex, with evidence of local admixture from hunter-gatherers related to those from Scandinavia and Eastern Europe. The population admixture was patchy across both space and time, varying in magnitude between 0% and 30% for different early Balkan farming populations. The hunter-gatherer admixture in the early farmers of the Balkans is not closely related to the hunter-gatherer admixture that is predominant in present-day Europeans. This suggests that the waves of farmers that contributed most of the migrants to northern and western Europe were not ones that mixed substantially with local Balkan hunter-gatherers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks