Are Turks White?

[ChildOfTheJin]

The Mongols were savages, if it was not for Ibn Al-qami betrayal they would have been crushed the Persian vizer of the Caliph . The Mongols were proven to be nothing once they got crushed by the the Mumlukes, descendants of Circassian warriors. These Circassians humiliated the Mongol forces at Ayin Jalut. And everything that belonged to them, came back to the Mamlukes.

The Mongols and Turks had nothing. Their empire was controlled usually by Caucasians. Even the Crimean Tatars khans often made their Circassian consorts admin the empire because they were illterate

Thanks for kicking their asses

[alanr]

The Mongols were savages, if it was not for Ibn Al-qami betrayal they would have been crushed the Persian vizer of the Caliph . The Mongols were proven to be nothing once they got crushed by the the Mumlukes, descendants of Circassian warriors. These Circassians humiliated the Mongol forces at Ayin Jalut. And everything that belonged to them, came back to the Mamlukes.

The Mongols and Turks had nothing. Their empire was controlled usually by Caucasians. Even the Crimean Tatars khans often made their Circassian consorts admin the empire because they were illterate

As I stated several times, the savages were lucky that the Middle East was divided and betrayed by that fool.

[alanr]

And I really don't care if you care or not, though clearly you must care enough to post on something that is irrelevant to you.

[SKYNET]

hey people, what's going on in here? Kurds, turks, mongols lol



there is one continent where live a white people with an other views.

[Kemalisté]

The Mongol Nomads knew that Arabo-Persian civilization was superior to theirs and hence why they adopted it.

Indeed. Here is a comparison of Arab and Mongolian civilizations:




I'm not really sad because Mongolians kicked some uncivilized umayyad ass and put them in their place after converting many civilizations by sword.

[Anatolian Eagle]

Everything is Circassian and Arab, Circassia Circassia über alles

Fixed. Why bother with TL;DR when your words could be shortened to this?

[StonyArabia]

As I stated several times, the savages were lucky that the Middle East was divided and betrayed by that fool.

Indeed, the Mongols were only lucky. If there was not betrayal, there was no division, they would not have made it all the way into the borders of Egypt. However they might have inflicted heavy damage. History would have certainly began to look different if the Mongols never razed the Middle East to the ground. The greatest city and the most enlightened and referred to a the Jewel of the World Baghdad was now in ruins, due to these marauding savages. However luck again has struck with the Mamlukes and the Middle East this time. Most historian and archeologists say the Mongols were primitive to do the damage they have done if it was not for Ibn Al-aqami secret alliance, since he wanted to gain power for him.

There is a saying where after he was successfully brought destruction to his own lands. Helegue Khan says to him You have betrayed your people and nation, how do I know you won't betray me. Then he cut his head and paraded through Baghdad on his stake.

[Hayalet]

The Mongols were savages, if it was not for Ibn Al-qami betrayal they would have been crushed the Persian vizer of the Caliph . The Mongols were proven to be nothing once they got crushed by the the Mumlukes, descendants of Circassian warriors. These Circassians humiliated the Mongol forces at Ayin Jalut. And everything that belonged to them, came back to the Mamlukes.

The Mongols and Turks had nothing. Their empire was controlled usually by Caucasians. Even the Crimean Tatars khans often made their Circassian consorts admin the empire because they were illterate

This post wouldn't have been as loserishly lame if it did not come from a person who discovered his make-believe "Circassian heritage" about a year ago and was claiming to be Crimean Tatar, among other things, earlier. :icon_cheesygrin:

[StonyArabia]

This post wouldn't have been as loserishly lame if it did not come from a person who discovered his make-believe "Circassian heritage" about a year ago and was claiming to be Crimean Tatar, among other things, earlier. :icon_cheesygrin:

Well Circassians and Crimean Tatars are related. You know that many of their consorts were Circassians. They liked green eyes and light brown haired girls over Turkic ones

We just need to bring back the Karachay and Balkars to the Circassian fold again.

[Su]

Well Circassians and Crimean Tatars are related. You know that many of their consorts were Circassians. They liked green eyes and light brown haired girls over Turkic ones

We just need to bring back the Karachay and Balkars to the Circassian fold again.

But ethnic Circassians are usually neither blond nor light eyed they are rather dark pigmented with rather Asiatic eyes.