0
No...a thousand times no. It's never been anything to do with black people.
Early settlers to US had around 80% light eyes (as of 1800), the didn't have same characteristics as modern UK or even UK of its day. Until 1900s when they started letting southern italians and such in, it had much higher % of light eyes than UK.
Later waves of settlers had more black hair, which was relatively uncommon until then, especially in Irish Americans.
That's it, done finito. Topic never needs to be discussed again.
But it's not homogenous, and early irish settlers had more light eyes and more light hair. They are not the same as settlers than came earlier and came from other areas, which were not so mixed up then. Isles also did NOT have the same demographic as when the first Irish came over.In the past Ireland was ruled by Chieftains and clan groups. The Irish have always had a variety of hair colours and there is no isolated group in Ireland displaying dark hair and eyes.
Once again, this means nothing. Especially not when talking about population that's completely and utterly different than when the first Melonheads left for America. People in Ireland who don't have giant heads and stubby legs, came later.All the Irish cluster together.
But they didn't pull people out of random areas, and England has changed an awful lot since the early settler days. Like I said USA had 80% light eyes. That's higher than any country that exists today, and certainly higher than England was at the time. Black hair was also not common. That's why the term Black Irish exists. The Irish who mixed to blacks, are just called black today. It takes 100+ years to have any chance of an ancestor of a pure black being able to pass. All of this is just nonsense, and barely any passable whites in america are mixed to blacks - most of them because they mixed with jews or hispanics who already had a small amount.It's not like Britain doesn't have its share of dark haired people or any other country. It's most probably similar to "Black Dutch".
Bookmarks