Who was Attila and the Huns?

[Vesuvian Sky]

Huns were a hybrid of Mongoloid and Caucasoid, majority was closer to Caucasoid while minority closer to Mongoloid. Here are facial reconstruction of Huns by Russian themselves.
A Hun from Kyrgyzstan, nose is mongoloid influence while the eyes are are slightly influenced by Mongoloid.

How many of these are "Xiongnu"/"Hunnu" vs. actual "Hun" period?

The Kyrgystan bust is particularly interesting. Is this Xiongnu period rather?

[ButlerKing]

How many of these are "Xiongnu"/"Hunnu" vs. actual "Hun" period?

The Kyrgystan bust is particularly interesting. Is this Xiongnu period rather?

None of them are Xiongnu, the Huns from Mongolia are predominately mongoloid compared with the predominately Caucasoid Huns in Kyrgyzstan.

Example of Xiongnu

[Dacul]

Uralic component of the Conquest era Hungarians???

Oh really?
And where are the east asian lines?
You did not even looked on R1A1 lines from that table,are all european lines,not asian lines.
You pan-turanists are just a buch of uneducated fanatics,who are dealing with this problem like an enraged bull deals when he sees red in front of his eyes,lol.
So there are no Y DNA paternal lines from East Asia (Q HG is not really asian,could be also from siberian people) ,no autosomal DNA from East Asia,you do not have an east asian language,but you insist that you are "turanids" and that Atilla was turkic.
Lol!

[Hoca]

Who cares that they were Caucasoid or Mongoloid. Some guys sound like a fucking eugenistic spokeman of hitler. It doesn't matter what the mixture was. It is clear who he was.

[Vesuvian Sky]

None of them are Xiongnu, the Huns from Mongolia are predominately mongoloid compared with the predominately Caucasoid Huns in Kyrgyzstan.

Example of Xiongnu

So if Xiongu=Hunnu=Hun then this guy theoretically shows us what someone ancestral to a Hun looked like at one point in time, that is if onece excepts "Hunnu=Huns theory". However, accordng to some maps "Hunnic" empire (Attila's time) does not encompass any of present day Kyrgystan. So in what temporal context is that one Kyrgyz Hun bust being considered as "Hun"?

[Szegedist]

Oh really?
And where are the east asian lines?
You did not even looked on R1A1 lines from that table,are all european lines,not asian lines.
You pan-turanists are just a buch of uneducated fanatics,who are dealing with this problem like an enraged bull deals when he sees red in front of his eyes,lol.
So there are no Y DNA paternal lines from East Asia (Q HG is not really asian,could be also from siberian people) ,no autosomal DNA from East Asia,you do not have an east asian language,but you insist that you are "turanids" and that Atilla was turkic.
Lol!

I am uneducated? You are the one trolling with there is a finnish village called Attila, therefore Attila was a Finn. But revisionism is something very typical for Romanians.

The Huns were Central Asian, not East Asian (Chinese).

[Szegedist]

The Huns were most likely a mixture of Siberians, proto Turkics and the Iranic(Scythian) groups of Central Asia, who later absorbed Slavs and Germanics into their empire.

[Dacul]

Who cares that they were Caucasoid or Mongoloid. Some guys sound like a fucking eugenistic spokeman of hitler. It doesn't matter what the mixture was. It is clear who he was.

Oh really?
It is clear that he was not turkic,that is very clear.
Caucasian people and fino-ugrian languages?

Look where fino-ugrian languages are spoken:

Do you see anyone in East Asia or in Caucasus speaking fenno-ugrian languages?
Are you people who are sustaining that Atilla was from East Asia and mongoloid really lacked of any common sense?

[Szegedist]

Who cares that they were Caucasoid or Mongoloid. Some guys sound like a fucking eugenistic spokeman of hitler. It doesn't matter what the mixture was. It is clear who he was.

Next they will say he was a Jew

[Szegedist]

Oh really?
It is clear that he was not turkic,that is very clear.
Caucasian people and fino-ugrian languages?

Look where fino-ugrian languages are spoken:

Do you see anyone in East Asia or in Caucasus speaking fenno-ugrian languages?
Are you people who are sustaining that Atilla was from East Asia and mongoloid really lacked of any common sense?

Wow, you do realize that the composition of Asia, and the languages spoken there is a lot different now than it was 1500 years ago?