Preservationism vs Racialism

[Supreme American]

Hit the nail on the head.

The first and foremost duty of everyone should be to try live the golden rule. We do that, and many things will fall into place. Will we ever achieve that ideal? Probably not, but for me, it's the most important thing we can do to improving the world.

Cultures are not dead things, they are ever-changing, and should be ever-changing and able to learn from their mistakes. What we should hold onto are the values of generosity, honesty, and upholding human life and dignity. When it comes to indvidual customs, I think that many should be preserved. It's a terrible shame when dominant cultures completely swamp smaller cultures. That being said, protecting those customs should always be secondary to the values that I mentioned above.

Depends on how you define the golden rule. It also doesn't always apply on a planet of limited resources of limited global location, either.

[Supreme American]

That's because the concept of superority and inferiority are rather relative and depends on the circumistances. Civilizations have risen and fallen and this rather a universal theme. There are individuals who do believe they are inferior, but certainly not on a collective level, and this because of self-hate and which often have complex origins.

Yet in spite of that it has been shown that IQ is heavily genetic and that even in biological twins raised by different adoptive families, the IQs of the siblings remain very close to each other throughout their lives.

The environment-only theory has long been debunked.

[2Cool]

Yet in spite of that it has been shown that IQ is heavily genetic and that even in biological twins raised by different adoptive families, the IQs of the siblings remain very close to each other throughout their lives.

The environment-only theory has long been debunked.

Can you post a link to that study?

[Supreme American]

Can you post a link to that study?

Two points:

1) I and others have posted IQ heritability links to you previously which you ignored, and

2) I got it from a developmental psychology textbook from a class I took just over a year ago. But if you're curious (not that you'll change your mind) It's in this book, you can scroll down to page 18 and read the text.

[Prince Carlo]

I don't believe in racial superiority of certain races over others. I will leave that stuff to retard nutzis.

[JamesSteal]

I believe in racial superiority over certain races, especially ones that wear lip plates, bathe in cow urine, have no technological achievements, constantly ask for handouts, reek of an odor and constantly necklace each other.

[StonyArabia]

More mixed people, even in general, still means a mixed category comes to be enlarged, which is beneficial to you personally as mixed race people are a distinct category in population statistics.

That indeed could be true, but this is only to a certain extent. However if it happens it happens if it does not, it has no effect at all.

I'm unsure why you continue to insist you only favor mixed unions because people have some nebulous right to 'choose their partners'. You've stated repeatedly that you oppose gay marriage, among similar unions, so that explanation doesn't wash.

This might sound strange to racialists who often tend to be hypocrites you even agreed with me on this, but mixed race unions have always have happened and it's probably as ancient as humanity itself. In fact they occurred due to formation of political alliances or simply there was not much women, and in very rare cases it even occurred with men. However homosexuality was always seen to be something in all socities to be wrong and immoral, this because it does not have a have a natural tendencies. Interracial romances have occurred in almost all socities and they are rarely rejected especially if it's the dominant men who are taking women from the subdued population. In other cases there is indeed interracial romances in every situation where two different people are present. One of them even became an important American legend, Pocahontas, and in Mexico La Malinche who is the wife of Hernan Cortes who bore him the first Mestizo. There are many stories that are of this nature in many areas that have striking similarities, the most recent is that of Iraq.


However although there is a political nature to such marriage but they are also truly built genuine relationship love and that's what is important. The only criticism is often targeted at women rather than men, however you can't eat your cake and have it too. Thus the situation between heterosexuality that might be deemed as interracial is rather natural at the end unlike homosexuality and hence there is no similiarties between them if any at all. If two consenting adults who really want to be with one another and is based on mutal understanding friendship and built on genuine love, then I see nothing wrong with it and people should mind their own business plain and simple.

La Malinche


free picture hosting

Just one example.

However such stories repeat themselves