0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 100 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
How Celtic are you?
Basically most of Western and Central Europe could call themselves Celtic if they base it on ancient history, it looses it's appeal when it becomes synonymous with 'Generic European'.
Ireland to Turkey, Scotland to Portugal, it's quite a large area.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5 Given: 1 |
Well, no.
This crap of "from Ireland to Turkey" should stop. A thing is the sporadical presence of Celts on a given territory ; another one is a process ofdemographic colonization.
These days (as never happened even in the recent past), the personal genomics gives us the possibility to know with reasonable approximation our biological roots, so , at a reasonable extent, we can know (%) how celtic are we.
If we define "celtic" as populations with high amonut of a determinate component (peaks in Ireland Cornwall, etc.) then TURKEY isn't celtic at all.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 18 Given: 0 |
It's a form of art. How come Inverness is your home? I thought that you said you didn't know where in Scotland your ancestors were from and then later after said that they were from Argyll (your name). I've never heard you mention anything about Inverness until I told you that I was going there in a week in the chat box not too long ago . Did my telling you this help you discover your true home and ancestral origins? Hope so
I see that you are also not "pure celtic" any longer and you have made the discovery of being "very slight germanic" as well .
Last edited by Boudica; 10-07-2011 at 09:18 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
Yes.Well, no.
And most people use the very daft approach of equating R1b with Celts when R1b is common as muck across a huge area.This crap of "from Ireland to Turkey" should stop. A thing is the sporadical presence of Celts on a given territory ; another one is a process ofdemographic colonization.
These days (as never happened even in the recent past), the personal genomics gives us the possibility to know with reasonable approximation our biological roots, so , at a reasonable extent, we can know (%) how celtic are we.
The subclades don't come into it for most people, but on saying that it is extremely doubtful that ancient Celts would have just belonged to a few types, rather many subclades of various haplogroups.
So what exactly is this "Celtic gene" you are hinting at? The one which enables us to see the difference between say the Irish and the Normans?
Celtic can't be based on genetics which is the point I was hinting at, it's culture-only.If we define "celtic" as populations with high amonut of a determinate component (peaks in Ireland Cornwall, etc.) then TURKEY isn't celtic at all.
Galatia was a Celtic region... once. Some claim they spoke Celtic until the 1500s, a similar time to when Scotland reached it's peak with the annexing of the Northern Isles.
No part of Turkey is Celtic, but if we base being Celtic on Celts having lived in a place in the past as many people appear to be doing, then we find it becomes quite ridiculous.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
'How Celtic are you?' is like asking a chicken if it's a duck. It can't tell you and wouldn't know anyway.
That best describes many people who describe themselves as Celtic, Germanic or whatever.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks