0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
It's laughable to see the extent to which people will deny the evidence of genetics, history, anthropology, linguistics, and culture to reassure themselves that Finns are European. Failing that, some people conveniently 'forget' their politics and say embarrassing things like "Who cares if they're 39% Mongoloid!!??? What does it matt0r!?"
Whether you want Finns to be significantly Asiatic is irrelevant to whether they actually ARE Asiatic. And if you support unions (and naturally interbreeding) with Asiatics, as many in this thread do, then good for you. But please don't make any contrary statements in any other threads. I do dislike hypocrisy.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
Well, that would of course depend on your values and concerns. To a Christian it wouldn't matter; we're all people. To a liberal, it wouldn't matter; all genes are equal. To me it matters, because I dislike race mixing. To Swedes and Norwegians it matters, because Finns and related populations are responsible for injecting an Asiatic strain into their population. To science, it matters, because science strives to establish truth. I doubt Newton received the same defensive "WhAT R DuZ it maTt0r!!!" reaction from his peers. Scientific inquiry shouldn't be restrained by petty emotionalism.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21 Given: 0 |
There are enough "evidence of genetics, history, anthropology, linguistics, and culture" that confirms what everyone with eyes and a functioning brain clearly can see:
Finns are white, caucasoid and non asiatic Europeans just like all other Europeans.
To say the contrary is to mock intelligence.
If you have any evidence whatsoever to prove your ridiculous claim about Finns bring them on.
What are you talking about ? Born after Tchernobyl or something?Failing that, some people conveniently 'forget' their politics and say embarrassing things like "Who cares if they're 39% Mongoloid!!??? What does it matt0r!?"
Hipocrisy is the fact that there are some 20 million people in Russia who carry N1c... What makes them "more European" and "less Asiatic" than Finns..? LOL!Whether you want Finns to be significantly Asiatic is irrelevant to whether they actually ARE Asiatic. And if you support unions (and naturally interbreeding) with Asiatics, as many in this thread do, then good for you. But please don't make any contrary statements in any other threads. I do dislike hypocrisy.
Clearly you don't like Finnish people and it is fine with me another fact is that U R Face is a troll account: Purpose to support Hors (maybe it is Hors?) and his inferiority complex. The worlds largest socioeconomic gap is between Finland and Russia. There are only two people who have killed as many Russians as the Finns have, Germans (WWII) and ..yes.. that's right... Russians themselves.
I guess it hurts. It hurts so much Hors who have to resort to 19th century "science" like Gobineau; the mad frenchman.
Moderator!!!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6 Given: 0 |
There is some emotionalism in your concern with "race mixing", however.
And what is race? To the best of my knowledge, it's usually associated with overt phenotypic characteristics, not with such abstractions like statistics of the distribution of certain haplogroups in the population. This obsession with genetics is much more irrelevant than the old style racialism, which was concerned with skin colour, skull shape and similar. Because this older racialism has at least some basis in the visual experience. Whereas this new genetic craze is totally abstract and meaningless.
"Scientific truth"? Regarding this, I rather stand with Feyerabend who says that scientific truth(s), allegedly established by scientists, shouldn't be arbiters in social matters, that is, if some scientific view conflicts with the common sense, then priority should be geiven to the latter. And modern science hasn't even pretence to discover some definite truths, but just "highly (or less) probable hypotheses".
And btw: if these genetic findings were to be taken really seriously, even on the supposition that something like haplogroup distribution really mattered for the national identity (and I don't think it does), research should be made on all Finns, not on some small sample.
Last edited by Poltergeist; 09-21-2009 at 12:02 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21 Given: 0 |
For once I had to admit to being wrong...
I said there were 20 million Russians that carry N1c. I was maybe thinking that there are estimates that around 25-30 million Russians are descendants of various Finno Ugrian peoples. Most of them in north Russia, so I guess that out of 115 million Russians some 25-30 million are ok and actually do work hard, have some sort of morale and pride...
What does Uke boy and Hors dig this?
More than in Finland. Don't throw stones in glasshouse...Russians:
total population: approx. 115,889,107 in Russia (Russian Census of 2002)
approx. 145,031,551 worldwide (Ethnologue 2005)
approx. 137,000,000 worldwide (Wikipedia article on "Russians")
N1c frequency: 161/1119 = 14.39% (total of all Russian Y-DNA data from Rosser et al. 2000, Wells et al. 2001, Derenko et al. 2007, Karafet et al. 2002, and Central Russian Y-DNA data from Balanovsky et al. 2008)
total N1c individuals: approx. 8,336,973 in Russia
approx. 10,433,458 worldwide (following Ethnologue 2005 estimate)
approx. 9,855,675 worldwide (following Wikipedia estimate)
Ukrainians:
total population: approx. 39,441,842 (Ethnologue 2005 total for all countries)
N1c frequency: 19/224 = 8.48% (total of all Ukrainian data from Rosser et al. 2000, Semino et al. 2000, Varzari 2006, and Kharkov et al. 2004)
total N1c individuals: approx. 1,672,757
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
The East Baltid type, which by definition is partially Uralid, is among the most frequently encountered types in NE Europe, particularly Finland. The distribution of the E. Baltid type correlates significantly with Tat-C, a (fairly recent) Siberian marker.
What was ridiculous? That Finns have Asiatic ancestry? That they've had extensive historical interaction with Uralics? That they speak a Uralic language? That Uralic types are common in Finland? I don't believe a single one of those claims is controversial. Even the guy in the OP admits that 1/3 of Finnish genes are 'from the East'.If you have any evidence whatsoever to prove your ridiculous claim about Finns bring them on.
No, Tchernobyl was born in my face and came out of my ears.What are you talking about ? Born after Tchernobyl or something?
I don't think I did say that.Hipocrisy is the fact that there are some 20 million people in Russia who carry N1c... What makes them "more European" and "less Asiatic" than Finns..? LOL!
I don't have a problem with Finns. I do have a problem with irrationality. I've seen this topic quite often, and the outcome is always the same. People simply can't digest the truth when it crosses a certain boundary. I'm just helping them come to terms with reality.Clearly you don't like Finnish people and it is fine with me another fact is that U R Face is a troll account: Purpose to support Hors (maybe it is Hors?) and his inferiority complex. The worlds largest socioeconomic gap is between Finland and Russia. There are only two people who have killed as many Russians as the Finns have, Germans (WWII) and ..yes.. that's right... Russians themselves.
I guess it hurts. It hurts so much Hors who have to resort to 19th century "science" like Gobineau; the mad frenchman.
Moderator!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks