Uzbekistan: GENETICS of Uzbeks and Tajiks and ethnic Turks Mongoloid and Caucasoid groups.

[ButlerKing]

Kalash people still score 40.1% South Asian though. What's you point?

And I told you that Behar's and Dodecad's South Asian component peaks in South India.

But you're forgetting South Asian is not exclusive to only South Indian.

I seriously doubt the 40.1% South Asian admixture in Kalash are South Indian. How the hell can it be people from South India and yet look more whiter than people from than Armenia or Georgia?

[ButlerKing]

See what I mean? there is no way in hell the component of South Asian in Kalash are from South Indian otherwise you expect them to look more like Paki.

[ABest]

But you're forgetting South Asian is not exclusive to only South Indian.

I seriously doubt the 40.1% South Asian admixture in Kalash are South Indian. How the hell can it be people from South India and yet look more whiter than people from than Armenia or Georgia?

Well, the Kalash are still almost 43% West Asian, which does explain the lighter look of those atypical individuals.

The Kalash still have many very dark types like the following:



Which makes sense, since they are 40% South Asian.

Also, keep in mind that when one googles "Kalash people" only their light types come up, because they are so unique in that region. They still have many very dark types.

[ButlerKing]

If that's your logic Paki's should look like Kalash aswell. I advice you to watch the videos. The pakistani/Indian look is a very minority and even when they do look like it is still like a light skin paki like the women you posted.

[ButlerKing]

Even dark hair ones still look more caucasian than middle eastern people.

[ABest]

I know that they are lighter than the Indian mean (obviously), but genetically that makes sense, since they are half West Asian and half South Asian. So they have some darker types (albeit not as dark as a dark Indian) and some lighter types. But on average they are not light, even if they are lighter than even Pakistanis. And, no, they would never fit in the Caucasus.

[ButlerKing]

I know that they are lighter than the Indian mean (obviously), but genetically that makes sense, since they are half West Asian and half South Asian. So they have some darker types (albeit not as dark as a dark Indian) and some lighter types. But on average they are not light, even if they are lighter than even Pakistanis. And, no, they would never fit in the Caucasus.

Well the problem with you is you keep claiming South Asian components are from South India which is not true because like I said many times there are two types of such component. Maybe Kalash are mixture of pure West Asian Aryan and light skin North Indian or whatever.

No way in hell they are mixture of half West Asian and half South Indian like Sindhi ( 60% west Asian 40% South Indian )

[ButlerKing]

See even the Rajput who are 38% South Asian + 62% West Asian look more less white you're 40.1% South Asian Kalash.

[ABest]

Well the problem with you is you keep claiming South Asian components are from South India which is not true because like I said many times there are two types of such component. Maybe Kalash are mixture of pure West Asian Aryan and light skin North Indian or whatever.

Wait, I didn't say that at all. What I said was that the South Asian component refers to genes prevalent in the Indian subcontinent. I did not imply that those genes are exclusively Dravidian-like, I was just arguing that they are prevalent in India. India is very mixed genetically at the end of the day, as you know.

Sorry for the misunderstanding. So, yes, the Kalash people are probably the lighter strains of North Indians combined with a heavy West Asian element. Of course they do not look predominantly Dravidian!

[ButlerKing]

Wait, I didn't say that at all. What I said was that the South Asian component refers to genes prevalent in the Indian subcontinent. I did not imply that those genes are exclusively Dravidian-like, I was just arguing that they are prevalent in India. India is very mixed genetically at the end of the day, as you know.

Sorry for the misunderstanding. So, yes, the Kalash people are probably the lighter strains of North Indians combined with a heavy West Asian element. Of course they do not look predominantly Dravindian!

Well you did say that it peaked 81% at some south India group called Kinadi ( spelling? ).

Well than, so you agree that the South Asian admixture in Turkic and Tajiks Central Asians have nothing to do with Indian/Paki people?