
Originally Posted by
Hevneren
I don't mean to nitpick, but it's a common misconception that there's somehow a contradiction between Atheism and Agnosticism, when in fact the two positions are answers to two different questions. Agnosticism answers the question of knowledge, and Atheism the question of belief. So, if you neither believe nor know, you can be both Agnostic and Atheist.
Obviously, you can not know something yet still choose to believe, or you can believe something yet state that you do not know.
Here are the four main positions in relation to the Agnostic/Gnostic and Atheist/Theist positions:
Gnostic Atheist = "I know that a god or gods do not exist."
Agnostic Atheist = "I don't know whether a god or gods exist or not, but I choose not to believe due to the lack of evidence." <--- my position
Agnostic Theist = "I don't know if a god or gods exist but I choose to believe in something."
Gnostic Theist = "I know that a god or gods exist."
Bookmarks