View Poll Results: Should gay men be allowed to donate blood?

Voters
6. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, otherwise it's discrimination

    2 33.33%
  • No, it increases risk of blood-borne diseases

    3 50.00%
  • No opinion

    1 16.67%
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: NI gay blood ban 'irrational', judge rules

  1. #1
    Novichok
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    British Isles
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Boer
    Ancestry
    Dutch, German, French Huguenot, British
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    Essex
    Y-DNA
    E-V13
    mtDNA
    H1b
    Taxonomy
    Norid
    Politics
    Godly
    Hero
    Jesus, the King of Kings
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    60,961
    Blog Entries
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 44,953
    Given: 45,023

    1 Not allowed!

    Default NI gay blood ban 'irrational', judge rules

    NI gay blood ban 'irrational', judge rules



    Stormont's health minister did not have the power to keep an "irrational" lifetime ban on gay men giving blood in Northern Ireland, a judge has ruled.

    The High Court judge also found that Edwin Poots had breached the ministerial code by failing to take the issue before the Stormont Executive.

    The Department of Health said Mr Poots would "read and consider" the verdict.

    The complete ban, put in place during the 1980s, was lifted in England, Scotland and Wales in November 2011.

    It was replaced by new rules that allow blood from men whose last sexual contact with another man was more than a year ago.

    The 12-month deferral was left in place following a Government Advisory Committee report.

    Beyond religious belief

    It identified a much shorter period during which infection with blood-borne viruses could not be detected.

    Mr Poots maintained the ban in Northern Ireland on the basis of ensuring public safety.

    But a gay man granted anonymity due to his perceived vulnerability launched a judicial review challenge to Mr Poots' position on blood donation.

    The judge heard claims that the minister had displayed apparent bias that went beyond religious beliefs and into the realms of prejudice.

    It was revealed in court that despite the unidentified applicant's sexual orientation, he has become a born-again Christian who now disapproves of homosexual practices.

    Attorney General John Larkin QC, the chief legal adviser to the Stormont Executive, questioned the legitimacy of the challenge.

    He claimed the challenge was a waste of time because the applicant had previously had sex for money.

    Mr Larkin rejected arguments that the issue required full executive approval and questioned whether the minister had made a decision to maintain the current ban.

    However, the judge said that in continuing the lifetime deferral policy the minister had deviated from the position taken in England, Scotland and Wales.

    'Defect in reason'

    He said the decision was made against the secretary of state's recommendation that the report from the advisory committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (SaBTO) should be followed.

    The judge held that the additional risk from deferring donation for 12 months, instead of permanently, was very minimal.

    He said: "The minister has decided that MSM (males who have sex with other males) behaviour creates such a high risk of infection to the donor that such donors must be permanently deferred with the result that such blood cannot enter the Northern Ireland blood stock.

    "Importing blood from other places which do accept MSM donors, even in limited quantities, leaves the door open for MSM blood to do just that.

    "There is clearly a defect in reason here."

    Applying different standards to imported blood defeats the whole purpose of a permanent deferral, he added.

    Declaring the decision irrational, he said: "If there is a genuine concern about the safety of MSM-donated blood, such that the blood stock must be protected absolutely from such blood, then the security of that blood must actually be maintained absolutely."

    Dealing with the alleged breach of the ministerial code, the judge said the lifetime ban was both controversial and cross-cutting, taking in equality issues.

    "As such the minister had no authority to act without bringing them to the attention of the Executive Committee which he failed to do.

    "In doing so the minister breached the ministerial code and... had no legal authority to take a decision in breach of the ministerial code."

    Sinn Féin assembly member Maeve McLaughlin, who is currently the chair of Stormont's health committee, said: "The decision raises in many people's minds serious questions as to whether Edwin Poots has the ability to carry out his duties as health minister for all.

    She added: "It goes without saying that we need to have robust screening of blood, whoever it comes from. Discriminating against people from within our community who are prepared to give blood, which would be used to save lives, needs to be reversed immediately."

    Alliance Party health spokesman Kieran McCarthy said the DUP MP's position as health minister had been "seriously compromised" and he should "consider his position".

    "He has been badly advised and now has serious questions to answer. Not only has he wasted public funds, but he also acted to prejudice one section of society in Northern Ireland," he said.

    John O'Doherty of the Rainbow Project, a gay advocacy organisation, said: "This ruling is a shocking indictment of the conduct of Minister Poots, who has proven himself incapable of separating his personal prejudices from his public responsibilities."
    Help support Apricity by making a donation

  2. #2
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last Online
    11-11-2013 @ 01:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    4,675
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 272
    Given: 132

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    ................
    Last edited by riverman; 10-13-2013 at 04:29 AM.

  3. #3
    Inquisitor Furnace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    10-21-2021 @ 07:04 PM
    Ethnicity
    Terrarian
    Country
    Norway
    Gender
    Posts
    2,838
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,303
    Given: 2,746

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    If the area has a lot of HIV infected people, I'd see a problem, otherwise no.

  4. #4
    One badass monkey Cail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    04-07-2014 @ 07:53 PM
    Location
    Professional nomad
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Corded
    Ethnicity
    European
    Ancestry
    Sleswig, Silesia, Rzeczpospolita
    Country
    Italy
    Region
    Schleswig
    Y-DNA
    N1c
    Taxonomy
    Robust horseface with a touch of mong
    Politics
    Libertarian
    Religion
    Patrick Bateman
    Age
    25
    Gender
    Posts
    2,072
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,268
    Given: 92

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Well, as long as all the blood gets screened for AIDS and the like, why not.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Last Online
    11-06-2023 @ 04:31 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Country
    England
    Gender
    Posts
    599
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 156
    Given: 65

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    What if people don't want to receive gay peoples blood? Can they opt out from receiving blood from homosexual donors and elect to only receive blood from heterosexual people? Are people guilty of discrimination if they don't want to receive blood from homosexuals?

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Online
    10-05-2014 @ 02:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    European Union
    Gender
    Posts
    9,734
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,296
    Given: 3,160

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xyresic View Post
    What if people don't want to receive gay peoples blood? Can they opt out from receiving blood from homosexual donors and elect to only receive blood from heterosexual people? Are people guilty of discrimination if they don't want to receive blood from homosexuals?
    Yeah, we might catch gay from it. (joke)

    Seriously though, I think there's a higher chance of it carrying diseases. One thing Northern Ireland does well is continues to be a truly conservative society, more so than England.

  7. #7
    Elder of Zyklon Prisoner Of Ice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Last Online
    05-27-2015 @ 05:53 PM
    Location
    Subhuman City
    Ethnicity
    Neanderthal
    Country
    United States
    Taxonomy
    Trondelag
    Religion
    Blond Jesus
    Gender
    Posts
    18,329
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 19,981
    Given: 24,682

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Seems like a bad idea. They make mistakes drawing blood and in testing all the time. This "one in a million" bullshit is just that, bullshit. The number of healthcare workers with AIDS is staggering.
    Out Of Africa Theory is a lie.
    http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...88#post3431588
    And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Do you have any phobias/irrational fears?
    By MissProvocateur in forum Psychology
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-24-2012, 06:12 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-10-2011, 03:08 PM
  3. Judge rules part of Patriot Act unconstitutional
    By European blood in forum United States
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2011, 06:53 PM
  4. Julian Assange must be extradited, judge rules
    By Treffie in forum United Kingdom
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-25-2011, 02:41 PM
  5. Federal Judge Rules on Same-Sex Marriage Benefits
    By Æmeric in forum United States
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-05-2009, 11:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •