People who speculate about people's ancestry

[Svarog]

What do you think about them: people who engage in guesswork about foreign ancestry of other people?

from experience, these people who accuses, guesses etc other people ancestry the most usually have some 'foreign' in their own - complex kicks in or triggers happy.. not sure

[Tabiti]

This is not quite intelligent action an individual can make to fight with his enemies. On the other hand if someone has significant % of foreign blood (like 1/4 or 1/8) he must share that before becoming part of a society in which his ancestry could be used as a weapon against him.

[Anthropos]

I guess I got your idea.

But why such disgust towards any concept of race/breed/whatever?

Yes, I wonder that too. What are you talking about? Just because I don't worship and praise the race, and show respect for it as some kind of idol, you think that the concept disgusts me?

Why this pic for avatar? It would make sense in a SOS Racism site, but why here?

Are you sure?

• You never felt that there was an overload of useless information about race?
• You never got disgusted by those who refused to mention a thing by its proper name and who thus denigrated other (much more important) things than race to a subhuman level?
• What about those immensely essential-to-preservation guardians of race who kept interrupting discussions putting into question the sincerity of other quite expendable debaters regarding the information they gave about their nationality, ethnicity and ancestry?
• And what of all of those who kept racialising any subject, something that could be even worse than the former point on a discussion board, seeing as it could, in so far as there is a consensus on it, diminish the scope of debate, reducing the whole community to a nearsighted viewpoint?

It's always on the verge of tipping over, with people implying that it is not really okay for me (or anyone else) to opt out of pseudo-religious racialism.

[Svanhild]

Some people on the street or online look odd and I wonder if it's something about their ancestry. It's normal to speculate about people's ancestry if you're aware of the problems of ethnic mixing and mass immigration. And if you can check your speculations for substance in a talk, well, that's the best case.

[December]

Yes, I wonder that too. What are you talking about? Just because I don't worship and praise the race, and show respect for it as some kind of idol, you think that the concept disgusts me?

You seem to be much more altered towards racialism then I ever was, am or will be.

You never felt that there was an overload of useless information about race?

I feel that there's an overload of completely unscientific info about the human race with fierce support (in keeping it this way) from the same people who support the social tragedy. The big propaganda is: "we are 99% equal to chimps THUS we must be forbidden of talking about the racial part of our nature". Makes all the sense of the world.

You never got disgusted by those who refused to mention a thing by its proper name and who thus denigrated other (much more important) things than race to a subhuman level?

What do you mean?

What about those immensely essential-to-preservation guardians of race who kept interrupting discussions putting into question the sincerity of other quite expendable debaters regarding the information they gave about their nationality, ethnicity and ancestry?

I saw worse. I saw people who blacklisted entire subraces and nations based on their experience with a couple of individuals who, e.g., are supposedly "alpine" or "steppic".

And what of all of those who kept racialising any subject, something that could be even worse than the former point on a discussion board, seeing as it could, in so far as there is a consensus on it, diminish the scope of debate, reducing the whole community to a nearsighted viewpoint?

Yes, I saw all Croatians despised and discredited in some forum because one sole Croatian individual had an indecent behaviour.

But speaking about nearsightedness, what about that individual (you happen to be friend of) wanting to lynch and publicly discredit me, by taking advantage of a single post I made about marrying Kate Beckinsale but not a mulatta? Isn't that diminishing the scope of a subject with the sole purpose of ridicularizing someone with red herring?

What shall I do? Use an avatar saying "screw dishonest people"?

It's always on the verge of tipping over, with people implying that it is not really okay for me (or anyone else) to opt out of pseudo-religious racialism.

You seem 10 times more commited to anti-racialism than I am or ever was to racialism. As we don't have already millions of all types of anti-racist/racialist GOs and NGOs officially censoring and oppressing even our own thoughts, making we feel extreme guilt for having any kind of natural thought about the beauty of human races and preference to keep them alive.

By the screw-race logic, we should shun lions for prefering lions instead of tigers.

[Anthropos]

You seem to be much more altered towards racialism then I ever was, am or will be. [...] You seem 10 times more commited to anti-racialism than I am or ever was to racialism, [...] officially censoring and oppressing even our own thoughts, making we feel extreme guilt for having any kind of natural thought about the beauty of human races and preference to keep them alive.

I are racial cat. This is RACIAL thread.

[December]

[Anthropos]

'African Viking'.

No, I'm sorry, you don't count as a Christian, and I thought you were Portugese, not an African of the black race? Be that as it may, I despise and scorn the 'Cultural Catholicism' that seems to be so abundantly represented in some nutty nationalist circles!

[Grumpy Cat]

I've been accused of "lying about my ancestry" by some racists for having darker skin (it's called a tan, something that happens when you get off your computer and go outside for a while) and having thick, coarse, curly hair (caused by my thyroid condition). It's stupid. I know what my ancestry is better than anyone else would.

[Phil75231]

Speculating about ancestry is good for a hobby, but bad for judging a person's worth or intelligence. With all due respect to classification and typology posters, I find that about as enlightening as astrology and palmistry, except in the clearest cases (SSA skulls vs N. Euro and E. Asian skulls, for example). Using typology for finer distinctions between human populations (especially skull structure) doesn't seem like a productive exercise, IMO.