0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
C3 is found highest frequencies in Mongolians, Buryats, Tungustic, North Koreans, Manchus
D2 is found only Japanese, Ainu, Jomon, Okinawans, and very little D2 in South Korea.
D2 in Japan is as low as 29% to as high as 56% although the average is 33% and 36%.
I find it strange that M7b is highest in people who I think also have connection with Jomon even though many Taiwanese aborigines are different to others. Others tribes paint on their mouths just like the Ainu women which is strange to me.
They are all pure Mongoloid too that existed more than 60,000 to 100,000 years ago before modern East Asian Mongoloid features started developing gradually.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,048 Given: 987 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,048 Given: 987 |
This is why I quoted lengthily from Oetzi, I know you are going to make ainu and jomon a paleolithic incident.
As I have shown, 5000 years is enough to develop a unique subclade. The unique Oetzi subclade proves it.
100 000 years mutation and migration by continental drift history is very fresh and warm bullshit.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,048 Given: 987 |
78 samples are not enough to determind distribution among ancient Japan as a whole, of course we may exclude Ryuku and Okinawa.Ancient Yayoi 78 samples
Japanese 1312 samples
Ancient Jomon 56 samples
Mongoloid mtDNA in Europe is very low to completely absent.
And yayoi migration is still being dealt as mythology in Japan, I guess they just automatically designated M7a free population as yayoi, what is the cultural background of each population?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,048 Given: 987 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
It's still Caucasoid origin even if it mutated in Siberia/Turkic homeland in Altay in 600 B.C
However if that's the case than one cannot even say central Asians have mostly true Caucasoid Y-DNA, because at least 10-20% of R1 in Caucasoid looking Turkic in Central Asia were contributed by 3/4 Mongoloid males similar to Kyrgyz including 30-40% by Mongolian C3, O3, Siberian Q, N, Tibetan D2.
So can say we central Asian Mongoloid paternal DNA is more than 50-60%?
R1a in mix Mongoloid and mostly Mongoloid Turkic men had already existed since the Pazyryk culture in Altay
For example even south siberia predominately Mongoloid men R1a had married caucasoid women. Even in 300 BC the men with mostly R1a who married Caucasoid women were 3/4 Mongoloid.
"Craniological studies of samples from the Pazyryk burials revealed the presence of both Mongoloid and Caucasoid components in this population. [4] quoting G. F. Debets on the physical characteristics of the population in the Pazyryk kurgans, records a mixed population. The men would seem to be part Mongoloid and the women Europoid. [5] "
Historically Kyrgyz men had migrated to southern central Asia and married Uzbek women/Tajik women, some were result of kidnapping brides
This can still be seen today interracial marriage statistic by Kyrgyz men
" Among Kirgiz men living in Uzbekistan and married to non-Kirgiz women, 9.6% had married Russians, 25.6% Uzbeks, and 34.3% Tatars. Among Kazakh men in Uzbekistan, the structure of mixed marriages appeared as follows: 4.4% married Russians.[67] "
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks