2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,886 Given: 26,289 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,886 Given: 26,289 |
as for thread question, I suggest name changing from ''Macedonia'' to ''Antonia''. That's my final proposal to the negociators.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,848 Given: 2,744 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,093 Given: 225 |
Fyrom will not have any chance to change the name and survive.
Albanians will decide about the fate of gypsy fyromskis and in the end we will keep our word and give the eastern part to Bulgaria.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,093 Given: 225 |
Even in this idiotic map what is today's western Fyrom, is included as an illyrian ruled of influenced lands, including skopje.
The map doesn't include dardanians who had their center in Skopje and ruled northern Fyrom until roman invasion in 90 bc.
The dardanian king of the United Illyrian Kingdom, Bardhyli, almost conquered all Macedonian Kingdom in 360BC if it wasn't for Philip that stopped him.
Paonians were probably brother nations to illyrians . ( just like the common ancient macedonian people)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,093 Given: 225 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 2,615 |
Exactly, Macedonians are confused enough as it is. Once the name of the state is changed, their identity will be up for grabs.
50/50 with Bulgaria or simply keep it as it is should be the goal of Albanians. Either we get a large enough part of it to make the split worth it, or just aim to be a significant part of the whole thing. I mean Albanians as 1/3, alpha-dominating the whole shit is kind of nice, I like the current status.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks