PDA

View Full Version : Speed of eating 'key to obesity'



Vulpix
10-22-2008, 09:32 AM
BBC News (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7681458.stm): Wolfing down meals may be enough to nearly double a person's risk of being overweight, Japanese research suggests.


Osaka University scientists looked at the eating habits of 3,000 people and reported their findings in the British Medical Journal.
Problems in signalling systems which tell the body when to stop eating may be partly responsible, said a UK nutrition expert.
He said deliberately slowing down at mealtimes might impact on weight.
The latest study looked at the relationship between eating speed, feelings of "fullness" and being overweight.
Just under half of the 3,000 volunteers told researchers they tended to eat quickly.
Compared with those who did not eat quickly, fast-eating men were 84% more likely to be overweight, and women were just over twice as likely.
Those, who, in addition to wolfing down their meals, tended to eat until they felt full, were more than three times more likely to be overweight.



Stomach signals

Professor Ian McDonald, from the University of Nottingham, said that there were a number of reasons why eating fast could be bad for your weight.
He said it could interfere with a signalling system which tells your brain to stop eating because your stomach is swelling up.
He said: "If you eat quickly you basically fill your stomach before your gastric feedback has a chance to start developing - you can overfill the thing."
He said that rushing meals was a behaviour that might have been learned in infancy, and could be reversed, although this might not be easy.
"The old wives' tale about chewing everything 20 times might be true - if you did take a bit more time eating, it could have an impact."



'Biological imperative

In an accompanying editorial, Australian researchers Dr Elizabeth Denney-Wilson and Dr Karen Campbell, said that a mechanism that helps make us fat today may, until relatively recently, have been an evolutionary advantage, helping us grab more food when resources were scarce.
They said that, if possible, children should be encouraged to eat slowly, and allowed to stop when they felt full up at mealtimes.



Dr Jason Halford, Director of the Kissileff Human Ingestive Behaviour Laboratory at the University of Liverpool, said that the way we eat was slowly being seen as a key area in obesity research, especially since the publication of studies highlighting a genetic variant linked to "feelings of fullness".



His own work, recently published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology, found that anti-obesity drug sibutramine worked by slowing down the rate at which obese patients ate.
He said: "What the Japanese research shows is that individual differences in eating behaviour underlie over-consumption of food and are linked to obesity.



"Other research has found evidence of this in childhood, suggesting that it could be inherited or learned at a very early age."
He said that there was no evidence yet that trying to slow down mealtimes for children would have an impact on future obesity rates. .

HvS
11-13-2008, 09:58 PM
Well, interesting and frightening points ;). It's a common use of words like "a key to something" in such articles, the problem is definitely more complicated. Therefore I might give some other tips to eat healthier: :cool: :coffee:

a) the most common problem, I think, is combining together different types of food. It's all about the time of digestion - if you eat fast-digestible products together with slow-digestible, they will become a horrible, indigestible, rotting monster in your guts. puke
For example you shouldn't eat bread and meat or potatoes and meat together (but you can eat rice and meat instead :D).
As a indigestible monster, food will stuck in strange nooks of your intestines, rot there, and cause firstly powerful gas, secondly - poison to your organism. Blah. And you get a small part of useful vitamins, fats etc. that has been eaten, causing their sooner deficiency than normally - hunger comes back faster.

b) drinking while eating - well, the effects are similar to these in point a). Better drink before every meal.

c) you shouldn't sleep after finishing the meal

Well, at least wine is healthy.

Oresai
11-14-2008, 05:22 AM
An older woman`s perspective...:D
When I was growing up, in my parents generation one rarely saw an obese person. Yet they ate what we nowadays deem `unhealthy` foods....lot of meat, carbs and fats (I remember my slender mother eating bread and dripping (bacon fat) regularly as a snack!).
The reason why, I believe, is that they were not so sedentary as we are now...they worked, and worked hard. They never `exercised` in the way of gym work or weights....but I was raised in the country, with no public transport, and even though we had a car we walked a great deal (petrol, even then, was expensive) and worked hard, looking after the animals and croft. Our lives were our exercise, we had lifestyles that meant we moved a lot and didn`t get the chance to put weight on!
I also remember plenty of respectably old folks, most of them pretty damn fit too, despite eating all those `unhealthy` foods.
Again, these folks had worked hard all their lives, many of them refusing to retire, wanting to keep active...and I`ll go one step further and say that once they did give up work and retire, they went rapidly downhill...a combination, I believe, of despondancy...(some of them felt with work going, they had little to live for) and sedenatary lifestyles from the ceasing of work.
If you want a `key`, plain and simply I believe it`s exercise, but not so much in the form of gym work etc, but by leading an old fashioned lifestyle where you incorporate it into your day....housework, performed with a little elbow grease instead of the latest gadget, (no, I`m not advocating getting rid of the washing machine :P ) and walking to work if it isn`t too far instead of taking the car or bus, gardening, whatever it takes to get you moving. Such a lifestyle also has benefits over exercising...you end up with a clean house/being more alert at work/food from the garden, whatever, instead of just walking out the gym with nothing to show for it except an empty wallet. ;)
We may be one of the first generations with the relative luxury to choose how to eat in such a way that we consider our health in this way.
But throughout history for the most part, the bulk of folks simply had to eat what was available. I wish I could find the source now but I read recently that it`s a modern myth that more folks are living longer. Perhaps more are surviving into middle age but according to the stats I read, the average lifespan is still seventy-something.
Hate to sound like a Luddite, but maybe instead of specialists looking for the latest fat busting pill etc, they should consider removing folks cars and tv`s...and getting them back to work on the land....
(waits for roars of disapproval, hee...:P)
And y`know, during the second world war in the UK, the nation was at it`s very fittest, because of the rationing of food and the labour-intensive lifestyles people led. Something to think about. :)