PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Occupation Fueling Afghan “Insurgency”



Sol Invictus
10-28-2009, 12:24 PM
October 27, 2009

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/26/AR2009102603394_pf.html

When Matthew Hoh joined the Foreign Service early this year, he was exactly the kind of smart civil-military hybrid the administration was looking for to help expand its development efforts in Afghanistan.

A former Marine Corps captain with combat experience in Iraq, Hoh had also served in uniform at the Pentagon, and as a civilian in Iraq and at the State Department. By July, he was the senior U.S. civilian in Zabul province, a Taliban hotbed.

But last month, in a move that has sent ripples all the way to the White House, Hoh, 36, became the first U.S. official known to resign in protest over the Afghan war, which he had come to believe simply fueled the insurgency.
“I have lost understanding of and confidence in the strategic purposes of the United States’ presence in Afghanistan,” he wrote Sept. 10 in a four-page letter to the department’s head of personnel.

“I have doubts and reservations about our current strategy and planned future strategy, but my resignation is based not upon how we are pursuing this war, but why and to what end.”

The reaction to Hoh’s letter was immediate. Senior U.S. officials, concerned that they would lose an outstanding officer and perhaps gain a prominent critic, appealed to him to stay.

RoyBatty
10-28-2009, 08:30 PM
The primary reasons why USrael and NATO are in Afghanistan, in no particular order:

- To attack Iran
- The opium trade (involving themselves of course)
- To antagonise and plot against Russia
- To gain another foothold into Central Asia and energy resources there

Sol Invictus
11-03-2009, 05:42 AM
Basically, yes. It's never been about winning it,
It's about prolonging it. War is big business, and so are agendas.