PDA

View Full Version : In 1882 Anatolian Turks was considered Mongolian - Caucasian variety by anthropologist Henry Keane



ButlerKing
12-13-2013, 02:39 AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_Henry_Keane
Augustus Henry Keane (1833–1912) was an Irish Roman Catholic journalist and linguist, known for his ethnological writings.


In 1882 Augustus Henry Keane said the Mongolic type included the following races: Tibetans, Burmese, Tai, Koreans, Japanese, Lu-Chu, Finno-Tatars and Malays.[16] Keane said the following peoples are mixed Mongolo-Caucasic varieties: Anatolian Turks, Uzbegs, and Tajiks of Turkestan.[16] Keane said the Kazaks are intermediate between the Túrki and Mongolian races.[16] Keane said the Mongolian race is best represented by the Buriats.[16]

SardiniaAtlantis
12-13-2013, 02:40 AM
Many Anatolian Turks do have Mongoloid Dna... I see nothing wrong with this.

Shah-Jehan
12-13-2013, 02:42 AM
now go masturbate on your discovery:)

ButlerKing
12-13-2013, 02:43 AM
Many Anatolians do have Mongoloid Dna... I see nothing wrong with this.

Yeah but to consider them mix Mongoloid-Caucasian varieties seems strange even for me.
Their Mongoloid admixture usually ranges only from 5% - 18.5% with a very few 20-22%.

I prefer to say Caucasoid with slight mongoloid mixture.

SardiniaAtlantis
12-13-2013, 02:46 AM
Ive seen some range up to 30% but Id say Caucasoid with mongoloid admixture would be the proper way to describe them true.

ButlerKing
12-13-2013, 02:47 AM
now go masturbate on your discovery:)

It really does prove Turks were considered Mongols even by europeans in 19th century. I though this was something recent by greeks and Armenians.

Maybe he meant turks with features like these

http://www.galatasaray.org/images/sporcular/1/EmreGungor_B.jpg
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TLrf-8Ag7gE/0.jpg
http://www.amoeba.com/dynamic-images/blog/Eric_B/turkish-women.jpg
http://www.greenprophet.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/TURKISH.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/1447gop.jpg

ButlerKing
12-13-2013, 02:51 AM
Ive seen some range up to 30% but Id say Caucasoid with mongoloid admixture would be the proper way to describe them true.


It could be that ottoman Turks in the past were somewhat more mongoloid than today's Turks because it's true about million of european and balkan slaves migrated to Turkey and mixed with ottoman soldiers and I this could have diluted their mongoloid DNA by 5 - 10%. There was also the turkification of Greeks of Instanbul including and the Armenian and Kurdish who took up Turkic identity to avoid persecution and discrimination.

ButlerKing
01-01-2014, 10:57 AM
http://bestuff.com/images/images_of_stuff/210x600/brandon-lee-5116.jpg

Compare bruce lee son brandon lee wit turkish

http://studyis.tjm.netdna-cdn.com/sites/study-islam.org/files/images/430/IMG_0275.jpg
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/559/56357071dy0.jpg

Smeagol
01-01-2014, 11:57 AM
Fascinating.

Mehmet
01-01-2014, 12:05 PM
Yes, Turks are Turanids and still are.
In Turkey you have around 10-15% Siberian/East Asian influence. Not so low from Turkmenistan people (ancestors of Turks, same ethno-genesis).

In thirties, German Nazi anthropologs who 'loved' Turks classified them as "Caucasoids", as Turks and Germans were allies during WW1 and Turkey was very German-friendly.
Actually when Germans reached Stalingrad, Jews from Turkey were sent to Eastern Anatolia, in working camps.

By the way Butlerking.
You are butthurt, 'Aryan' Persian.
No matter how Mongoloid Turks happen to be, they will forever look better than you Iranids, wannabe whites with swarthy skin, hairy face and huge noses.
Keep envying.

Equilibrium
01-01-2014, 12:42 PM
Ive seen some range up to 30% but Id say Caucasoid with mongoloid admixture would be the proper way to describe them true.

I think most are easily over 70% Mongoloid, therefor I think it would be more precise to say pred. Mongoloid with minor Caucasoid input.

ButlerKing
01-01-2014, 02:04 PM
Yes, Turks are Turanids and still are.
In Turkey you have around 10-15% Siberian/East Asian influence. Not so low from Turkmenistan people (ancestors of Turks, same ethno-genesis).

In thirties, German Nazi anthropologs who 'loved' Turks classified them as "Caucasoids", as Turks and Germans were allies during WW1 and Turkey was very German-friendly.
Actually when Germans reached Stalingrad, Jews from Turkey were sent to Eastern Anatolia, in working camps.

By the way Butlerking.
You are butthurt, 'Aryan' Persian.
No matter how Mongoloid Turks happen to be, they will forever look better than you Iranids, wannabe whites with swarthy skin, hairy face and huge noses.
Keep envying.

I am pure white while you are diluted Caucasoid, you may look Caucasoids but your eyes and DNA betray your people.
I'm not Iranids or Armenians but even Armenians look very European and White. I rather be a Armenian, they are pure Caucasoids not like your Turkish Turks

http://www.adopt-abroad.com/RF246603.jpg
http://www.forcedmigration.org/photograph-directory/armenian-children-who-had-to-flee-azerbaijan/image_preview


Turkmen aren't real Turks either with the acception of 10% who look much closer to Mongoloid race. I've read the history of Turkmenistan and the people who inhabited their first were Iranians and Oghuz mixed.


1/2 of Turkey are 2 - 8% Mongoloid, 1/3 are 8- 15%, 1/10 are 15 - 18.5%

1/2 of Turkmenistan are 13-27% Mongoloid, 1/3 are 27 - 50% Mongoloid, 1/10 are 50 - 58%

Mehmet
01-01-2014, 02:09 PM
I actually look Turanid, I'm not 'pure Caucasoid'. If I were pure Caucasoid, I'd be bothered.
Turkmenistan is same as Turkey, they just endured the Mongol invasion and some tens of thousands Indian slaves Tamerlane brought from his Delhi campaign, 1398-1400.
Their core is the same as Turkish Turks' core.

Despite 1000 years...


Armenians are actually close to you Farsis and Kurds in terms of look, better said colors.
However you differ from them with your Medish skull shapes; whereas they have round heads.

ButlerKing
01-01-2014, 02:13 PM
I actually look Turanid, I'm not 'pure Caucasoid'. If I were pure Caucasoid, I'd be bothered.
Turkmenistan is same as Turkey, they just endured the Mongol invasion and some tens of thousands Indian slaves Tamerlane brought from his Delhi campaign, 1398-1400.
Their core is the same as Turkish Turks' core.

Despite 1000 years...

That's a lie man, we all know Turkish people are bothered by their Mongol roots.

The Turanid that Turkey have is Caucasoid with small to substantial Mongoloid admixture. Turkmen are the only Turks in Central Asia that lacks Mongolian DNA even the Tajiks have more. Turkmen have much Siberian DNA which is obviously original Turkic DNA.

Siberian Cold Breeze
01-01-2014, 02:17 PM
I am pure white while you are diluted Caucasoid, you may look Caucasoids but your eyes and DNA betray your people.
I'm not Iranids or Armenians but even Armenians look very European and White. I rather be a Armenian, they are pure Caucasoids not like your Turkish Turks

Any photo of yours ? Should we take your words as proof ?



we all know Turkish people are bothered by their Mongol roots.

actually ,just the opposite
I am only bothered by your weird obsession about mongoloid people in general ,you don't create any other topic in this forum and others ..
this is a really unusual case..I sincerely wonder the story behind it..you sound like a self hating quadroon