View Full Version : Tidbits on secular heathenry, FOR Rome & Christianity (even for the race-mixing West)
The Gentile Greek Zeus took the Semitic Phoenician Europa as bedmate and the Continent was born.
Europa and Arabia may have the same etymology, so what is wrong about Eurabia?
The Trojans stopped off at Phoenician Carthage before moving in with the Etruscans (Tuscans) and founding Roma in one case, then Britain and Cornwall under Brutus of Italy and Quirinius (Corineus) of Spain.
Adonis is a Greek god of Semitic origin, whose name is cognate to Adonai and Aten, the mono-deity of Akhenaten (admittedly Canaanite), first non-Jew to hold THE God alone, trampling above the false gods of idols. Thus, Helios and Eloi are one and the same, the same as Aten, with the sun and the sun cross representative of God's chief handiwork in Creation.
In Christ there is both Jew and Greek...Abraham and Plato, Moses and Aristotle.
Rome became an empire in slavish imitation of Alexander the Great's triumph over the Aryans, whose dominions and tributary peoples subject to Persia included not only Israel, but Ethiopia and Armenia, cradles of Christianity.
The Roman alphabet that we all use is based on a Greek adaptation of Phoenician script. Runes were of Etruscan origin...Rome, after taking over their Greek parents' Phoenician neighbours' Carthaginian colonies, pummeled the Gauls under Caesar, before turning back to the Etruscan factor, this time, by Augustus in Germania.
Goths from Sweden became Christian before the Irish (with the unintelligible Ogham script) and wrote the earliest Pater Noster in a "barbarian" language, which essentially means, that Gothic script was a hybrid of Greek, Latin and Etruscan-derived runes. Sure, Wulfila taught a different conception of God than the Trinitarian kind, but it certainly was a far better improvement than making human sacrifices to figures made of the human hand, or to men, living or dead.
Paul said that Gentiles did not have to circumcise, only abandon idolatry. Paul also spoke to the Gauls of Anatolia and converted them before Rome accepted Christ, which is the ultimate source of Joseph of Arimathea being in Glastonbury, considering the fact that there was a linguistic continuum between the Celts of Galatia and Gallia, whilst Britain had a steady stream of Parisians, Belgae and Silureans (from Spain, where St. James is patron saint) no less.
Christians were once the most avowed antisemites, for one reason only...which seems to be done overkill by the heathen crowd, who hate the Jews only for their own sake and not any higher purpose because of the ramifications to mankind by their actions in deicide.
Genesis speaks of how the scions of Japheth, i.e. the Gentiles, would follow in the footsteps of Shem, i.e. the Semites. There was no ultimatum how this would come about in the long run, only that they would share in the rule over the Canaanites, i.e. the Blacks.
Our heathen ancestors already made the decision to accept the God of Abraham and even factored Odin (in his guise as a man) into the kings' lists as proving descent from Adam as the Ur-human, the All Father under God the Creator.
The Franks/Germans have proven time after time that they wish to hold the reigns on definition of Christianity, so it passed from Arianism, to Hussitism, to Lutheranism and Calvinism. Their immense interest in Rome and Christianity led them to found whole countries in the Holy Land and even take over, not only the original Rome, but also Constantinople, as well as build the future of the Baltic states, all of whom were unrepentant pagan pirates, who were being taught lessons from those who already learnt Amazing Grace despite their viking ancestors, just as the Franks and others taught them.
We have spread this "Christendom" around the globe and it brought us superpower status, even with such scientifically progressive confidence as the moon landing by the most fundamentalist Christian country in the world (and done by no other). Enemies abound and there are those who take more than a second guess at our preservationism, by revisionist fantasies which make them culpable 5th columnists. This old Cold War, Soviet infowar clawing at the hearts and minds, will not destroy or compromise my fidelity to the Faith and the Eternal City.
God Himself assented to rendering unto God and Caesar what belongs to them. Caesar is much more selfish and is the enslaver of the world, but even God admits his worth in a practical sense. I am no man-worshiper and would do as much as the praetorian guard to get rid of egomaniacs like Nero and Caligula, but Constantine is the man for us all to emulate...Julian the Apostate dithered, but his objections were nothing other than to take in stride.
Charlemagne was Augustus and his ancestor Clovis was Constantine.
Nietzsche means nothing because he values nothing above himself, as all is nihilism--certainly nothing to offer and only to take away. Kierkegaard is the most humble servant of God and deserves praise with God's bounty, if for nothing other than contrast to the former, covering the same issues of philosophy in which they share similarities.
All of the ground I cover here is well established and to treasure it, means to preserve Europe. To question and debase it, is to criticise oneself, their parents and ancient ancestors all the same. It is no such thing called preservationism. One cannot save Europa by destroying her.
God/Odin (Deus, Zeus, Tyr) save Queen Europa! It is to you we owe gratitude, not the "will to power" of wannabe demigods! Alexander and the 300 Spartans were enough to prove that the Aryan myth is worthless, save for its role in providing the infrastructure for world domination, as Aryana was the very first multiracial empire on earth, since the Tower of Babel. Iranians had Asians and Africans under their wings, from India to Ethiopia, not excepting the Macedonians themselves in Europe.
Aryan mythology today, is in supreme denial of its absolutist cosmopolitanism, at the juncture of three Old World continents, race-mixing and yet, still to provide European supremacy. Support of Christendom and Judaism over Islam may continue this comfort of riding high, but Islamophilia may just make that all the more difficult, since Islam comes from the false Jew of Revelation, Ishmael, the Canaanite.
Aryan mythology holds for some Oriental supremacy in the form of the White man, but what is essentially more true, is the fact that Eden was not very far from what became Persia, whilst the lands East of Eden were abominable. Thus, the Westward Movement and Manifest Destiny began in mankind's preferred movement best tracked by the journey of Abraham from Ur on the Persian Gulf, a subset of the Indian Ocean, to Canaan and elsewhere, with the Egyptian and Babylonian captivities, before the Aryans themselves freed the Jews to rebuild their temple, by decree of the emperors themselves.
Prayer to Jerusalem used to be prayer to Eden, so the wise men certainly must have a consistent message...whether or not this has an Aryan meaning is irrelevant...but the Aryan myth is a lie if it denies the essential pride behind Iran, that it is the first race-mixing society in history, after the people went their separate ways originally. Persia was the trinity of blood. Empire building brought this all about.
I'm sure many more will hate America now for my "ramblings" of assorted facts in support of POV they absolutely despise. Oh for sure, it should be a bannable offence!
:coffee:
EDIT: Then again, I just as well might support Islam if only for its Aryan qualities, rather than the subjective provincialism of heathenry which hates objectively universalist Christianity.
Heathenry or Aryanism? Christianity apparently has both, so it is no wonder that others, who nevertheless hate Christianity, also do like both.
Poltergeist
11-22-2009, 10:29 AM
LOL
Osweo
11-23-2009, 01:39 AM
:shrug:
Gooding
11-23-2009, 01:57 AM
Interesting..:ranger:
Maybe I should have addressed the footie game. Oh, such brilliant minds we have...
Aemma
11-23-2009, 05:53 PM
....
All of the ground I cover here is well established and to treasure it, means to preserve Europe. To question and debase it, is to criticise oneself, their parents and ancient ancestors all the same. It is no such thing called preservationism. One cannot save Europa by destroying her.
....
All of the so-called ground you've covered my friend is but one man's opinion--yours. Let's not get delusional now and think that you're speaking on behalf of the rest of the world and know the "Truth" about everything. :rolleyes:
Trencavel
11-23-2009, 06:02 PM
Me likes it !
Just try to avoid offensive language, I guess...
Not from this article... but for the last thread that was getting hot and ended up closed !
All of the so-called ground you've covered my friend is but one man's opinion--yours. Let's not get delusional now and think that you're speaking on behalf of the rest of the world and know the "Truth" about everything. :rolleyes:Oh yeah, I guess it's okay to bash me but not okay to disagree with sociopathic, Christopube heathen fundamentalism in the mold of Nietzsche, a la Psychonaut, dictator and censor?
Go ahead and ban me bitch!:coffee:
Scyldwulf
11-23-2009, 06:05 PM
:laugh:
Aemma
11-23-2009, 06:17 PM
Oh yeah, I guess it's okay to bash me but not okay to disagree with sociopathic, Christopube heathen fundamentalism in the mold of Nietzsche, a la Psychonaut, dictator and censor?
Go ahead and ban me bitch!:coffee:
Get a grip O.F. But anymore of this kind of outburst and you'll be getting more than a big old lump of coal in your Christmas stocking, you hear me? You are Christian are you not? I can't tell right now really, what with all of your not so turn-the-other-cheek type of comments.
So make life simple for yourself O. F.: Why don't you go in your own Christian section and do whatever it is you would like to do there instead of bothering non-Christians in their own section? Hmm?
I am already effectively banned from Psychonaut's torture chamber, so stop kicking me when I'm down.
Maybe you want to be bashed, or maybe you just don't want to be bashed for bashing?
Fuck off Nero/Diocletian!
Eldritch
11-23-2009, 06:21 PM
Oh yeah, I guess it's okay to bash me but not okay to disagree with sociopathic, Christopube heathen fundamentalism in the mold of Nietzsche, a la Psychonaut, dictator and censor?
Go ahead and ban me bitch!:coffee:
I don't understand why Aemma even bothers talking to you anymore. But I do hope you get what you wish for. :rolleyes:
Gooding
11-23-2009, 06:25 PM
Oh yeah, I guess it's okay to bash me but not okay to disagree with sociopathic, Christopube heathen fundamentalism in the mold of Nietzsche, a la Psychonaut, dictator and censor?
Go ahead and ban me bitch!:coffee:
One thing Aemma is certainly not and that is a bitch. I'm Catholic, too, man, and she's never attacked me at all, for religion or anything else. In fact, people who hold strong beliefs tend to be respected, be they Catholic, Protestant, Heathen or anything else.Just as long as they don't attack anyone else's beliefs, people tend to enjoy wonderful conversations about ancestry, issues that affect us as a people and yes, religious orientations on this forum.
Allenson
11-23-2009, 07:06 PM
What ever happened to manners?
Svipdag
11-23-2009, 08:07 PM
This post is incoherent, in places incomprehensible, and rife with debatable assertions. I find it difficult to determine whether your objective was to enlighten or to provoke. I cannot understand why you believe that it would tend to encourage anti-Americanism.
Nota Bene, I am not "bashing" you. I am criticising your post as badly in need of editing and of some sort of corroboratory references pertaining to some of your controversial and unsubstantiated assertions. E.g., Virgil to the contrary notwithstanding, nobody today takes seriously the notion that ex-pat. Trojans founded Rome.
If it were clearly and coherently written, your post could stimulate much debate. However, it is not and will not be taken seriously, especially in the light of your knee-jerk ad hominem attacks in response to any negative comments.
lei.talk
11-23-2009, 10:42 PM
Moderator Hat On
One more time Ødhvidh Fridhason (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/member.php?u=761), this is not the appropriate venue for Christian apologetics. Since you are not a Heathen, please confine your critiques of Heathenry to those which are based in sourceable, historical references or logically posited arguments. Pronouncements about the "Truth of Abraham" or "redeeming wayward souls" do not belong here. Further posts to this effect will be deleted.
Moderator Hat Off"effectively banned" :icon1:
only if one is unable to produce
"sourceable, historical references or logically posited arguments"
to the subject.
rise to the challenge! http://www.theapricity.com/forum/images/icons/icon14.gif
Oh uh.. internets... drama.....
http://www.nastyhobbit.org/data/media/2/must-not-fap.jpg
What ever happened to manners?
Remember what Jesus said!
I have not come to bring peace but a sword.
His mooks are more often than not talebearers, tattletales and general party-poopers.
I don't understand why Aemma even bothers talking to you anymore. But I do hope you get what you wish for. :rolleyes:She followed me around from the beginning of my membership and I have half-enjoyed it until now. Her nosiness ought to be less than apologetic for unreasonable people who hate being admonished for being unreasonable to other people from the get-go. I hold those people accountable and then their agnostic friends jump to enable their sociopathic delusions, called "rescue". It is the same knee-jerk mentality as those who hate the Pope because one of their own family members is a flaming faggot and likely going to Hell for all they care. Sure: "fuck the police", right? Criminal minds hatch the most self-defeating plots ever known to man.
One thing Aemma is certainly not and that is a bitch. I'm Catholic, too, man, and she's never attacked me at all, for religion or anything else. In fact, people who hold strong beliefs tend to be respected, be they Catholic, Protestant, Heathen or anything else.Just as long as they don't attack anyone else's beliefs, people tend to enjoy wonderful conversations about ancestry, issues that affect us as a people and yes, religious orientations on this forum.Yes, attack the subject, not the person. Of course, that's something to be followed, but praising massacres of monks is not legal or moral, so to be criticised for it, as an example, is not unfounded. Who wants to drink from my skull, burn and pillage, rape the local women and toss children to the sword? Anybody who advocates this ought to be killed right now, so there is nothing wrong in criticising such positions!
A similar rationale is afforded to holding people accountable for mass libels based in historical conspiracy theories about a religion, mixed with other revisionist psychobabble, or simply, at other times and in reply to criticism, abusive one-liners, no matter how reasoned and well composed, well balanced the response. It is obvious that the malefactors are projecting their own self-awareness of guilt onto those they slander. Satan=slanderer.
What ever happened to manners?Aemma cannot seriously be offended at my responses, if she coddles those of others. All you people who avoided the subject matter to make this personal ought to look in the mirror. The topic is extremely derailed by all of this ad hominemism, that addresses none of the points, for better or worse.
This post is incoherent, in places incomprehensible, and rife with debatable assertions. I find it difficult to determine whether your objective was to enlighten or to provoke. I cannot understand why you believe that it would tend to encourage anti-Americanism.
Nota Bene, I am not "bashing" you. I am criticising your post as badly in need of editing and of some sort of corroboratory references pertaining to some of your controversial and unsubstantiated assertions. E.g., Virgil to the contrary notwithstanding, nobody today takes seriously the notion that ex-pat. Trojans founded Rome.
If it were clearly and coherently written, your post could stimulate much debate. However, it is not and will not be taken seriously, especially in the light of your knee-jerk ad hominem attacks in response to any negative comments.Hey I really appreciate this reply. It is really what should have been the first. You are the most wise of anybody here, including me. Unfortunately, I learnt Dylanesque (and perhaps ee cummings) forms of expression in junior high school before comprehensive English composition in senior high school. I was previously only interested in science and technology and my ability to do more than brainstorm and rough draft was sorely lacking. Plus, where I was living in my infancy, it was a Little Canada and grammar was backwards to the English. I would go back and forth between the English and Quebecois modes of expression in sentence structure. My form of speech when young was also influenced by hick speech in Appalachia, even though I lived in New England. You could imagine such ridicule, but I had to go through speech therapy. My IQ is either high 100s or low 200s.
"effectively banned" :icon1:
only if one is unable to produce
"sourceable, historical references or logically posited arguments"
to the subject.
rise to the challenge! http://www.theapricity.com/forum/images/icons/icon14.gifSee above.
Oh uh.. internets... drama.....
http://www.nastyhobbit.org/data/media/2/must-not-fap.jpghttp://www.killingtonzone.com/albums/Dorks-stuff/ArguingInternetSpecialOlympics2.jpg
Remember what Jesus said!
i have not come to bring peace but a sword.
His mooks are more often than not talebearers, tattletales and general party-poopers.God cannot be boxed in to some kind of unipersonality. I am not a Puritan, Protestant or Fundamentalist. God is above the vanity of appearances and etiquette.:rolleyes:
Eldritch
11-24-2009, 08:12 AM
Her nosiness ought to be less than apologetic for unreasonable people who hate being admonished for being unreasonable to other people from the get-go.
No matter how many times I read this sentence, it refuses to open up and make sense to me.
No matter how many times I read this sentence, it refuses to open up and make sense to me.Maybe I could have been less cryptic and listed the specifics of who, why, where, when, what? She knows the 5 Ws, so she ought to rectify for her own sake. We don't need to repeat the issues again and again. If you are not privy to it, don't lament. Who cares?:lightbul:
EDIT:
Eldritch, I really don't mean to swat you aside like a fly. I like you, so I will show you some of it:
Admission criteria:... (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=142171#post142171) 11-23-2009 02:37 PMAemma (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/member.php?u=107) Uncool O.F. ...very uncool
This was a negative rep point, something my account is unable to give. If I had this ability, I would not have even bothered with any long winded responses to the massively abominable, Antichrist Circle Jerk of heathens, atheists and agnostics. That doesn't mean any one of these people have nothing valuable to say and I do in fact, look upon highly the thoughts of many in these groups, but I don't take these religious stances as gospel, especially those based in bandwagon nonsense. I would have kept any negative one liners private, to preserve the integrity of the threads.
Yes, I do care about that. I am an intellectual most of the time, even when I'm employed for something entirely different. I work with my hands and play with my mind, not the opposite and this is expressly my wish, for my mind will never be enslaved or judged on account of money. Intellectual growth is a very high priority for me and always happened to be the case since I saw people take sports seriously, as if some cure for cancer was found when somebody scored a goal. WTF? Intellectual growth has spawned spiritual growth, when in unity with my physical self. It is not simply a case of mind over matter, but mind joined with matter that is harmonious to the spirit. Wow, to explain something very personal, may seem like rambling. Do I need to make a professional thesis on it? Give me a break.
I like your intelligence Eldritch, which is why I requested friendship here @ Apricity, aside from previous tNP history. Back in those days, though, I hated the Finnish, or "noble savage"-construct thought of Finns as being the Uebermensch simply because of blonder hair and bluer eyes, because the Ural-Altaic stratum is even more Asiatic in its constitution than Indo-European. I would, at that time, much more prefer to place emphasis on the Basque ethnic group for its uniqueness in Europe, whilst also deciding to value the pre-Islamic North African history of Europe, despite all of the noxious Nutzi ideology which pervades these forums. I am more like Al-Frankawi on this. I choose to look at things from different perspectives because I am just not awed at the self-confidence of broken dreams held by those with failed social experiments that the Hunnish Krauts force onto others without understanding that people disagree.
The Asian hordes have abused Europe time after time and the territorial boundaries of Europe have shown this, but most people in these kinds of forums only see fit to deride that which lies to the south of the Mediterranean. I see wackos who want to live in a world of Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan, but get hydrophobic over the mere notion of the Jews, being also totally naive to Europe's Phoenician cultural underpinnings. This is ahistorical nonsense and willful ignorance and I will stand tall whenever somebody with rabble-rousing, fifth columnist idiocy tries to make me agree to something I already have heard of but am nevertheless, unimpressed by spin and revisionism, trying to pin the blame of that onto me.
Another thing too, which I will finish here once and for all:
I don't believe in Calvinistic Progress, but I do believe conversion to Christianity was progress in a true sense, as our ancestors did. It is demoralising and scandalous that we all should second-guess them, for some PC hippie revisionism and reassessment of everything near and dear to us. I really don't care to go down that road again. I did it for years and it only destroyed my life when I actually took it to heart, to try and cast aside the world made by Christianity for some pale and anachronistic imitation of a bygone world, even pretending that it was progress because the atheists and agnostics always say that post-Christianity is progress. I have stopped believing in their fantasy, partly because heathenism provided a step into the past for some glories which were only perfected upon acceptance of Christ. I have come to KNOW more than they would like to let on, for instance the ontological argument, based in Hellenistic philosophy itself, that heathenry is derivative and tangential, subjective--I enjoy it but it's not the absolute truth, only part of it. For instance, I really, really, REALLY like Apollo and the Oracle of Delphi, but there IS more than that. The more the better, IMHO. That's final for me and I don't think I really need to expound upon this for further clarity.
If anybody doubts the derivativeness of Germanic culture, then why append it to Aryans in the first place? Hitler tried to make the Germans worthy successors (before this contemporary mythification of Indo-Germanic studies, it was unknown), legitimate offspring of them, but it was the Scythians of Eastern Europe who held this, the very people he sought to destroy, especially the Gypsies. Macedonia was superior to both the Aryans and the Scythians, so why ignore Mediterranean culture? It's absolute fantasy revisionism, so why take it seriously?
I also don't think that Jehovah likes people speaking for him, which is what most of his followers seem to like to do.
I also don't think that Jehovah likes people speaking for him, which is what most of his followers seem to like to do.So Apollo didn't like the Delphic Oracle? Hmm...:lightbul::confused:
Osweo
11-24-2009, 10:08 PM
She followed me around from the beginning of my membership
:wacko:
My IQ is either high 100s or low 200s.
:pound:
:wacko:
:pound:Even monkeys can make faces. Everything is so personal to you. Thanks for being a second stalker on my list, just a more devolved one than her.:coffee:
Aemma
11-24-2009, 10:16 PM
Maybe I could have been less cryptic and listed the specifics of who, why, where, when, what? She knows the 5 Ws, so she ought to rectify for her own sake. We don't need to repeat the issues again and again. If you are not privy to it, don't lament. Who cares?:lightbul:
EDIT:
Eldritch, I really don't mean to swat you aside like a fly. I like you, so I will show you some of it:
Admission criteria:... (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=142171#post142171) 11-23-2009 02:37 PMAemma (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/member.php?u=107) Uncool O.F. ...very uncool
This was a negative rep point, something my account is unable to give. If I had this ability, I would not have even bothered with any long winded responses to the massively abominable, Antichrist Circle Jerk of heathens, atheists and agnostics. That doesn't mean any one of these people have nothing valuable to say and I do in fact, look upon highly the thoughts of many in these groups, but I don't take these religious stances as gospel, especially those based in bandwagon nonsense. I would have kept any negative one liners private, to preserve the integrity of the threads.
Yes, I do care about that. I am an intellectual most of the time, even when I'm employed for something entirely different. I work with my hands and play with my mind, not the opposite and this is expressly my wish, for my mind will never be enslaved or judged on account of money. Intellectual growth is a very high priority for me and always happened to be the case since I saw people take sports seriously, as if some cure for cancer was found when somebody scored a goal. WTF? Intellectual growth has spawned spiritual growth, when in unity with my physical self. It is not simply a case of mind over matter, but mind joined with matter that is harmonious to the spirit. Wow, to explain something very personal, may seem like rambling. Do I need to make a professional thesis on it? Give me a break.
I like your intelligence Eldritch, which is why I requested friendship here @ Apricity, aside from previous tNP history. Back in those days, though, I hated the Finnish, or "noble savage"-construct thought of Finns as being the Uebermensch simply because of blonder hair and bluer eyes, because the Ural-Altaic stratum is even more Asiatic in its constitution than Indo-European. I would, at that time, much more prefer to place emphasis on the Basque ethnic group for its uniqueness in Europe, whilst also deciding to value the pre-Islamic North African history of Europe, despite all of the noxious Nutzi ideology which pervades these forums. I am more like Al-Frankawi on this. I choose to look at things from different perspectives because I am just not awed at the self-confidence of broken dreams held by those with failed social experiments that the Hunnish Krauts force onto others without understanding that people disagree.
The Asian hordes have abused Europe time after time and the territorial boundaries of Europe have shown this, but most people in these kinds of forums only see fit to deride that which lies to the south of the Mediterranean. I see wackos who want to live in a world of Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan, but get hydrophobic over the mere notion of the Jews, being also totally naive to Europe's Phoenician cultural underpinnings. This is ahistorical nonsense and willful ignorance and I will stand tall whenever somebody with rabble-rousing, fifth columnist idiocy tries to make me agree to something I already have heard of but am nevertheless, unimpressed by spin and revisionism, trying to pin the blame of that onto me.
Another thing too, which I will finish here once and for all:
I don't believe in Calvinistic Progress, but I do believe conversion to Christianity was progress in a true sense, as our ancestors did. It is demoralising and scandalous that we all should second-guess them, for some PC hippie revisionism and reassessment of everything near and dear to us. I really don't care to go down that road again. I did it for years and it only destroyed my life when I actually took it to heart, to try and cast aside the world made by Christianity for some pale and anachronistic imitation of a bygone world, even pretending that it was progress because the atheists and agnostics always say that post-Christianity is progress. I have stopped believing in their fantasy, partly because heathenism provided a step into the past for some glories which were only perfected upon acceptance of Christ. I have come to KNOW more than they would like to let on, for instance the ontological argument, based in Hellenistic philosophy itself, that heathenry is derivative and tangential, subjective--I enjoy it but it's not the absolute truth, only part of it. For instance, I really, really, REALLY like Apollo and the Oracle of Delphi, but there IS more than that. The more the better, IMHO. That's final for me and I don't think I really need to expound upon this for further clarity.
If anybody doubts the derivativeness of Germanic culture, then why append it to Aryans in the first place? Hitler tried to make the Germans worthy successors (before this contemporary mythification of Indo-Germanic studies, it was unknown), legitimate offspring of them, but it was the Scythians of Eastern Europe who held this, the very people he sought to destroy, especially the Gypsies. Macedonia was superior to both the Aryans and the Scythians, so why ignore Mediterranean culture? It's absolute fantasy revisionism, so why take it seriously?
Oh my gods O. F., are you quite done with your ravings? :rolleyes: You make no sense and take way too many things out of context my dear man. :coffee:
Electronic God-Man
11-24-2009, 10:30 PM
LOL.
Gods, I am not drunk enough yet to truly respond to this thread!
*pounds a beer*
LOL.
Gods, I am not drunk enough yet to truly respond to this thread!
*pounds a beer*This response is better than the one above, but not quite. So far, only Svipdag has anything relevant to say.:p
Aemma
11-24-2009, 10:34 PM
This response is better than the one above, but not quite. So far, only Svipdag has anything relevant to say.:p
You're quite right only Svipdag indeed. And this de facto also excludes you from the mix. :coffee:
You're quite right only Svipdag indeed. And this de facto also excludes you from the mix. :coffee:So, this is mutually exclusive, or rather, Mutually Assured Dysfunction (MAD)? How big of you now. It's a step in the right direction.:D
Aemma
11-24-2009, 10:45 PM
So, this is mutually exclusive, or rather, Mutually Assured Dysfunction (MAD)? How big of you now. It's a step in the right direction.:D
Hey anything to help the cause, brother! :thumb001:
Allenson
11-24-2009, 10:48 PM
I see wackos who want to live in a world of Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan, but get hydrophobic over the mere notion of the Jews,
I'll take a horse & yurt on the steppes any day over desert Jewish confines. :lightbul:
http://atoc.colorado.edu/~cassano/atoc4750/Daily_images/20080205/steppes.jpg
Hey anything to help the cause, brother! :thumb001:You've paid your dues then. I'm tight fisted Tyke. Not even the Scots can pull one over me.
I'll take a horse & yurt on the steppes any day over desert Jewish confines. :lightbul:
http://atoc.colorado.edu/~cassano/atoc4750/Daily_images/20080205/steppes.jpgMaybe I put the Jews to shame too with my lack of generosity. I would prefer the Lappish life if it meant uncharacteristically "European" culture. Reindeer sleighs, yessir. After all, CHRISTMAS has all kinds of influences in it. Too bad Psychonaut had to go batshit over that though.:D Since when is a desert confining? That's where the ascetics go to live it really rough. Just ask Jean-Baptiste.
Osweo
11-24-2009, 10:54 PM
I'll take a horse & yurt on the steppes any day over desert Jewish confines. :lightbul:
Too right! :thumbs
And the Altaics only learnt that way of life off our kinfolk anyway. :)
Allenson
11-24-2009, 10:57 PM
Since when is a desert confining?
No, Judaism is. :cool:
It just came from the desert.
Eldritch
11-24-2009, 11:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwiX6k6daTM
Too right! :thumbs
And the Altaics only learnt that way of life off our kinfolk anyway. :)If you believe in Aryan conspiracy theories.
No, Judaism is. :cool:
It just came from the desert.I'll remember that when I read St. Paul universalising Judaism by the Greek infrastructure which is Christianity.
Judaism came from Abraham of the Chaldeans, on the Tigris and Euphrates, part of the future Aryan empire of Cyrus, Xerxes and Darius that Alexander conquered.
iwiX6k6daTMCarnage: "Manhattan Jews are dead, DEAD I said!!!"
http://marvel.com/universe3zx/images/thumb/c/cc/Carnage_Family_Head.jpg/440px-Carnage_Family_Head.jpg
Osweo
11-24-2009, 11:06 PM
If you believe in Aryan conspiracy theories.
God... Should I even bother?
God... Should I even bother?To be, or not to be, a "gods-botherer"?;)
So Apollo didn't like the Delphic Oracle? Hmm...:lightbul::confused:
As far as I know Lord Apollon only ever had one oracle at Delphi.
As far as I know Lord Apollon only ever had one oracle at Delphi.Would that Oracle have been able to foretell that this would happen? Sorry Apollo, but I don't believe that anybody but Hermes among you could save this one:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_neg.gifUnmasking Catholicism:... (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=142884#post142884) 11-25-2009 12:00 AMOsweo (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/member.php?u=87) If you don't know HOW to use 'whom', then DON'T! It's quite unnecessary nowadays.
Osweo
11-25-2009, 12:12 AM
Sorry Apollo, but I don't believe that anybody but Hermes among you could save this one:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_neg.gifUnmasking Catholicism:... (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=142884#post142884) 11-25-2009 12:00 AMOsweo (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/member.php?u=87) If you don't know HOW to use 'whom', then DON'T! It's quite unnecessary nowadays.
Hell, I've tried to get you to improve your logic, but if I can at least get you to remember a few grammatical rules, then at least I'll have accomplished something! :D
If 'he/she' can go in the same place in a sentence, then 'whom' is incorrect. Grammatically it belongs where 'him/her' fit... :thumbs
Hell, I've tried to get you to improve your logic, but if I can at least get you to remember a few grammatical rules, then at least I'll have accomplished something! :D
If 'he/she' can go in the same place in a sentence, then 'whom' is incorrect. Grammatically it belongs where 'him/her' fit... :thumbs"Proper English" is so Southern. Perhaps Devonshire is your place to roost after all?;)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.