Issue between 23andme and FTDNA haplogroups

[Kazimiera]

According to 23andme my mtDNA is I1.

According to FTDNA my nt DNA is 1Ib.

Which is more likely. Does FTDNA not have a greater database than 23andme?

[Kale]

Saw this on another thread literally 2 seconds ago. I don't think they conflict, one just goes into deeper clades.

[Kazimiera]

Saw this on another thread literally 2 seconds ago. I don't think they conflict, one just goes into deeper clades.

So in which case it is better to got with FTDNA with I1b deeper clade that 23andme's I1.

[Thor2009]

So in which case it is better to got with FTDNA with I1b deeper clade that 23andme's I1.

Go with the FTDNA deeper clade.
If I recall correctly, FTDNA is better with haplogroups than 23andMe is, anyway.

[Kazimiera]

Go with the FTDNA deeper clade.
If I recall correctly, FTDNA is better with haplogroups than 23andMe is, anyway.

Thank you. :)

[Kazimiera]

I have been thinking a lot recently, and I know for a fact that we have very little Scandinavian/Danish input in the family. Even in the 23andme tests it shows very low. The Lemkos, however, have the highest percentage of mtDNA I than any of the other groups and I think it may be possible that it is a Lemko (East European) connection than a Scandinavian one.

[JoeyGee8688]

Not to hijack that thread, but 23&Me lists my mtdna Haplogroup as "K2", nothing more specific. Is there some service, other than another pricey project such as FTdna that could quantify it any further?